2026-31: California conformity clean-up legislation enacted

SB 1435 (Ch.26-236), which cleans up a variety of inadvertent issues that arose as a result of SB 711’s passage in 2025, was signed into law by Governor Newsom. The bill is effective retroactively to the 2025 tax year.

Highlights of the changes made by SB 1435 include:

  • Decoupling from the IRC §163(j) business interest expense limitation for Personal Income Tax Law purposes. A drafting error in SB 711 inadvertently conformed California personal income tax law to the IRC §163(j) business interest expense limitation, although it correctly decoupled from the provision for corporation income and franchise tax purposes. This bill corrects that error;
  • Clarifying that California only conforms to the current federal treatment of alimony beginning with the 2026 tax year for divorce and separation agreements executed on or after December 31, 2025, or for agreements that existed prior to 2026 if they are modified to specifically incorporate current federal treatment. Under federal law alimony paid is nondeductible by the payor and alimony received is not includable in the recipient’s taxable income for divorce or separation instruments executed after December 31, 2018. The way SB 711 was written it would have applied current federal treatment of alimony for California purposes beginning with the 2027 tax year, even for agreements executed during the 2019 through 2025 tax years;
  • Clarifying that the maximum amount of investment income a taxpayer can earn and still be eligible for the California Earned Income Tax Credit is $3,400, regardless of the federally stipulated threshold (which is currently set at $10,000 and adjusted annually for inflation ($11,950 for 2025; $12,200 for 2026));
  • Decoupling from the special withholding rules under IRC §1446(f) related to dispositions of partnership interests. This means buyers purchasing a partnership interest from a foreign partner do not have to collect and remit California withholding pursuant to this provision on any gain realized by the seller from the sale; and
  • Clarifying that California conforms to the federal technical correction that states that the excess business loss does not include deductions for the trade or business of performing services as an employee.

Sign up for Spidell’s 2026/2027 Federal and California Tax Update webinar and get information on the most important issues facing your practice. Click here and register today.

Sign up for Spidell’s Flash E-mail — Get breaking news delivered to your inbox, plus other free analysis and information for tax professionals. Join our community and stay at the top of your game. Click here to sign up.

California conformity clean-up legislation enacted

SB 1435 (Ch.26-236), which cleans up a variety of inadvertent issues that arose as a result of SB 711’s passage in 2025, was signed into law by Governor Newsom. The bill is effective retroactively to the 2025 tax year.

Highlights of the changes made by SB 1435 include:

  • Decoupling from the IRC §163(j) business interest expense limitation for Personal Income Tax Law purposes. A drafting error in SB 711 inadvertently conformed California personal income tax law to the IRC §163(j) business interest expense limitation, although it correctly decoupled from the provision for corporation income and franchise tax purposes. This bill corrects that error;
  • Clarifying that California only conforms to the current federal treatment of alimony beginning with the 2026 tax year for divorce and separation agreements executed on or after December 31, 2025, or for agreements that existed prior to 2026 if they are modified to specifically incorporate current federal treatment. Under federal law alimony paid is nondeductible by the payor and alimony received is not includable in the recipient’s taxable income for divorce or separation instruments executed after December 31, 2018. The way SB 711 was written it would have applied current federal treatment of alimony for California purposes beginning with the 2027 tax year, even for agreements executed during the 2019 through 2025 tax years;
  • Clarifying that the maximum amount of investment income a taxpayer can earn and still be eligible for the California Earned Income Tax Credit is $3,400, regardless of the federally stipulated threshold (which is currently set at $10,000 and adjusted annually for inflation ($11,950 for 2025; $12,200 for 2026));
  • Decoupling from the special withholding rules under IRC §1446(f) related to dispositions of partnership interests. This means buyers purchasing a partnership interest from a foreign partner do not have to collect and remit California withholding pursuant to this provision on any gain realized by the seller from the sale; and
  • Clarifying that California conforms to the federal technical correction that states that the excess business loss does not include deductions for the trade or business of performing services as an employee.

Sign up for Spidell’s 2026/2027 Federal and California Tax Update webinar and get information on the most important issues facing your practice. Click here and register today.

2026-30: Congress passes disaster tax relief

The Doug LaMalfa Disaster Tax Relief Act (HR 5366) (the Act) passed both chambers of Congress and is headed for President Trump’s desk, where he is expected to sign the bill into law.

The Act extends the treatment of personal casualty losses and wildfire-related compensation. Its provisions can be divided into two key sections:

  • Enhancement of disaster loss deductions; and
  • Wildfire relief exclusions.

Enhancement of disaster loss deductions

The Act represents an extension of existing disaster loss deduction rules under IRC §163 by allowing a deduction for qualified net disaster losses plus the portion of other casualty losses that exceed 10% of AGI through the end of 2026. This provision also extends the removal of the 10% of AGI floor for “qualified disaster losses” through the end of 2026.

Additionally, the Act increases the per-event threshold for qualified disaster losses from $100 to $500 and it allows taxpayers who do not itemize their deductions to claim the qualified net disaster loss as an addition to their standard deductions. These provisions are effective for taxable years beginning after December 31, 2024.

Wildfire relief exclusions

The Act creates new IRC §139M, which excludes qualified wildfire relief payments from a taxpayer’s gross income. To be excluded from income, the qualified wildfire relief payment must be related to a federally declared disaster resulting from a forest or range fire declared after December 31, 2024, and before January 1, 2027.

The Act represents an extension of prior tax relief that was available to victims of wildfires through the Federal Disaster Tax Relief Act.

Sign up for Spidell’s 2026/2027 Federal and California Tax Update webinar and get information on the most important issues facing your practice. Click here and register today.

Sign up for Spidell’s Flash E-mail — Get breaking news delivered to your inbox, plus other free analysis and information for tax professionals. Join our community and stay at the top of your game. Click here to sign up.

Congress passes disaster tax relief

The Doug LaMalfa Disaster Tax Relief Act (HR 5366) (the Act) passed both chambers of Congress and is headed for President Trump’s desk, where he is expected to sign the bill into law.

The Act extends the treatment of personal casualty losses and wildfire-related compensation. Its provisions can be divided into two key sections:

  • Enhancement of disaster loss deductions; and
  • Wildfire relief exclusions.

Enhancement of disaster loss deductions

The Act represents an extension of existing disaster loss deduction rules under IRC §163 by allowing a deduction for qualified net disaster losses plus the portion of other casualty losses that exceed 10% of AGI through the end of 2026. This provision also extends the removal of the 10% of AGI floor for “qualified disaster losses” through the end of 2026.

Additionally, the Act increases the per-event threshold for qualified disaster losses from $100 to $500 and it allows taxpayers who do not itemize their deductions to claim the qualified net disaster loss as an addition to their standard deductions. These provisions are effective for taxable years beginning after December 31, 2024.

Wildfire relief exclusions

The Act creates new IRC §139M, which excludes qualified wildfire relief payments from a taxpayer’s gross income. To be excluded from income, the qualified wildfire relief payment must be related to a federally declared disaster resulting from a forest or range fire declared after December 31, 2024, and before January 1, 2027.

The Act represents an extension of prior tax relief that was available to victims of wildfires through the Federal Disaster Tax Relief Act.

Sign up for Spidell’s 2026/2027 Federal and California Tax Update webinar and get information on the most important issues facing your practice. Click here and register today.

2026-29: Fifth Circuit redefines its definition of a limited partner again

The Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals has withdrawn and reissued its prior opinion in Sirius Solutions LLLP v. Comm. (165 F. 4th 374 (5th Cir. 2026)). Sirius Solutions, LLLP is now called K Alain, LLLP, so the reissued opinion was released as K Alain, LLLP v. Comm.((5th Cir. 2026) Case No. 24-60240; 2026-23170).

At issue in the case is the meaning of the term “limited partner” for purposes of applying the limited partner exception under IRC §1402(a)(13). Limited partners are not subject to self-employment tax on their distributive share of partnership income.

In its original opinion, issued January 16, 2026, the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals rejected the Tax Court’s holding in Soroban Capital Partners, LP v. Comm. ((November 28, 2023) 161 TC 12). Sorobanrequires a partner’s earnings to be of an investment nature for the partner to qualify for the limited partner exception. Stated otherwise, even a partner who is defined as a limited partner under state law is still subject to self-employment tax on all their partnership income unless they are a passive investor in the partnership.

The Fifth Circuit’s reissued option under K Alain still rejects the Soroban decision but backs off its black-and-white dictionary definition of a limited partner. Now, the Fifth Circuit holds that a limited partner is a partner who is defined as a limited partner under state law and “who plays no significant role in managing or running [the partnership].” The case has been remanded back to the Tax Court where the facts of the case will be applied to the Fifth Circuit’s renewed definition of a limited partner.

We will keep you informed of any further developments.

Sign up for Spidell’s 2026/2027 Federal and California Tax Update webinar and get information on the most important issues facing your practice. Click here and register today.

Sign up for Spidell’s Flash E-mail — Get breaking news delivered to your inbox, plus other free analysis and information for tax professionals. Join our community and stay at the top of your game. Click here to sign up.

Fifth Circuit redefines its definition of a limited partner again

The Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals has withdrawn and reissued its prior opinion in Sirius Solutions LLLP v. Comm. (165 F. 4th 374 (5th Cir. 2026)). Sirius Solutions, LLLP is now called K Alain, LLLP, so the reissued opinion was released as K Alain, LLLP v. Comm.((5th Cir. 2026) Case No. 24-60240; 2026-23170).

At issue in the case is the meaning of the term “limited partner” for purposes of applying the limited partner exception under IRC §1402(a)(13). Limited partners are not subject to self-employment tax on their distributive share of partnership income.

In its original opinion, issued January 16, 2026, the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals rejected the Tax Court’s holding in Soroban Capital Partners, LP v. Comm. ((November 28, 2023) 161 TC 12). Sorobanrequires a partner’s earnings to be of an investment nature for the partner to qualify for the limited partner exception. Stated otherwise, even a partner who is defined as a limited partner under state law is still subject to self-employment tax on all their partnership income unless they are a passive investor in the partnership.

The Fifth Circuit’s reissued option under K Alain still rejects the Soroban decision but backs off its black-and-white dictionary definition of a limited partner. Now, the Fifth Circuit holds that a limited partner is a partner who is defined as a limited partner under state law and “who plays no significant role in managing or running [the partnership].” The case has been remanded back to the Tax Court where the facts of the case will be applied to the Fifth Circuit’s renewed definition of a limited partner.

We will keep you informed of any further developments.

Sign up for Spidell’s 2026/2027 Federal and California Tax Update webinar and get information on the most important issues facing your practice. Click here and register today.

2026-28: Proposed regulations address employer contributions to Trump accounts

Implementation guidance for employer IRC §128 Trump account contribution programs and IRC §129 dependent care assistance programs (DCAPs) has been issued by the IRS. (REG-101355-26) The proposed regulations address changes made by OBBBA.

The maximum employer contribution exclusion is $2,500 per employee for the 2026 and 2027 tax years and is adjusted for inflation beginning with the 2028 taxable year. (IRC §128(b)) For a married couple, each spouse’s employer can contribute the maximum $2,500.

Key aspects of Trump account contribution programs are laid out in the proposed regulations and include:

  • The maximum exclusion is per employee, not per child/dependent;
  • If an individual is employed by two unrelated employers, each offering a Trump account contribution program, the maximum aggregate exclusion for the individual remains $2,500;
  • Contributions exceeding the maximum exclusion amount are taxable compensation and are subject to FICA, FUTA, and RRTA withholding;
  • Eligibility for the Trump account employer contribution exclusion is limited to common-law employees. Unlike the Dependent Care Assistance Program exclusion, self-employed individuals (including partners, sole proprietors, and 2% S corporation shareholders) are ineligible to participate in an employer’s Trump account contribution program, and any contributions to their child’s account is taxable income; and
  • Trump account contribution programs cannot limit contributions to Trump accounts held by specific financial institutions.

Sign up for Spidell’s 2026/2027 Federal and California Tax Update webinar and get information on the most important issues facing your practice. Click here and register today.

Sign up for Spidell’s Flash E-mail — Get breaking news delivered to your inbox, plus other free analysis and information for tax professionals. Join our community and stay at the top of your game. Click here to sign up.

Proposed regulations address employer contributions to Trump accounts

Implementation guidance for employer IRC §128 Trump account contribution programs and IRC §129 dependent care assistance programs (DCAPs) has been issued by the IRS. (REG-101355-26) The proposed regulations address changes made by OBBBA.

The maximum employer contribution exclusion is $2,500 per employee for the 2026 and 2027 tax years and is adjusted for inflation beginning with the 2028 taxable year. (IRC §128(b)) For a married couple, each spouse’s employer can contribute the maximum $2,500.

Key aspects of Trump account contribution programs are laid out in the proposed regulations and include:

  • The maximum exclusion is per employee, not per child/dependent;
  • If an individual is employed by two unrelated employers, each offering a Trump account contribution program, the maximum aggregate exclusion for the individual remains $2,500;
  • Contributions exceeding the maximum exclusion amount are taxable compensation and are subject to FICA, FUTA, and RRTA withholding;
  • Eligibility for the Trump account employer contribution exclusion is limited to common-law employees. Unlike the Dependent Care Assistance Program exclusion, self-employed individuals (including partners, sole proprietors, and 2% S corporation shareholders) are ineligible to participate in an employer’s Trump account contribution program, and any contributions to their child’s account is taxable income; and
  • Trump account contribution programs cannot limit contributions to Trump accounts held by specific financial institutions.

Sign up for Spidell’s 2026/2027 Federal and California Tax Update webinar and get information on the most important issues facing your practice. Click here and register today.

2026-27: FTB issues disaster relief reminder

We’ve been hearing from practitioners whose clients received penalty notices related to the Los Angeles County fires, even though those clients qualified for the October 15, 2025, postponed filing and payment deadline. The FTB has issued a reminder on how this relief works, along with a link to FAQs to help practitioners resolve these notices for affected clients.

The FTB news flash is available here, and guides practitioners with issues related to disaster relief to contact the FTB by:

  • E-mail: FTBLACountyDisasterRelief@ftb.ca.gov; or
  • Online: MyFTB.

The news flash states that e-mail is the fastest and most efficient way to resolve account matters related to the Los Angeles County disaster, and includes a link to FAQs related to the disaster:

Sign up for Spidell’s 2026/2027 Federal and California Tax Update webinar and get information on the most important issues facing your practice. Click here and register today.

Sign up for Spidell’s Flash E-mail — Get breaking news delivered to your inbox, plus other free analysis and information for tax professionals. Join our community and stay at the top of your game. Click here to sign up.

FTB issues disaster relief reminder

We’ve been hearing from practitioners whose clients received penalty notices related to the Los Angeles County fires, even though those clients qualified for the October 15, 2025, postponed filing and payment deadline. The FTB has issued a reminder on how this relief works, along with a link to FAQs to help practitioners resolve these notices for affected clients.

The FTB news flash is available here, and guides practitioners with issues related to disaster relief to contact the FTB by:

  • E-mail: FTBLACountyDisasterRelief@ftb.ca.gov; or
  • Online: MyFTB.

The news flash states that e-mail is the fastest and most efficient way to resolve account matters related to the Los Angeles County disaster, and includes a link to FAQs related to the disaster:

Sign up for Spidell’s 2026/2027 Federal and California Tax Update webinar and get information on the most important issues facing your practice. Click here and register today.

2026-26: California conforms to Trump Account treatment, provides EV rebates

Governor Newsom has signed the following legislation.

SB 180 (Ch. 26-85):

  • Conforms to the federal tax treatment of Trump Accounts, retroactive to the beginning of the 2026 tax year. This means earnings on the account are not taxable until distributed. California will also conform to the IRC §128 exclusion of employer contributions to Trump Accounts and the exclusion from a beneficiary’s gross income of qualified contributions from a governmental entity or charitable organization; and
  • Extends the California Competes Tax Credit for an additional five years, through the 2034 tax year. The credit, which is administered through the California GO-Biz office and awarded on a competitive basis, provides financial incentives to attract and retain private companies that agree to hire and invest in California.

SB 168 (Ch. 26-81) funds a new $3,500 instant rebate through the MyFirst EV program for any Californian who is purchasing their first electric vehicle from a dealer. The rebate is funded 50% by California and 50% by participating automakers. The total rebate is equal to $3,500 for new EVs with an MSRP of up to $50,000 and $1,750 for used vehicles sold for up to $25,000. According to the Governor’s office the rebate will be available later this summer. We assume the rebate will only be available prospectively but are awaiting additional details.

Sign up for Spidell’s 2026/2027 Federal and California Tax Update webinar and get information on the most important issues facing your practice. Click here and register today.

Sign up for Spidell’s Flash E-mail — Get breaking news delivered to your inbox, plus other free analysis and information for tax professionals. Join our community and stay at the top of your game. Click here to sign up.

California conforms to Trump Account treatment, provides EV rebates

Governor Newsom has signed the following legislation.

SB 180 (Ch. 26-85):

  • Conforms to the federal tax treatment of Trump Accounts, retroactive to the beginning of the 2026 tax year. This means earnings on the account are not taxable until distributed. California will also conform to the IRC §128 exclusion of employer contributions to Trump Accounts and the exclusion from a beneficiary’s gross income of qualified contributions from a governmental entity or charitable organization; and
  • Extends the California Competes Tax Credit for an additional five years, through the 2034 tax year. The credit, which is administered through the California GO-Biz office and awarded on a competitive basis, provides financial incentives to attract and retain private companies that agree to hire and invest in California.

SB 168 (Ch. 26-81) funds a new $3,500 instant rebate through the MyFirst EV program for any Californian who is purchasing their first electric vehicle from a dealer. The rebate is funded 50% by California and 50% by participating automakers. The total rebate is equal to $3,500 for new EVs with an MSRP of up to $50,000 and $1,750 for used vehicles sold for up to $25,000. According to the Governor’s office the rebate will be available later this summer. We assume the rebate will only be available prospectively but are awaiting additional details.

Sign up for Spidell’s 2026/2027 Federal and California Tax Update webinar and get information on the most important issues facing your practice. Click here and register today.

2026-25: IRS increases standard mileage rates

The IRS has increased the standard mileage rates for business, medical, and moving expense purposes, applied to expenses incurred on or after July 1, 2026:

  • Business mileage: 76 cents per mile (increased from 72.5 cents per mile); and
  • Medical and moving mileage: 23.5 cents per mile (increased from 20.5 cents per mile).
    (IRS Announcement 2026-11, modifying IRS Notice 2026-10)

The charitable mileage rate is statutory and remains at 14 cents per mile.

Sign up for Spidell’s 2026/2027 Federal and California Tax Update webinar and get information on the most important issues facing your practice. Click here and register today.

Sign up for Spidell’s Flash E-mail — Get breaking news delivered to your inbox, plus other free analysis and information for tax professionals. Join our community and stay at the top of your game. Click here to sign up.

IRS increases standard mileage rates

The IRS has increased the standard mileage rates for business, medical, and moving expense purposes, applied to expenses incurred on or after July 1, 2026:

  • Business mileage: 76 cents per mile (increased from 72.5 cents per mile); and
  • Medical and moving mileage: 23.5 cents per mile (increased from 20.5 cents per mile).
    (IRS Announcement 2026-11, modifying IRS Notice 2026-10)

The charitable mileage rate is statutory and remains at 14 cents per mile.

Sign up for Spidell’s 2026/2027 Federal and California Tax Update webinar and get information on the most important issues facing your practice. Click here and register today.

2026-24: IRS replacing first-time penalty abatement with automatic relief

Beginning this summer, the IRS is phasing in a new Automatic Exemption from Penalty (AEP) program that will replace the first-time penalty abatement program (which is being phased out). AEP will be fully effective for eligible returns with original due dates on or after January 1, 2027. (IR-2026-83)

Under AEP, the IRS will automatically provide penalty relief to qualified taxpayers; taxpayers will no longer have to apply for penalty abatement. If eligible, the IRS will apply AEP and issue a notice confirming that the relief was granted.

Taxpayers qualify if they have a history of timely filing the return and paying any tax due in the three prior years (or 12 consecutive quarters for quarterly returns). When taxpayers qualify, penalties are not assessed during processing for:

  • Failure to file;
  • Failure to pay; or
  • Failure to deposit.

Estimated tax penalties are not available for abatement under either the existing first-time abatement program or under the new AEP.

Not all returns are eligible for AEP. For example, information returns and returns that are filed only in response to specific transactions or infrequent events (such as Form 706, U.S. Estate Tax Return, or Form 709, Gift Tax Return) generally are not eligible.

During the transition from first-time penalty abatement to the AEP program, some qualifying taxpayers may still receive penalty notices for eligible tax year 2025 and 2026 quarterly returns. Taxpayers who believe they qualify may contact the IRS to request first-time penalty abatement.

Sign up for Spidell’s Quarterly Tax Update webinar to stay ahead of the curve and get quarterly updates all year. Click here and register today.

Sign up for Spidell’s Flash E-mail — Get breaking news delivered to your inbox, plus other free analysis and information for tax professionals. Join our community and stay at the top of your game. Click here to sign up.

 

IRS replacing first-time penalty abatement with automatic relief

Beginning this summer, the IRS is phasing in a new Automatic Exemption from Penalty (AEP) program that will replace the first-time penalty abatement program (which is being phased out). AEP will be fully effective for eligible returns with original due dates on or after January 1, 2027. (IR-2026-83)

Under AEP, the IRS will automatically provide penalty relief to qualified taxpayers; taxpayers will no longer have to apply for penalty abatement. If eligible, the IRS will apply AEP and issue a notice confirming that the relief was granted.

Taxpayers qualify if they have a history of timely filing the return and paying any tax due in the three prior years (or 12 consecutive quarters for quarterly returns). When taxpayers qualify, penalties are not assessed during processing for:

  • Failure to file;
  • Failure to pay; or
  • Failure to deposit.

Estimated tax penalties are not available for abatement under either the existing first-time abatement program or under the new AEP.

Not all returns are eligible for AEP. For example, information returns and returns that are filed only in response to specific transactions or infrequent events (such as Form 706, U.S. Estate Tax Return, or Form 709, Gift Tax Return) generally are not eligible.

During the transition from first-time penalty abatement to the AEP program, some qualifying taxpayers may still receive penalty notices for eligible tax year 2025 and 2026 quarterly returns. Taxpayers who believe they qualify may contact the IRS to request first-time penalty abatement.

Sign up for Spidell’s Quarterly Tax Update webinar to stay ahead of the curve and get quarterly updates all year. Click here and register today.

Gift tax filing requirement guidance issued for Trump account contributions; California Trump account tax conformity bill introduced

The IRS has issued guidance addressing whether contributions to a Trump account constitute completed gifts. (Rev. Proc. 2026-25)

Although contributions to a Trump account made by a person who is not the account beneficiary is a gift of a future interest, the IRS is providing gift tax filing relief for qualified taxpayers. If a taxpayer meets all of the following safe harbor requirements, the IRS will not require the donor to file a gift tax return:

  • The taxpayer making the contribution is an individual;
  • The only taxable gifts made by the taxpayer during the calendar year are cash contributions to one or more Trump accounts, each made before the calendar year in which the account beneficiary turns age 18;
  • The taxpayer’s total gifts during the calendar year to each individual who is an account beneficiary, including contributions to that account beneficiary’s Trump account, do not exceed the annual exclusion ($19,000 for 2026);
  • Such contributions to Trump accounts made during the calendar year do not generate for that calendar year either a gift or GST tax liability, after application of the taxpayer’s remaining applicable credit amount against the gift tax, or remaining GST exemption; and
  • Disregarding the Trump account contributions made during the year, no gift tax return is filed or is required to be filed for that calendar year by or on behalf of the taxpayer.

The reason this safe harbor is so important is that gifts of future interests ordinarily trigger a gift tax filing requirement, even if the only gifts made by the taxpayer during the year are below the annual gift tax reporting threshold. (IRC §2503(b)(1); Treas. Regs. §25.2503-2(a))

Currently, the IRS processes about 300,000 gift tax return annually and as of June 4, 2026, nearly 6 million elections to open Trump accounts have already been received. The purpose of the safe harbor is to ease the IRS’s administrative burden by preventing the filing of millions more gift tax returns from taxpayers who are, according to the IRS, unlikely to have estates large enough to ever trigger an estate tax liability.

California Trump account tax conformity bill introduced

As part of the latest California budget deal negotiations, AB/SB 180 has been introduced which, if enacted, would include conformity to most aspects of the federal tax treatment of Trump accounts, including the exclusion of employer contributions to employee Trump accounts set up for their qualifying children. It is anticipated that the bill will be passed and signed by the Governor.

Sign up for Spidell’s 2026/27 Federal and California Tax Update Webinar to master the lessons learned with the new OBBBA deductions for tips, overtime, car loan interest, and the senior exclusion; evaluate when Trump accounts are a good option for your clients, and more. Click here and register today.

2026-22: New Qualified Opportunity Zone guidance clarifies gain recognition rules

Transitional guidance for Qualified Opportunity Zones (QOZs) has been released by the IRS ahead of proposed regulations implementing the QOZ changes made by OBBBA. (IRS Notice 2026-40)

For QOZ investors, the notice provides that taxpayers who invested in a QOZ fund prior to 2027 must still recognize deferred capital gains in their taxable income no later than December 31, 2026, and cannot defer those gains again.

Despite the mandatory gain recognition on December 31, 2026, the taxpayer continues to hold a “qualifying investment,” which means the taxpayer remains potentially eligible for the 10-year fair market value basis step-up, provided all other requirements are met.

If the taxpayer sells the QOZ fund interest after 2026, any capital gain realized from that sale would then be eligible for a QOZ deferral under the new OBBBA QOZ rules, which allow the taxpayer to defer gain recognition for up to five years from the QOZ fund investment date. However, taxpayers should weigh the benefit of this subsequent sale and the five-year deferral against the benefit of holding the investment for 10 years and getting the FMV step-up.

Additionally, any capital gains that are generated in the latter half of 2026 could qualify for the five-year deferral under OBBBA’s QOZ rules if they are invested in a newly designated QOZ on or after January 1, 2027 (within 180 days of the gain recognition).

Sign up for Spidell’s Quarterly Tax Update webinar to stay ahead of the curve and get quarterly updates all year. Click here and register today.

Sign up for Spidell’s Flash E-mail — Get breaking news delivered to your inbox, plus other free analysis and information for tax professionals. Join our community and stay at the top of your game. Click here to sign up.

New Qualified Opportunity Zone guidance clarifies gain recognition rules

Transitional guidance for Qualified Opportunity Zones (QOZs) has been released by the IRS ahead of proposed regulations implementing the QOZ changes made by OBBBA. (IRS Notice 2026-40)

For QOZ investors, the notice provides that taxpayers who invested in a QOZ fund prior to 2027 must still recognize deferred capital gains in their taxable income no later than December 31, 2026, and cannot defer those gains again.

Despite the mandatory gain recognition on December 31, 2026, the taxpayer continues to hold a “qualifying investment,” which means the taxpayer remains potentially eligible for the 10-year fair market value basis step-up, provided all other requirements are met.

If the taxpayer sells the QOZ fund interest after 2026, any capital gain realized from that sale would then be eligible for a QOZ deferral under the new OBBBA QOZ rules, which allow the taxpayer to defer gain recognition for up to five years from the QOZ fund investment date. However, taxpayers should weigh the benefit of this subsequent sale and the five-year deferral against the benefit of holding the investment for 10 years and getting the FMV step-up.

Additionally, any capital gains that are generated in the latter half of 2026 could qualify for the five-year deferral under OBBBA’s QOZ rules if they are invested in a newly designated QOZ on or after January 1, 2027 (within 180 days of the gain recognition).

Sign up for Spidell’s Quarterly Tax Update webinar to stay ahead of the curve and get quarterly updates all year. Click here and register today.

2026-21: Tax increases included in budget deal sent to Governor

Today, the California Senate joined the Assembly in passing AB/SB 122 that makes the following changes to California tax law. The Governor is expected to sign the bill.

AB/SB 122 proposes to:

  • Impose sales and use taxes on purchases of digitally delivered prewritten software, which includes software as a service (SaaS; products such as Slack, Zoom, tax software, etc.), effective January 1, 2027;
  • Extend the current $5 million business credit cap (without a percentage-based limit) through the 2029 tax year, and then impose a permanent business credit cap equal to the greater of $5 million or 70% of the total taxes imposed, beginning with the 2030 tax year;
  • Reduce the annual tax imposed on new LLCs, limited partnerships, and limited liability partnerships from $800 to $400, but only for their first year of operation for the 2027 through 2029 tax years; and
  • Impose a 100% tax on any settlement fund payments received by taxpayers during the 2026 through 2029 tax years from any anti-weaponization settlement fund established by the federal Department of Justice.

The NOL suspension currently in effect was not extended as part of the budget deal, meaning that is currently scheduled to expire at the end of 2026.

Sign up for Spidell’s Quarterly Tax Update webinar to stay ahead of the curve and get quarterly updates all year. Click here and register today.

Sign up for Spidell’s Flash E-mail — Get breaking news delivered to your inbox, plus other free analysis and information for tax professionals. Join our community and stay at the top of your game. Click here to sign up.

Tax increases included in budget deal sent to Governor

Today, the California Senate joined the Assembly in passing AB/SB 122 that makes the following changes to California tax law. The Governor is expected to sign the bill.

AB/SB 122 proposes to:

  • Impose sales and use taxes on purchases of digitally delivered prewritten software, which includes software as a service (SaaS; products such as Slack, Zoom, tax software, etc.), effective January 1, 2027;
  • Extend the current $5 million business credit cap (without a percentage-based limit) through the 2029 tax year, and then impose a permanent business credit cap equal to the greater of $5 million or 70% of the total taxes imposed, beginning with the 2030 tax year;
  • Reduce the annual tax imposed on new LLCs, limited partnerships, and limited liability partnerships from $800 to $400, but only for their first year of operation for the 2027 through 2029 tax years; and
  • Impose a 100% tax on any settlement fund payments received by taxpayers during the 2026 through 2029 tax years from any anti-weaponization settlement fund established by the federal Department of Justice.

The NOL suspension currently in effect was not extended as part of the budget deal, meaning that is currently scheduled to expire at the end of 2026.

Sign up for Spidell’s Quarterly Tax Update webinar to stay ahead of the curve and get quarterly updates all year. Click here and register today.

2026-20: Tax professionals may not be able to view FTB client notices

Tax professionals with a POA on file may be receiving alerts from the FTB that inform them that a client notice or other document has been posted. However, some tax professionals may not be able to access the Client Notices page in their MyFTB account.

According to the FTB, although this is a systems issue, it is not impacting all tax professionals. This means some tax professionals can identify which client the notice was sent to, but others are not able to determine this unless they go into each client’s account. Affected practitioners are unable to access the notice or other document unless they know the client’s name and access it through their client’s respective account.

The FTB is working to resolve the issue as quickly as possible.

Tax professionals should not call the FTB Tax Practitioner Hotline for assistance in determining which client was sent the notice, because hotline staff can only access the notice if the tax professional knows the client’s name.

We will work with the FTB to see if the FTB will provide any penalty and/or interest relief if they are unable to resolve this issue quickly.

Sign up for Spidell’s Quarterly Tax Update webinar to stay ahead of the curve and get quarterly updates all year. Click here and register today.

Sign up for Spidell’s Flash E-mail — Get breaking news delivered to your inbox, plus other free analysis and information for tax professionals. Join our community and stay at the top of your game. Click here to sign up.

Tax professionals may not be able to view FTB client notices

Tax professionals with a POA on file may be receiving alerts from the FTB that inform them that a client notice or other document has been posted. However, some tax professionals may not be able to access the Client Notices page in their MyFTB account.

According to the FTB, although this is a systems issue, it is not impacting all tax professionals. This means some tax professionals can identify which client the notice was sent to, but others are not able to determine this unless they go into each client’s account. Affected practitioners are unable to access the notice or other document unless they know the client’s name and access it through their client’s respective account.

The FTB is working to resolve the issue as quickly as possible.

Tax professionals should not call the FTB Tax Practitioner Hotline for assistance in determining which client was sent the notice, because hotline staff can only access the notice if the tax professional knows the client’s name.

We will work with the FTB to see if the FTB will provide any penalty and/or interest relief if they are unable to resolve this issue quickly.

Sign up for Spidell’s Quarterly Tax Update webinar to stay ahead of the curve and get quarterly updates all year. Click here and register today.

2026-19: Increased taxes included in California budget deal

Today, the California Legislature is scheduled to vote on a budget deal that could raise over $1.4 billion in new taxes for the 2026–27 fiscal year. There are two competing versions of the tax proposals included in the budget deal (AB/SB 122 vs. AB/SB 176), and at this stage it is unclear which will pass.

Both proposals would, if enacted:

  • Impose sales and use taxes on purchases of digitally delivered prewritten software, which includes software as a service (SaaS; products such as Slack, Zoom, tax software, etc.), effective January 1, 2027;
  • Reduce the annual tax imposed on new LLCs, limited partnerships, and limited liability partnerships from $800 to $400, but only for their first year of operation for the 2027 through 2029 tax years; and
  • Impose a 100% tax on any settlement fund payments received by taxpayers during the 2026 through 2029 tax years from any anti-weaponization settlement fund established by the federal Department of Justice.

Both bills would also make permanent the $5 million cap on business credits, currently scheduled to expire at the end of the 2026 tax year, but in different forms:

  • AB/SB 176 would enact a new permanent business credit cap equal to the greater of $5 million or 50% of the total taxes imposed, effective beginning with the 2027 tax year; and
  • AB/SB 122 would, in contrast, extend the current $5 million business credit cap (without a percentage-based limit) through the 2029 tax year, and then impose a permanent business credit cap equal to the greater of $5 million or 70% of the total taxes imposed, beginning with the 2030 tax year.

Neither bill would extend the current NOL suspension. This means the NOL suspension continues to be scheduled to expire at the end of the 2026 tax year.

Not included in the budget deal is Governor Newsom’s proposal to conform to the federal tax treatment of Trump accounts. However, this may still be included in subsequent legislation.

Under the California Constitution, the Legislature must pass the budget by midnight tonight.

Sign up for Spidell’s Quarterly Tax Update webinar to stay ahead of the curve and get quarterly updates all year.

Sign up for Spidell’s Flash E-mail — Get breaking news delivered to your inbox, plus other free analysis and information for tax professionals. Join our community and stay at the top of your game. Click here to sign up.

Increased taxes included in California budget deal

Today, the California Legislature is scheduled to vote on a budget deal that could raise over $1.4 billion in new taxes for the 2026–27 fiscal year. There are two competing versions of the tax proposals included in the budget deal (AB/SB 122 vs. AB/SB 176), and at this stage it is unclear which will pass.

Both proposals would, if enacted:

  • Impose sales and use taxes on purchases of digitally delivered prewritten software, which includes software as a service (SaaS; products such as Slack, Zoom, tax software, etc.), effective January 1, 2027;
  • Reduce the annual tax imposed on new LLCs, limited partnerships, and limited liability partnerships from $800 to $400, but only for their first year of operation for the 2027 through 2029 tax years; and
  • Impose a 100% tax on any settlement fund payments received by taxpayers during the 2026 through 2029 tax years from any anti-weaponization settlement fund established by the federal Department of Justice.

Both bills would also make permanent the $5 million cap on business credits, currently scheduled to expire at the end of the 2026 tax year, but in different forms:

  • AB/SB 176 would enact a new permanent business credit cap equal to the greater of $5 million or 50% of the total taxes imposed, effective beginning with the 2027 tax year; and
  • AB/SB 122 would, in contrast, extend the current $5 million business credit cap (without a percentage-based limit) through the 2029 tax year, and then impose a permanent business credit cap equal to the greater of $5 million or 70% of the total taxes imposed, beginning with the 2030 tax year.

Neither bill would extend the current NOL suspension. This means the NOL suspension continues to be scheduled to expire at the end of the 2026 tax year.

Not included in the budget deal is Governor Newsom’s proposal to conform to the federal tax treatment of Trump accounts. However, this may still be included in subsequent legislation.

Under the California Constitution, the Legislature must pass the budget by midnight tonight.

Sign up for Spidell’s Quarterly Tax Update webinar to stay ahead of the curve and get quarterly updates all year. 

2026-18: IRS unveils new Tax Professional Management Office

The Return Preparer Office (RPO) and the Office of Professional Responsibility (OPR) will be operating under a new Tax Professional Management Office, effective June 28, 2026. (E-news for Tax Professionals, Issue No. 2026-23) According to the IRS, this is being done to simplify and modernize how it interacts with the tax professional community.

This reorganization will not change the distinction between credentialed tax professionals and uncredentialed tax preparers. The RPO and OPR will continue to operate independently and the merger will have no impact on how IRS oversees the tax professional community.

The RPO oversees preparer tax identification numbers (PTINs), enrollment programs, IRS approved continuing education providers, and the Annual Filing Season Program for tax return preparers.

The OPR oversees those professionals who practice before the IRS, such as attorneys, CPAs, and Enrolled Agents to ensure they are in compliance with Treasury Department Circular No. 230, Regulations Governing Practice before the IRS.We do not believe that this merger will not impact the Tax Practitioner Hotline because this is currently overseen by the Taxpayer Services Unit.

We will provide additional information concerning this restructuring as it becomes available.

Sign up for Spidell’s 2026 Summer Tax webinar to stay ahead of key developments with clear explanations and actionable takeaways. Click here and register today.

Sign up for Spidell’s Flash E-mail — Get breaking news delivered to your inbox, plus other free analysis and information for tax professionals. Join our community and stay at the top of your game. Click here to sign up.

IRS unveils new Tax Professional Management Office

The Return Preparer Office (RPO) and the Office of Professional Responsibility (OPR) will be operating under a new Tax Professional Management Office, effective June 28, 2026. (E-news for Tax Professionals, Issue No. 2026-23) According to the IRS, this is being done to simplify and modernize how it interacts with the tax professional community.

This reorganization will not change the distinction between credentialed tax professionals and uncredentialed tax preparers. The RPO and OPR will continue to operate independently and the merger will have no impact on how IRS oversees the tax professional community.

The RPO oversees preparer tax identification numbers (PTINs), enrollment programs, IRS approved continuing education providers, and the Annual Filing Season Program for tax return preparers.

The OPR oversees those professionals who practice before the IRS, such as attorneys, CPAs, and Enrolled Agents to ensure they are in compliance with Treasury Department Circular No. 230, Regulations Governing Practice before the IRS.We do not believe that this merger will not impact the Tax Practitioner Hotline because this is currently overseen by the Taxpayer Services Unit.

We will provide additional information concerning this restructuring as it becomes available.

Sign up for Spidell’s 2026 Summer Tax webinar to stay ahead of key developments with clear explanations and actionable takeaways. Click here and register today.

2026-17: Appeals court rules out-of-state sole proprietor not subject to California tax

A Texas radiologist, operating as a sole proprietor, who received revenue from a medical corporation for reading x-rays sent from California medical facilities was not operating a “unitary business” and therefore was not subject to California taxation. (Garcia-Rojas v. FTB(May 1, 2026) Cal. Ct. of App., First App. Dist., Case No. A172054) The court specifically rejected the Office of Tax Appeal’s (OTA) holding in its precedential opinion Appeal of Bindley, 2019-OTA-179P. In Bindley, the OTA held that an out-of-state screenwriter who sold scripts to a California business was operating a “unitary business” and therefore was required to apportion his business income to California under 18 Cal. Code Regs. §17951-4(c).

Note: Out-of-state sole proprietors are not subject to market-based sourcing rules, which only apply to other types of business entities. Rather, sole proprietors are subject to the personal income tax sourcing rules under 18 Cal. Code Regs. §17951-4(c).

The appellate court in Garcia-Rojas held that a sole proprietor that engages in one business activity and receives compensation from one corporation is not a unitary business because the unitary business concept requires that there be two or more businesses. This is true even though the business’s clients are both inside and outside California.

However, the court did note that it “expresses no opinion as to whether the Board [FTB] can tax Garcia-Rojas under a different legal theory.”

Tax professionals with non-California sole proprietor clients, who have paid tax to California based on the FTB’s unitary theory, should consider filing refund claims or protective refund claims for all open tax years based on the court’s ruling.

Sign up for Spidell’s 2026 Post-Tax Season Update and Review webinar to review, refresh, and arm yourself to tackle extensions. Click here and register today.

Sign up for Spidell’s Flash E-mail — Get breaking news delivered to your inbox, plus other free analysis and information for tax professionals. Join our community and stay at the top of your game. Click here to sign up.

Appeals court rules out-of-state sole proprietor not subject to California tax

A Texas radiologist, operating as a sole proprietor, who received revenue from a medical corporation for reading x-rays sent from California medical facilities was not operating a “unitary business” and therefore was not subject to California taxation. (Garcia-Rojas v. FTB(May 1, 2026) Cal. Ct. of App., First App. Dist., Case No. A172054) The court specifically rejected the Office of Tax Appeal’s (OTA) holding in its precedential opinion Appeal of Bindley, 2019-OTA-179P. In Bindley, the OTA held that an out-of-state screenwriter who sold scripts to a California business was operating a “unitary business” and therefore was required to apportion his business income to California under 18 Cal. Code Regs. §17951-4(c).

Note: Out-of-state sole proprietors are not subject to market-based sourcing rules, which only apply to other types of business entities. Rather, sole proprietors are subject to the personal income tax sourcing rules under 18 Cal. Code Regs. §17951-4(c).

The appellate court in Garcia-Rojas held that a sole proprietor that engages in one business activity and receives compensation from one corporation is not a unitary business because the unitary business concept requires that there be two or more businesses. This is true even though the business’s clients are both inside and outside California.

However, the court did note that it “expresses no opinion as to whether the Board [FTB] can tax Garcia-Rojas under a different legal theory.”

Tax professionals with non-California sole proprietor clients, who have paid tax to California based on the FTB’s unitary theory, should consider filing refund claims or protective refund claims for all open tax years based on the court’s ruling.

Sign up for Spidell’s 2026 Post-Tax Season Update and Review webinar to review, refresh, and arm yourself to tackle extensions. Click here and register today.

2026-16: Deductions can now be claimed for medical marijuana expenses

The Department of Justice issued an order on April 22, 2026, immediately rescheduling FDA-approved marijuana products and state-licensed medical marijuana from Schedule I to Schedule III, which means that:

  • The IRC §280E limitations on cannabis businesses no longer apply; and
  • Taxpayers can now claim a medical expense deduction for marijuana.

The order is available at:

www.justice.gov/opa/media/1437441/dl

The order follows President Trump’s December 18, 2025, executive order directing expedited completion of the cannabis rescheduling.

It’s important to note that the DOJ’s order does not legalize recreational use at the federal level, override state laws, or end all restrictions. This order also does not reclassify recreational cannabis as a Schedule III drug, which means the IRC §280E limitations still apply and these items do not qualify for medical expense deductions.

However, the Department is expediting the ongoing rulemaking process to fully remove marijuana from Schedule I and place it into Schedule III and will hold an administrative hearing on this issue beginning June 29, 2026.

In the meantime, we assume that taxpayers will be able to begin claiming medical marijuana business expenses and medical expense deductions as of April 22, 2026, but we await IRS guidance to confirm. We will continue to update you as news develops.

Sign up for Spidell’s 2026 Post-Tax Season Update and Review webinar to review, refresh, and arm yourself to tackle extensions. Click here and register today.

Sign up for Spidell’s Flash E-mail — Get breaking news delivered to your inbox, plus other free analysis and information for tax professionals. Join our community and stay at the top of your game. Click here to sign up.

Deductions can now be claimed for medical marijuana expenses

The Department of Justice issued an order on April 22, 2026, immediately rescheduling FDA-approved marijuana products and state-licensed medical marijuana from Schedule I to Schedule III, which means that:

  • The IRC §280E limitations on cannabis businesses no longer apply; and
  • Taxpayers can now claim a medical expense deduction for marijuana.

The order is available at:

www.justice.gov/opa/media/1437441/dl

The order follows President Trump’s December 18, 2025, executive order directing expedited completion of the cannabis rescheduling.

It’s important to note that the DOJ’s order does not legalize recreational use at the federal level, override state laws, or end all restrictions. This order also does not reclassify recreational cannabis as a Schedule III drug, which means the IRC §280E limitations still apply and these items do not qualify for medical expense deductions.

However, the Department is expediting the ongoing rulemaking process to fully remove marijuana from Schedule I and place it into Schedule III and will hold an administrative hearing on this issue beginning June 29, 2026.

In the meantime, we assume that taxpayers will be able to begin claiming medical marijuana business expenses and medical expense deductions as of April 22, 2026, but we await IRS guidance to confirm. We will continue to update you as news develops.

Sign up for Spidell’s 2026 Post-Tax Season Update and Review webinar to review, refresh, and arm yourself to tackle extensions. Click here and register today.

2026-15: Customs Border Patrol to start processing IEEPA tariff refunds on April 20

On April 20, 2026, importers and brokers can start filing for refunds of the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA) tariffs imposed by the Trump administration and struck down by the U.S. Supreme Court in Learning Resources, Inc. v. Trump (February 20, 2026) U.S. Supreme Court, Case No. 24-1287.

The Customs Border Patrol (CBP) has established a multi-phase process for issuing refunds. During the first phase CBP is accepting claims for unliquidated tariffs (aka nonfinalized) and recently liquidated entries still within the 80-day reliquidation period.

Payees must apply for these refunds electronically by submitting a declaration/application through a new Consolidated Administration and Processing of Entries (CAPE) tab in CBP’s Automated Commercial Environment system. Refunds, along with interest, will be issued electronically within 60–90 days of the CAPE declaration’s acceptance.

Additional information is available on the CBP’s website at:

www.cbp.gov/trade/programs-administration/trade-remedies/ieepa-duty-refunds

Sign up for Spidell’s 2026 Post-Tax Season Update and Review webinar to learn more about these tariff refunds and their tax treatment. Click here and register today.

Sign up for Spidell’s Flash E-mail — Get breaking news delivered to your inbox, plus other free analysis and information for tax professionals. Join our community and stay at the top of your game. Click here to sign up.

Customs Border Patrol to start processing IEEPA tariff refunds on April 20

On April 20, 2026, importers and brokers can start filing for refunds of the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA) tariffs imposed by the Trump administration and struck down by the U.S. Supreme Court in Learning Resources, Inc. v. Trump (February 20, 2026) U.S. Supreme Court, Case No. 24-1287.

The Customs Border Patrol (CBP) has established a multi-phase process for issuing refunds. During the first phase CBP is accepting claims for unliquidated tariffs (aka nonfinalized) and recently liquidated entries still within the 80-day reliquidation period.

Payees must apply for these refunds electronically by submitting a declaration/application through a new Consolidated Administration and Processing of Entries (CAPE) tab in CBP’s Automated Commercial Environment system. Refunds, along with interest, will be issued electronically within 60–90 days of the CAPE declaration’s acceptance.

Additional information is available on the CBP’s website at:

www.cbp.gov/trade/programs-administration/trade-remedies/ieepa-duty-refunds

Sign up for Spidell’s 2026 Post-Tax Season Update and Review webinar to learn more about these tariff refunds and their tax treatment. Click here and register today.

2026-14: Settlement reached in LLC class action

The FTB has finally entered into a class action settlement agreement to refund the $800 minimum franchise tax, penalties, and interest paid by out-of-state passive investors in LLCs doing business in California. (Bahl Media LLC v. FTB, San Francisco Superior Court, Case No. CGC-16-554150) However, the FTB “denies any wrongdoing or liability in connection with any facts or claims” alleged in the case.

The settlement follows years of FTB resistance to refund claims stemming from Swart Enterprises, where the court held that a 0.2% passive interest in a manager-managed California LLC did not constitute “doing business” in California. (Swart Enterprises, Inc. v. FTB (2017) 7 Cal.App.5th 497)

This resulted in the Bahl class action suit. Members on the “class list” prepared during the litigation have previously been notified that they were on the class list, and will automatically receive refunds, unless they opt out.

Members of the class are taxpayers who:

  • Paid the minimum tax and related interest and penalties, if any, to the FTB;
  • Timely field a refund claim of the amounts paid;
  • Either had their refund claimed denied after June 10, 2016, and before July 21, 2023 (the date of class certification), or did not have their claim approved or denied at least six months prior to July 21, 2023;
  • Are not doing business in California because their only connection to California is holding a passive interest in an LLC doing business in California; and
  • Only held a 50% or less interest in an LLC doing business in California.

If you have a client who was not notified, but meets the requirements listed above, see the terms of the settlement agreement for instructions on filing a claim:

www.ftb.ca.gov/tax-pros/law/Preliminarily-approved-bahl-settlement-agreement-w-addendum.pdf

Or see the FTB’s Notice of Proposed Settlement of Class Action:

www.ftb.ca.gov/tax-pros/law/Bahl-media-vs-FTB-notice-of-proposed-settlement.pdf

Sign up for Spidell’s 2026 Post-Tax Season Update and Review webinar to review, refresh, and arm yourself to tackle extensions. Click here and register today.

Sign up for Spidell’s Flash E-mail — Get breaking news delivered to your inbox, plus other free analysis and information for tax professionals. Join our community and stay at the top of your game. Click here to sign up.

 

Settlement reached in LLC class action

The FTB has finally entered into a class action settlement agreement to refund the $800 minimum franchise tax, penalties, and interest paid by out-of-state passive investors in LLCs doing business in California. (Bahl Media LLC v. FTB, San Francisco Superior Court, Case No. CGC-16-554150) However, the FTB “denies any wrongdoing or liability in connection with any facts or claims” alleged in the case.

The settlement follows years of FTB resistance to refund claims stemming from Swart Enterprises, where the court held that a 0.2% passive interest in a manager-managed California LLC did not constitute “doing business” in California. (Swart Enterprises, Inc. v. FTB (2017) 7 Cal.App.5th 497)

This resulted in the Bahl class action suit. Members on the “class list” prepared during the litigation have previously been notified that they were on the class list, and will automatically receive refunds, unless they opt out.

Members of the class are taxpayers who:

  • Paid the minimum tax and related interest and penalties, if any, to the FTB;
  • Timely field a refund claim of the amounts paid;
  • Either had their refund claimed denied after June 10, 2016, and before July 21, 2023 (the date of class certification), or did not have their claim approved or denied at least six months prior to July 21, 2023;
  • Are not doing business in California because their only connection to California is holding a passive interest in an LLC doing business in California; and
  • Only held a 50% or less interest in an LLC doing business in California.

If you have a client who was not notified, but meets the requirements listed above, see the terms of the settlement agreement for instructions on filing a claim:

www.ftb.ca.gov/tax-pros/law/Preliminarily-approved-bahl-settlement-agreement-w-addendum.pdf

Or see the FTB’s Notice of Proposed Settlement of Class Action:

www.ftb.ca.gov/tax-pros/law/Bahl-media-vs-FTB-notice-of-proposed-settlement.pdf

Sign up for Spidell’s 2026 Post-Tax Season Update and Review webinar to review, refresh, and arm yourself to tackle extensions. Click here and register today.

2026-13: Qualified tips deduction final regulation adopted

The IRS has released final Treas. Regs. §1.224-1 that:

  • Defines qualified tips for purposes of the deduction;
  • Provides a complete listing of qualified occupations and their corresponding codes (aka Treasury Tipped Occupations Codes (TTOCs)). These are essentially the same as the original proposed list with the addition of TTOCs for floral designers, visual artists, and gas pump attendants as well as more “illustrative examples” of the 70 or so TTOC categories; and
  • Continues to defer providing guidance regarding the IRC §224 specified service trade or business exclusion, which means that the transitional relief provided in IRS Notice 2025-69 still applies and taxpayers will continue to qualify for the tips deduction even if they or their employer are engaged in an SSTB as defined in IRC §199A.

The final regulations generally retain the IRS’s position outlined in the proposed regulations concerning what is a qualified tip and what is a cash tip (only cash tips continue to qualify, including cash tips paid electronically), with additional clarifications as noted below.

The following are some of the more interesting items included in the final regulation and its accompanying supplementary information:

  • The definition of “cash tips” from the proposed regulations is modified to exclude all digital assets (as defined in IRC §6045(g)(3)(D) and Treas. Regs. §1.6045-1(a)(19)) such as bitcoin, stablecoins, etc. However, tips paid with credit and debit card transactions and through payment apps such as Venmo or Zelle still qualify,  as do tips paid in foreign currency;
  • Additional examples are provided clarifying:
    • Whether a tip is mandatory or voluntary for different types of point of sale (POS) systems and contracts for services; and
    • When payments to digital service providers are treated as compensation or deductible tips, including how digital rewards are treated and the impact of audience engagement mechanisms;
  • The IRS makes clear that the job descriptions included in the TTOC chart are “illustrative” only and are not an “exhaustive list,” which means taxpayers working in certain jobs may still qualify for the deduction even if the job is not specifically listed;
  • The IRS stated that whether the self-employed health insurance deduction, the one-half of self-employment tax deduction, and the self-employed retirement deduction should be deducted for purposes of determining the net income limitation for self-employed taxpayers is beyond the scope of the regulation. Remember that the original version of the Schedule 1-A instructions did not require these items to be deducted for purposes of calculating the net income limitation, whereas the current instructions do; and
  • Taxpayers who are involved in the cannabis industry are engaged in an illegal activity under federal law and are therefore ineligible for the deduction even if they are engaged in an occupation that is otherwise listed in the TTOC chart and cannabis is legal in the state in which they work.

The final regulations maintain the positions that:

  • Self-employed taxpayers can only claim the deduction for tips included on Form 1099; and
  • Partners cannot claim a deduction for tips reported on an information return provided to the partnership.

Sign up for Spidell’s 2026 Post-Tax Season Update and Review webinar for more details on these provisions, and to review, refresh, and arm yourself to tackle extensions. Click here and register today.

Sign up for Spidell’s Flash E-mail — Get breaking news delivered to your inbox, plus other free analysis and information for tax professionals. Join our community and stay at the top of your game. Click here to sign up.

Qualified tips deduction final regulation adopted

The IRS has released final Treas. Regs. §1.224-1 that:

  • Defines qualified tips for purposes of the deduction;
  • Provides a complete listing of qualified occupations and their corresponding codes (aka Treasury Tipped Occupations Codes (TTOCs)). These are essentially the same as the original proposed list with the addition of TTOCs for floral designers, visual artists, and gas pump attendants as well as more “illustrative examples” of the 70 or so TTOC categories; and
  • Continues to defer providing guidance regarding the IRC §224 specified service trade or business exclusion, which means that the transitional relief provided in IRS Notice 2025-69 still applies and taxpayers will continue to qualify for the tips deduction even if they or their employer are engaged in an SSTB as defined in IRC §199A.

The final regulations generally retain the IRS’s position outlined in the proposed regulations concerning what is a qualified tip and what is a cash tip (only cash tips continue to qualify, including cash tips paid electronically), with additional clarifications as noted below.

The following are some of the more interesting items included in the final regulation and its accompanying supplementary information:

  • The definition of “cash tips” from the proposed regulations is modified to exclude all digital assets (as defined in IRC §6045(g)(3)(D) and Treas. Regs. §1.6045-1(a)(19)) such as bitcoin, stablecoins, etc. However, tips paid with credit and debit card transactions and through payment apps such as Venmo or Zelle still qualify,  as do tips paid in foreign currency;
  • Additional examples are provided clarifying:
    • Whether a tip is mandatory or voluntary for different types of point of sale (POS) systems and contracts for services; and
    • When payments to digital service providers are treated as compensation or deductible tips, including how digital rewards are treated and the impact of audience engagement mechanisms;
  • The IRS makes clear that the job descriptions included in the TTOC chart are “illustrative” only and are not an “exhaustive list,” which means taxpayers working in certain jobs may still qualify for the deduction even if the job is not specifically listed;
  • The IRS stated that whether the self-employed health insurance deduction, the one-half of self-employment tax deduction, and the self-employed retirement deduction should be deducted for purposes of determining the net income limitation for self-employed taxpayers is beyond the scope of the regulation. Remember that the original version of the Schedule 1-A instructions did not require these items to be deducted for purposes of calculating the net income limitation, whereas the current instructions do; and
  • Taxpayers who are involved in the cannabis industry are engaged in an illegal activity under federal law and are therefore ineligible for the deduction even if they are engaged in an occupation that is otherwise listed in the TTOC chart and cannabis is legal in the state in which they work.

The final regulations maintain the positions that:

  • Self-employed taxpayers can only claim the deduction for tips included on Form 1099; and
  • Partners cannot claim a deduction for tips reported on an information return provided to the partnership.

Sign up for Spidell’s 2026 Post-Tax Season Update and Review webinar for more details on these provisions, and to review, refresh, and arm yourself to tackle extensions. Click here and register today.

Estimated tax underpayment relief provided to farmers and fishermen

Farmers and fishermen will not be subject to an addition to tax for failure to make an estimated tax payment for 2025 as long as they file a calendar-year 2025 tax return and pay any tax due by April 15, 2026. (IRS Notice 2026-24)

Special estimated tax rules normally apply to qualified farmers and fishermen. Rather than paying four equal estimated tax payments throughout the year, qualified farmers and fishermen (those with two-thirds of their total gross income from farming or fishing) can make one single estimated tax payment on January 15 following the close of their taxable year. No addition to tax is applied if the taxpayer files the return and pays the full amount of tax reported by March 1.

However, many farmers and fishermen were unable to make the March 1 deadline due to difficulties with Form 8995, Qualified Business Income Deduction Simplified Computation, which was not corrected until a February 23, 2026, software update.

The tax relief will be automatically applied if the taxpayer files the return and pays any tax due by April 15, 2026. The IRS will not issue any notices for underpayment of estimated tax. Those farmers and fishermen who already filed and reported an addition to tax can request abatement by filing Form 843, Claim for Refund and Request for Abatement, and following the instructions provided in the notice.

Sign up for Spidell’s 2026 Post-Tax Season Update and Review webinar to review, refresh, and arm yourself to tackle extensions. Click here and register today.

2026-12: Estimated tax underpayment relief provided to farmers and fishermen

Farmers and fishermen will not be subject to an addition to tax for failure to make an estimated tax payment for 2025 as long as they file a calendar-year 2025 tax return and pay any tax due by April 15, 2026. (IRS Notice 2026-24)

Special estimated tax rules normally apply to qualified farmers and fishermen. Rather than paying four equal estimated tax payments throughout the year, qualified farmers and fishermen (those with two-thirds of their total gross income from farming or fishing) can make one single estimated tax payment on January 15 following the close of their taxable year. No addition to tax is applied if the taxpayer files the return and pays the full amount of tax reported by March 1.

However, many farmers and fishermen were unable to make the March 1 deadline due to difficulties with Form 8995, Qualified Business Income Deduction Simplified Computation, which was not corrected until a February 23, 2026, software update.

The tax relief will be automatically applied if the taxpayer files the return and pays any tax due by April 15, 2026. The IRS will not issue any notices for underpayment of estimated tax. Those farmers and fishermen who already filed and reported an addition to tax can request abatement by filing Form 843, Claim for Refund and Request for Abatement, and following the instructions provided in the notice.

Sign up for Spidell’s 2026 Post-Tax Season Update and Review webinar to review, refresh, and arm yourself to tackle extensions. Click here and register today.

Sign up for Spidell’s Flash E-mail — Get breaking news delivered to your inbox, plus other free analysis and information for tax professionals. Join our community and stay at the top of your game. Click here to sign up.

2025-8: BOI reporting remains “voluntary” for time being

According to an alert posted on FinCEN’s beneficial ownership information (BOI) reporting webpage, BOI reporting is still voluntary for now despite the U.S. Supreme Court’s stay of the preliminary injunction issued by a federal district court in Texas Top Cop Shop Inc. v. McHenry. ((January 23, 2025) U.S. Supreme Court, Case No. 24A653)

This is because another judge in a separate case has also issued a nationwide injunction against the BOI reporting requirements. (Smith v. U.S. Department of Treasury (January 7, 2025) U.S. Dist. Court, Eastern Dist. of Texas, Case No. 6:24-CV-336)) To date, the Department of Justice has not filed an appeal in Smith. It is not known whether the new administration will appeal the case.

This means that, for now, businesses are not required to file BOI reports and cannot be penalized for failing to do so.

It is also important to note that two bills (HR 425 and S 100) have been introduced in Congress to repeal the Corporate Transparency Act, which created the BOI reporting mandate.

We will keep you apprised of any further developments as they occur.


Sign up for Spidell’s 2024/25 Federal and California Tax Update and stay on top of late-breaking news. Click here for details.

Sign up for Spidell’s Flash E-mail — Get breaking news delivered to your inbox, plus other free analysis and information for tax professionals. Join our community and stay at the top of your game. Click here to sign up.

Posted in Uncategorized

BOI reporting remains “voluntary” for time being

According to an alert posted on FinCEN’s beneficial ownership information (BOI) reporting webpage, BOI reporting is still voluntary for now despite the U.S. Supreme Court’s stay of the preliminary injunction issued by a federal district court in Texas Top Cop Shop Inc. v. McHenry. ((January 23, 2025) U.S. Supreme Court, Case No. 24A653)

This is because another judge in a separate case has also issued a nationwide injunction against the BOI reporting requirements. (Smith v. U.S. Department of Treasury (January 7, 2025) U.S. Dist. Court, Eastern Dist. of Texas, Case No. 6:24-CV-336)) To date, the Department of Justice has not filed an appeal in Smith. It is not known whether the new administration will appeal the case.

This means that, for now, businesses are not required to file BOI reports and cannot be penalized for failing to do so.

It is also important to note that two bills (HR 425 and S 100) have been introduced in Congress to repeal the Corporate Transparency Act, which created the BOI reporting mandate.

We will keep you apprised of any further developments as they occur.


Sign up for Spidell’s 2024/25 Federal and California Tax Update and stay on top of late-breaking news. Click here for details.

Posted in Uncategorized

2025-7: U.S. Supreme Court lifts BOI mandate injunction

Today, the U.S. Supreme Court stayed the order from the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals that reinstated the lower court’s nationwide injunction against the beneficial ownership information (BOI) reporting requirement. (McHenry v. Texas Top Cop Shop, Inc. (January 23, 2025) U.S. Supreme Court, Case No. 24A653)

FinCEN has yet to issue any additional guidance after the U.S. Supreme Court’s ruling, so it is unclear at this point whether businesses will be required to comply with the BOI reporting mandate. We anticipate we will hear more from FinCEN and/or Congress shortly and will keep you apprised of any further developments.


Sign up for Spidell’s 2024/25 Federal and California Tax Update and stay on top of late-breaking news. Click here for details.

Sign up for Spidell’s Flash E-mail — Get breaking news delivered to your inbox, plus other free analysis and information for tax professionals. Join our community and stay at the top of your game. Click here to sign up.

Posted in Uncategorized

U.S. Supreme Court lifts BOI mandate injunction

Today, the U.S. Supreme Court stayed the order from the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals that reinstated the lower court’s nationwide injunction against the beneficial ownership information (BOI) reporting requirement. (McHenry v. Texas Top Cop Shop, Inc. (January 23, 2025) U.S. Supreme Court, Case No. 24A653)

FinCEN has yet to issue any additional guidance after the U.S. Supreme Court’s ruling, so it is unclear at this point whether businesses will be required to comply with the BOI reporting mandate. We anticipate we will hear more from FinCEN and/or Congress shortly and will keep you apprised of any further developments.


Sign up for Spidell’s 2024/25 Federal and California Tax Update and stay on top of late-breaking news. Click here for details.

Posted in Uncategorized

2024-59: Senate sends disaster relief and wildfire settlement exclusion bill to President

The Senate has passed the Federal Disaster Tax Relief Act of 2023 (H.R. 5863).

If enacted, the bill would:

  • Exclude from gross income qualified wildfire relief payments paid to individuals as compensation (other than insurance payments) for losses, expenses, or damages for any wildfire declared a federal disaster after December 31, 2014 (§3, H.R. 5863);
  • Treat disaster relief payments to victims of the East Palestine, Ohio, train derailment as excludable IRC §139(b) payments (§3, H.R. 5863); and
  • Allow individual victims with a net disaster loss from any taxable year to claim an enhanced personal casualty loss under IRC §165(h) for certain federally declared disasters that occurred after February 24, 2021. (§2, H.R. 5863)

The bill previously passed the House and will now be sent to the President. It is expected that President Biden will sign the bill.

The text of the bill is available at:

www.congress.gov/bill/118th-congress/house-bill/5863/text


Sign up for Spidell’s 2024/25 Federal and California Tax Update and stay on top of late-breaking news. Click here for details.

Sign up for Spidell’s Flash E-mail — Get breaking news delivered to your inbox, plus other free analysis and information for tax professionals. Join our community and stay at the top of your game. Click here to sign up.

Posted in Uncategorized

2024-58: Court puts BOI reporting on hold for all businesses

A federal district court in Texas issued a nationwide preliminary injunction against enforcing the beneficial ownership reporting requirements mandated by the Corporate Transparency Act (CTA). (Texas Top Cop Shop v. Garland (December 3, 2024) U.S. Dist. Ct., Eastern Dist. of Texas, Case No. 4:24-CV-478)

The court ruled that Congress exceeded its authority in enacting the CTA, resulting in an unconstitutional infringement on states’ rights to regulate businesses. The court granted a nationwide injunction prohibiting FinCEN from enforcing the January 1, 2025, reporting deadline for all reporting companies.

The opinion was issued on December 3, 2024, and will likely be appealed. However, for now, businesses do not have to file beneficial ownership information reports with FinCEN.

We will continue to update you as news develops on this issue.

The opinion is available at:

www.spidell.com/files/2024/ttcsvgarland.pdf


Sign up for Spidell’s 2024/25 Federal and California Tax Update and stay on top of late-breaking news. Click here for details.

Sign up for Spidell’s Flash E-mail — Get breaking news delivered to your inbox, plus other free analysis and information for tax professionals. Join our community and stay at the top of your game. Click here to sign up.

Posted in Uncategorized

Fraud Friday: Garbage to gold

Lucent Polymers, Inc. discovered a way to turn “garbage to gold” by using recycled and scrap materials to create high-quality plastics that were flame-resistant and extremely strong. Unfortunately, the business model was a total sham. The flame-resistant products routinely caught fire and impact-resistant materials were too brittle and shattered. But the company’s founders hid this from potential buyers by providing them with falsified lab tests that shows the products performed as claimed. After the company sold twice in quick succession, the SEC caught wind and the founders have been convicted of securities fraud and money laundering.

(https://resource-recycling.com/plastics/2021/03/31/lucent-execs-sentenced-for-federal-crimes/)

CPAs, get four hours of fraud CPE with our Fraud Essentials for CPAs WebinarClick here for more information.

Fraud Friday: Fancy colored diamonds

The founder of Argyle Coin, a virtual currency that was allegedly backed by “fancy colored diamonds” received a seven-year sentence and will pay $23 million in restitution for defrauding investors. Argyle Coin, LLC was created when the founder’s prior diamond-selling scam had started to unravel, and he used money from investors in his new “high return, no risk” digital currency to pay off existing investors. He also managed to siphon away $10 million for himself to spend on a house, shopping at Gucci, purchasing horses, and riding lessons for his adult son.

(https://coingeek.com/argyle-coin-founder-involved-in-25m-scam-gets-7-years-in-jail/)

CPAs, get four hours of fraud CPE with our Fraud Essentials for CPAs WebinarClick here for more information.

Fraud Friday: 300 B.C.

One of the earliest recorded instances of fraud took place in 300 B.C. Two Greek merchants, Hegestratos and Zenosthemis, took out an insurance policy and borrowed money on a cargo ship that was allegedly going to be filled with corn, but their plan was to sink the boat, keep the money, and sell the corn elsewhere. As Hegestratos was attempting to chop a hole in the hull of the boat with an axe, one of the crew members discovered him. Hegestratos attempted to escape by jumping off the boat and trying to swim to shore, but he drown at sea; Zenosthemis was tried in an Athenian court.

(www.investopedia.com/articles/financial-theory/09/history-of-fraud.asp)

CPAs, get four hours of fraud CPE with our Fraud Essentials for CPAs WebinarClick here for more information.

Fraud Friday: Celebrity attorney Michael Avenatti

Celebrity attorney Michael Avenatti was sentenced to 168 months in prison for wire fraud and endeavoring to obstruct the administration of the Internal Revenue Code. He was also ordered to pay $10 million in restitution to four clients and the IRS. Avenatti received funds for his clients and placed them into client trust accounts, but then misappropriated the funds to finance an extravagant lifestyle. He then lied to clients about the terms of their settlement or whether he had received their funds. In one case, Avenatti drained a client’s trust account to fund his own coffee business; in another case, he used the bulk of a client’s settlement to purchase a private jet. Regarding the obstruction charge, Avenatti lied to IRS agents, and changed his company’s name, EIN, and bank information to avoid IRS levies.

(www.justice.gov/usao-cdca/pr/lawyer-michael-avenatti-sentenced-14-years-federal-prison-stealing-millions-dollars)

CPAs, get four hours of fraud CPE with our Fraud Essentials for CPAs WebinarClick here for more information.

Fraud Friday: CAR-HIT-U

A Detroit-area personal injury attorney known for his 855-CAR-HIT-U billboards has been convicted for tax fraud for failing to report over $2.6 million in income. He concealed the funds by placing them in undisclosed Interest on Lawyer’s Trust Accounts, which are used to hold funds on behalf of clients. He failed to disclose these accounts to the Michigan State Bar Foundation and his tax return preparer. He’s facing prison time plus penalties for each count.

(www.detroitnews.com/story/news/local/michigan/2022/11/19/metro-detroit-personal-injury-attorney-convicted-of-tax-fraud/69662737007/)

CPAs, get four hours of fraud CPE with our Fraud Essentials for CPAs WebinarClick here for more information.

Fraud Friday: Tax (fraud) preparation manual

A Texas tax preparer and his two children were convicted for defrauding the U.S. after filing false tax returns to inflate their clients’ refunds. They fabricated clients’ Schedule A, itemized deductions, and Schedule C, sole proprietorship profit and loss statements, claiming the taxpayer owned a business when no such business existed, claiming unreimbursed employee expenses such as travel and per diem, and claiming business expenses that were never incurred. The company also had a “tax preparation manual,” which was a handbook that outlined exactly how to commit fraud. The manual advised tax preparers to manipulate income to maximize refunds rather than referring to the law to determine whether an activity was a business for income tax purposes and whether expenses properly qualified as a business deduction.

(www.justice.gov/usao-ndtx/pr/san-angelo-tax-preparer-sentenced-14-years-tax-fraud)

CPAs, get four hours of fraud CPE with our Fraud Essentials for CPAs WebinarClick here for more information.

Fraud Friday: 13,000 lottery “wins”

A man who has “won” the Massachusetts lottery in excess of 13,000 times has pleaded guilty to charges of tax fraud conspiracy, money laundering conspiracy, and filing false tax returns. The man and family members operated a lottery ticket cashing scheme that brought in $21 million between 2011 and 2019. In Massachusetts, money owed in federal taxes or child support can be deducted from lottery wins over $600. To avoid this deduction, winners often use underground ticket cashing businesses, which take a cut of the winnings. The family members reported fraudulent gambling losses and understated their income, resulting in large refunds. 

(www.casino.org/news/mass-lottery-frequent-winner-pleads-guilty-to-tax-fraud-conspiracy/)

CPAs, get four hours of fraud CPE with our Fraud Essentials for CPAs WebinarClick here for more information.

Fraud Friday: The Nigerian Prince e-mail scam

The Nigerian Prince e-mail scam is a modern interpretation of the Spanish Prisoner scam that dates back to the late 18th century. Originally, businessmen were contacted by an individual allegedly trying to smuggle someone connected to a wealthy family out of a prison in Spain. The scammer promised to share money with the victim in exchange for a small amount of money up front to bribe prison guards. The scam has persisted, shifting to requests for assistance purportedly coming from a Nigerian prince. While Nigeria is most often the nation referred to in these scams, they originate in other nations as well. The scam is also known as the “419 scam”; 419 refers to the article of the Nigerian Criminal Code dealing with fraud (in Chapter 38: “Obtaining property by false pretenses; Cheating”).

(https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Advance-fee_scam)

CPAs, get four hours of fraud CPE with our Fraud Essentials for CPAs WebinarClick here for more information.

Fraud Friday: Rap duo

Two female Detroit rappers (known on stage as Deuces Wild) are charged with identity theft and conspiracy for a scheme going back to 2013 that involved filing fraudulent estate and trust tax returns claiming $13.6 million, of which they had already received more than $5 million. The duo filed 122 returns, opened 29 bank accounts, and roped friends and acquaintances into the scheme by promising them a cut of the money in exchange for receiving checks. One of the women used stolen identification to open accounts, rent apartments, open a UPS Box, and purchase expensive items, including jewelry and watches. Both women are facing ten years in prison if convicted.

(www.fox2detroit.com/news/metro-detroit-rappers-charged-with-stealing-over-5-million-from-irs)

CPAs, get four hours of fraud CPE with our Fraud Essentials for CPAs WebinarClick here for more information.

Fraud Friday: Julia Butterfly

“Tax redirection” is a form of tax rebellion where the individual pays their tax directly to another source rather than the IRS as a form of protest. Julia “Butterfly” Hill, an environmentalist turned proponent of tax redirection, sent about $150,000 in federal taxes directly to schools, arts and culture programs, community gardens, and other recipients, stating in a letter to the IRS, “I’m not refusing to pay my taxes. I’m actually paying them but I’m paying them where they belong because you refuse to do so.” Hill is best known for her tree sit in the late 1990s, when she lived in a 180-foot tall Redwood tree named Luna for 738 days to protect it from being cut down by the Pacific Lumber Company.

(https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Julia_Butterfly_Hill)

CPAs, get four hours of fraud CPE with our Fraud Essentials for CPAs WebinarClick here for more information.

Fraud Friday: The Whiskey Rebellion

In 1791, Treasury Secretary Alexander Hamilton proposed the first U.S. tax, an excise on distilled spirits, to pay down the debt incurred from the American Revolution. Large whiskey producers paid the tax annually at a rate of six cents per gallon, with further tax breaks the more they produced. But small producers were charged nine cents per gallon in taxes. Farmers in western Pennsylvania who used whiskey for trade objected to the tax and protested by tarring and feathering the tax collectors. The rebellion lasted from 1791 to 1794, ending with a confrontation that caused President George Washington to send 13,000 troops to contain what some feared would become another revolution. (www.history.com/topics/early-us/whiskey-rebellion)

CPAs, get four hours of fraud CPE with our Fraud Essentials for CPAs WebinarClick here for more information.

Fraud Friday: “Illegal tax protestors”

Tax protestors rely on various arguments, such as the Sixteenth Amendment not being properly ratified, income is not defined in the Internal Revenue Code or the Constitution, or that the Internal Revenue Code actually doesn’t require anyone to pay tax. Prior to 1998, the IRS would label such individuals as “illegal tax protestors” in their system to flag them for enforcement actions and alert IRS employees to be cautious in dealing with them. But in 1998, Congress passed the Internal Revenue Service Restructuring and Reform Act of 1998 (P.L. 105-206) prohibiting the IRS from continuing this practice because it stigmatized these individuals and biased IRS employees against them, even if they had ultimately paid their tax.

(www.washingtonpost.com/news/federal-eye/wp/2014/09/11/what-is-an-illegal-tax-protester-and-why-cant-the-irs-use-that-term-any-more/)

CPAs, get four hours of fraud CPE with our Fraud Essentials for CPAs WebinarClick here for more information.

Fraud Friday: In the doghouse

A Minnesota dog breeder is in the doghouse after an investigation discovered that they were reporting income on their tax returns from fewer sales of puppies than they actually made in the years at issue. The Facebook page for BrookeMarie’s Goldendoodle Love clearly showed the number of litters and how many total puppies were for sale, which did not match up with the amounts reported. The puppies were going for between $2,500 and $3,500 each, plus there should have been charged 7% Minnesota sales tax, which the breeder also failed to pay. The owner has been charged with three felony counts of filing fraudulent income and sales tax returns and failing to pay or collect income and sales tax.

(www.southernminnesotanews.com/dog-breeder-accused-of-tax-fraud/)

CPAs, get four hours of fraud CPE with our Fraud Essentials for CPAs WebinarClick here for more information.

Fraud Friday: $62 million in Paycheck Protection Program fraud

A California tax preparer was sentenced to ten years in prison for orchestrating a scheme that defrauded the Paycheck Protection Program out of $62 million. At the time he engaged in the fraud, he was on supervised release for a previous fraud scheme in which he filed false income tax returns on behalf of more than nine professional athletes. In the PPP scam, he filed false applications for PPP loans on behalf of small businesses and shell companies in exchange for 30% of the loan proceeds. He also filed fraudulent supporting tax returns that the small business owners never saw or approved. To hide the funds he received from the scam, he asked the businesses to pay the fee with cashier’s checks and to write “payroll” in the memo line.

(www.wric.com/news/crime/man-sentenced-for-tax-fraud-schemes-resulting-in-more-than-62-million-loss-for-us-government/)

CPAs, get four hours of fraud CPE with our Fraud Essentials for CPAs WebinarClick here for more information.

Fraud Friday: Distributing false resale certificates

Sotheby’s auction house is under investigation in New York for allegedly distributing false resale certificates to around a dozen clients, allowing them to pose as art dealers and avoid paying tax on revenue from their sales. The scheme is related to a lawsuit in which a Sotheby’s client purchased $27 million in art for his personal collection in transactions that avoided tax. Initially, it seemed this was an isolated incident, but further investigation revealed multiple fraudulent resale certificates, indicating that staff at Sotheby’s had “willfully turned a blind eye to the fraudulent distribution of resale certificates.” Sotheby’s argues it shouldn’t be held responsible for the actions of low-level employees. (www.artnews.com/art-news/news/sothebys-tax-fraud-investigation-expands-1234637480/)

CPAs, get four hours of fraud CPE with our Fraud Essentials for CPAs WebinarClick here for more information.

Fraud Friday: AI pool-finding

France is using AI to find undeclared swimming pools, which so far has generated 10 million in tax. In France, a swimming pool can affect tax because housing taxes are calculated based on a property’s rental value. Since the beginning of the pandemic, and with recent heat waves affecting Europe, the number of pools in France has greatly increased. The AI pool-finding project so far has only covered nine of France’s 96 metropolitan areas, but it has already discovered 20,356 undeclared swimming pools. The French tax office DGFiP (a.k.a., Le Fisc) estimates it can bring in an additional €40 million in tax once it’s finished using AI to analyze the rest of metropolitan France. (www.theverge.com/2022/8/30/23328442/france-ai-swimming-pool-tax-aerial-photos)

CPAs, get four hours of fraud CPE with our Fraud Essentials for CPAs WebinarClick here for more information.

Fraud Friday: Romanian taxes on imported diesel fuel

The U.S. will return $1.2 million in forfeited funds to Romania, stemming from a tax fraud scheme involving diesel fuel. A Romanian couple avoided Romanian taxes on imported diesel fuel by claiming the fuel was a lower grade of industrial and maritime fuel. The untaxed income from the sale of the higher value diesel was laundered through a number of bank accounts and shell companies controlled by the couple, and resulted in an overall $58.677 million tax loss to Romania. Before they could be arrested, the couple fled to Washington state, but eventually were extradited, leaving behind a large piece of property and assets that were sold. The funds from the sale will be returned to the government of Romania. 

(www.justice.gov/opa/pr/12-million-be-returned-romanian-government-victim-international-tax-fraud-and-money, www.justice.gov/opa/pr/12-million-be-returned-romanian-government-victim-international-tax-fraud-and-money)

CPAs, get four hours of fraud CPE with our Fraud Essentials for CPAs WebinarClick here for more information.

Fraud Friday: Paid public restrooms

A German woman who owns a cleaning company that earns revenue from paid public restrooms is on trial for failing to report around €1.2 million. The restrooms have voluntary contribution plates where visitors can leave change, which generated the income that she failed to report. But the case is complicated in that some of the charges date back more than 14 years, the German statute of limitations for tax fraud. Also, some of the restrooms were near the Austrian border and present a jurisdictional problem. And because income from the restrooms is based on voluntary donations, it’s difficult to nail down an exact amount of revenue; even the judge in the case suggested that an amount of €600,000 may be more appropriate than €1.2 million. 

(www.taxbuzz.com/blog/germany-toilet-tax-evasion-trial-begins)

CPAs, get four hours of fraud CPE with our Fraud Essentials for CPAs WebinarClick here for more information.

Fraud Friday: Yoga studio stacking parties

Owners of a NYC yoga studio are facing 30 years in prison for conspiracy and tax evasion for failing to file returns while the yoga studio raked in millions. The chain of studios closed in 2020 following allegations of questionable business practices such as pressuring instructors to work for free. Yoga session fees were donation-based and collected in tissue boxes that were passed around, but instructors were not allowed to count the money collected. Instead, the cash was brought to one studio owner’s home for “stacking parties” where the bills were counted and stacked. The owners spent the funds on personal items such as $270,000 on airfare, $76,000 on hotels, $40,000 on Denver Broncos season tickets, $39,000 at restaurants, and more than $60,000 spent at country clubs and on event tickets. 

(www.nytimes.com/2022/08/24/nyregion/tax-fraud-yoga-to-the-people.html)

CPAs, get four hours of fraud CPE with our Fraud Essentials for CPAs WebinarClick here for more information.

Fraud Friday: Imprecise IQ scores

A Court of Appeals upheld a ruling against a taxpayer for filing false tax returns connected to his wife’s embezzlement of millions of dollars from her employer. The taxpayer argued he thought the funds were his wife’s gambling winnings, which he used to buy a yacht, a snowmobile, and other luxury items. At the appeal trial, the taxpayer argued the district court erred in not allowing evidence of his cognitive deficiencies, consisting of expert testimony and his high school transcript that contained numerous “E” grades. However, the expert could not rule out that the taxpayer’s performance during his cognitive exam was the result of malingering, and the high school transcript contained “an unexplained grading system and imprecise IQ scores.” Based on these and the taxpayer’s own testimony, the court agreed he was aware the couple was spending more than they reported and was found to have not disclosed all income to his accountants. (U.S. v. Mills (July 22, 2022) U.S. Court of Appeals, Third Circuit, Case No. 21-2423)

CPAs, get four hours of fraud CPE with our Fraud Essentials for CPAs WebinarClick here for more information.

Fraud Friday: 76 fraudulent charities

The House Ways and Means Oversight Subcommittee has contacted the IRS looking for answers regarding the streamlined process for applications for tax-exempt status, which allowed one fraudster to have 76 fraudulent charities approved. The fake nonprofits all had names that sounded similar to legitimate nonprofits, such as “American Cancer Society of Michigan.” The actual American Cancer Society had even gotten wind of its fraudulent namesake and contacted the IRS. The IRS is now under fire for not noticing that this particular group of fraudulent charities all used the same Staten Island address. It also highlights the IRS’s own statistics that only one in 2,400 of these streamlined applications gets denied. (www.wealthmanagement.com/philanthropy/irs-hot-water-over-fraudulent-charities)

CPAs, get four hours of fraud CPE with our Fraud Essentials for CPAs WebinarClick here for more information.

Fraud Friday: A vexatious litigant

After being disbarred for bringing numerous unmeritorious litigations and being declared a vexatious litigant (one trial judge wrote in a statement of decision that the taxpayer is “a relentless bully” who displays “terrifying arrogance”), a former attorney found himself in Tax Court regarding disallowed Schedule C expenses. The claimed Schedule C business activities did not generate a profit and mostly stemmed from litigation relating to challenging the taxpayer’s disbarment and lawsuits that would otherwise personally benefit him. He deducted court filing fees, life insurance policy expenses, and various utility expenses, none of which were allowable expenses because the taxpayer failed to show that he engaged in any business activities for the year at issue. (Kinney v. Comm., TCM 2022-81)

CPAs, get four hours of fraud CPE with our Fraud Essentials for CPAs WebinarClick here for more information.

Fraud Friday: A sovereign citizen

A Michigan man is facing felony charges and prison time for bouncing three checks he wrote to pay his taxes. The man, who also claims to be a sovereign citizen, sent the State of Michigan three checks for $1 million each, which bounced because they had routing numbers for TCF Bank. That in and of itself is not a crime, except he did not actually have an account at TCF Bank. Under Michigan law, no-account checks/writing checks on closed account is a class H felony that carries up to 2 years in prison. (www.michigan.gov/ag/news/press-releases/2022/02/10/self-proclaimed-sovereign-citizen-charged-with-writing-fake-checks)

CPAs, get four hours of fraud CPE with our Fraud Essentials for CPAs WebinarClick here for more information.

Fraud Friday: Shakira, Shakira

After being accused by the Spanish government of failing to pay €14 million in tax on income earned between 2012 and 2014, pop star Shakira has rejected a plea deal with Spanish authorities and is moving forward with a trial that she says will prove she has already paid the tax in question and owes no tax debt. For the tax years at issue, Shakira’s official residence was the Bahamas, but she also lived with footballer Gerard Pique in Barcelona. If found guilty, she could face fines and a prison term. (www.euronews.com/2022/07/27/shakira-opts-to-go-to-trial-in-spain-over-alleged-145m-tax-fraud)

CPAs, get four hours of fraud CPE with our Fraud Essentials for CPAs WebinarClick here for more information.

Fraud Friday: Nine professional athletes

A Los Angeles tax preparer has pleaded guilty to engaging in two separate fraud schemes. The first involved filing fraudulent income tax returns for at least nine professional athletes, reporting fabricated business and personal losses. The tax pro and his associates claimed they had specialized knowledge that the athletes’ prior tax professionals lacked and convinced the athletes to amend past returns to generate large fraudulent refunds. They then charged the athletes a fee of 30% of the resulting refund and directed the athletes to send the fee to shell entities. Second, the tax pro and his associates applied for PPP loans on behalf of a number of small businesses, shell entities with few or no employees that they controlled, and business entities controlled by others. They inflated the number of employees and monthly payroll costs claimed on the PPP loan applications and submitted fabricated tax returns in support of the applications. Some of the business owners never saw their loan applications before they were filed. The tax pro charged a fee of 30% of the loan amounts. He’s facing up to 25 years in prison. (https://www.justice.gov/opa/pr/second-defendant-pleads-guilty-multimillion-dollar-tax-fraud-scheme-involving-professional)

CPAs, get four hours of fraud CPE with our Fraud Essentials for CPAs WebinarClick here for more information.

Fraud Friday: Capital with a K

A North Carolina tax preparation business owner has been sentenced to almost four years in prison for a tax fraud scheme that involved hundreds of tax returns and that netted him $700,000. Kapital Financial Services had two locations in Charlotte, and the business owner directed employees to falsify clients’ tax returns, including claiming false deductions, business losses, American Opportunity credits, education credits and earned income tax credits. He also trained his employees on how to create the fraudulent returns to avoid IRS detection and provided them with scripts and cheat sheets. Employees were not allowed to provide clients with copies of their returns, they were only allowed to give clients their refund amount because the fees Kapital charged were taken from the inflated refunds. (https://www.justice.gov/opa/pr/charlotte-tax-preparer-sentenced-prison)

CPAs, get four hours of fraud CPE with our Fraud Essentials for CPAs WebinarClick here for more information.

Fraud Friday: $1 billion in crypto scams

Crypto scams have reached the $1 billion mark for the period between January 2021 and March 2022. Almost 40% of the scams originated on social media. In terms of type of fraud, most scams relate to fake investments that promise large returns, with second place going to “romance scams” that involve gaining trust using a fake online identity and then manipulating funds out of the victim. Most of the scams involve Bitcoin (70%), followed by tether (10%) and Ethereum (9%). (www.forbes.com/sites/rosemariemiller/2022/06/06/bitcoin-leads-crypto-fraud-as-ftc-confirms-1-billion-milestone)

CPAs, get four hours of fraud CPE with our Fraud Essentials for CPAs WebinarClick here for more information.

Fraud Friday: A seized show jumping horse

After busting a tax shelter promoter, the U.S. government seized many of the assets he purchased with the proceeds, including a $750,000 show jumping horse. However, after realizing that it was going to cost at least $50,000 to feed and care for the horse, the government agreed to sell the horse back to the tax shelter promoter’s daughter for $25,000. The daughter had been planning to ride the horse down the aisle on her wedding day. The government has seized horses before; in 2012 they sold 150 horses for $4.8 million, which were seized from a comptroller who had been misappropriating city funds. But maintaining assets before they’re sold can be expensive, as the government has found regarding the maintenance of superyachts seized from Russian oligarchs. (https://finance.yahoo.com/news/horse-seized-tax-fraud-case-133413396.html)

CPAs, get four hours of fraud CPE with our Fraud Essentials for CPAs WebinarClick here for more information.

Fraud Friday: Counterfeit chocolate

A bust of U.S.-themed candy stores on Oxford Street in London raked in £22,000 worth of counterfeit Wonka bars and over £100,000 of counterfeit goods such as vapes, Apple and Samsung products, hookah products, and watches. All counterfeit vapes recovered contained excessive levels of nicotine and had not been approved by the Medicines and Healthcare Products Regulatory Agency. The Food Standard Agency also warned anyone who purchased the counterfeit Wonka bars not to eat them, as there is no way of knowing what ingredients were used or whether food hygiene practices were followed. The stores are being investigated for millions of pounds in tax evasion as well.

CPAs, get four hours of fraud CPE with our Fraud Essentials for CPAs WebinarClick here for more information.

Fraud Friday: That’s a lot of Happy Meals

McDonald’s France has agreed to pay a total of €1.25 billion in fines, penalties, and back taxes to settle a tax evasion case after years of negotiations.  McDonalds France was accused of hiding French profits in lower-tax Luxembourg from 2009 through 2020, and reporting lower profits in France. An investigation was started in 2016 after union officials reported the company for tax evasion. The settlement is made up of a €508 million fine and €737 million in back taxes and is the second-biggest tax settlement in French history. (The largest was the €2.1 billion fine paid by aircraft builder Airbus in 2020.) (https://abcnews.go.com/Business/wireStory/mcdonalds-pay-france-13-billion-tax-fraud-case-85434599)

CPAs, get four hours of fraud CPE with our Fraud Essentials for CPAs WebinarClick here for more information.

Fraud Friday: Go Go Power Ranger

Austin St. John, the actor who played the Red Power Ranger in the 1990s TV show Mighty Morphin’ Power Rangers is facing up to 20 years in prison for participating in COVID-19–related wire fraud. St. John was part of a ring of 18 people who filed for $3.5 million in fraudulent PPP loans for existing or newly created small businesses. This is just the latest in the curse of the Red Power Ranger: in 2017 the actor who portrayed the Red Wild Force Ranger in Power Rangers Wild Force pled guilty to voluntary manslaughter for stabbing his roommate with a sword.

CPAs, get four hours of fraud CPE with our Fraud Essentials for CPAs WebinarClick here for more information.

Fraud Friday: A 70-year-old tax collector

A 70-year-old tax collector in Pennsylvania was sentenced to one year in prison for filing false returns that understated her income. She started underreporting in 2014 and gradually increased the unreported amount each year until her actual income was six times higher than what she reported to the IRS in 2018. She used the funds to buy a mobile home at the Jersey Shore, fund home renovations, and pay for a family vacation to Hawaii. The tax collector and her family argued for her to serve the sentence at home so she could begin paying restitution to the IRS, but the judge was unmoved considering the seriousness of the crime and the fact that she was an elected county tax collector who used her position to not pay her own taxes. (https://www.inquirer.com/news/rosezanna-czwalina-ridley-township-false-income-tax-sentence-20220518.html)

Fraud Friday: Sheep Ministries, Inc

A Tennessee woman is serving 51 months in prison for attempting to cash a fraudulent $1 million bill of exchange from a foreign source. The bill of exchange was flagged because it didn’t have magnetic ink coding like an ordinary check, it contained an “autograph” line instead of a signature line, and wording at the bottom of the document contained the misspelled word “neogotobile.” A private investigator at the bank alerted the police that the bill of exchange was fraudulent. Just prior to the bank fraud incident, she had also filed a fraudulent tax return claiming a $250,000 refund. At trial, it was revealed that in 2006 she had been convicted of multiple counts of filing fraudulent returns using personal information stolen through Sheep Ministries, Inc., the faith-based nonprofit that she ran. (United States v. Marilyn Cook (May 6, 2022) U.S. Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit, Case No. 20-5622)

Fraud Friday: $1 billion cryptocurrency Ponzi scheme

Tax investigators from the J5 (Joint Chiefs of Global Tax Enforcement) have uncovered evidence of a $1 billion cryptocurrency Ponzi scheme. The leads concern transactions around the world, including crypto transactions in the J5 nations: the U.S., the U.K., the Netherlands, Canada, and Australia. Some of the leads involve individuals with significant NFT transactions; NFTs are becoming a new tool in money laundering practices. The IRS is now making tracking cryptocurrency one of its primary priorities, because the lack of regulation and oversight makes cryptocurrency vulnerable to fraud. (https://www.thestreet.com/investing/crypto-ponzi-scheme-irs-regulators)

CPAs, get four hours of fraud CPE with our 2021 Fundamentals of Fraud Prevention & Detection On-Demand WebinarClick here for more information.

Fraud Friday: Daycare center credit cards

Married taxpayers were liable for fraud penalties for failing to report wage and dividend income from the daycare centers they owned and operated. The taxpayers also each had a credit card tied to the corporate bank account, which they used to purchase personal items such as college tuition, vacations, jewelry, and other luxury items. Their adult children also made personal purchases using the corporate credit cards, even though they were not employees of the daycare centers. The daycare center also paid for a Hummer, a BMW, and an Escalade for the taxpayers and their children to drive as their personal vehicles. (Hacker v. Comm., TCM 2022-16)

CPAs, get four hours of fraud CPE with our 2021 Fundamentals of Fraud Prevention & Detection On-Demand WebinarClick here for more information.

Fraud Friday: Consulate conspiracy

A U.S. Consulate officer in Vietnam was charged with conspiracy after participating in a scheme where nonimmigrant visa applicants paid him to approve their visas, netting him over $3 million. He initially kept his payments in a home safe, but as the stash grew, he purchased nine properties in Thailand to attempt to hide the proceeds of the scam. On his tax return for the year at issue, he reported his income from the Consulate Office, but did not report the bribery income. As part of his plea agreement, he agreed to sell the Thailand properties to help pay off the money judgement against him. The properties were sold at a loss, which the taxpayer deducted from his bribery proceeds. But the Tax Court determined that loss deductions are disallowed where the deduction would frustrate federal or state policy. Allowing a deduction for losses arising from the properties obtained through illegal activities would undermine public policy because a portion of the forfeiture would be borne by the Government. (Sestak v. Comm., TCM 2022-41)

CPAs, get four hours of fraud CPE with our 2021 Fundamentals of Fraud Prevention & Detection On-Demand WebinarClick here for more information.

Fraud Friday: Questionable business practices

A real estate developer in Michigan is facing five years in prison plus penalties and restitution for lying to the IRS in an attempt to hide his failure to pay employment taxes he withheld from employee wages. During the investigation, the developer (who is a former CPA) lied to IRS special agents about his companies’ assets income, filed false employment tax returns stating he had no employees, and claimed he could not afford to pay his tax debts. Meanwhile, he was using business accounts to pay for his Lake Michigan vacation home, Lansing condo, car payments, college tuition, personal credit card bills, and his boat. In 2021, he had filed a defamation suit against an East Lansing news outlet for publishing a story on his questionable business practices. The suit was dismissed. (www.justice.gov/Usao-wdmi/pr/2022_0426_Chappelle)

CPAs, get four hours of fraud CPE with our 2021 Fundamentals of Fraud Prevention & Detection On-Demand WebinarClick here for more information.

Putting your child’s name on your home

Dear [CLIENT NAME]:

Many people think it’s a good idea to put their child’s name on the title to their home. Sometimes the parent adds the child’s name to the title and sometimes the parent changes the title to the child’s name. This is generally a very bad idea. Here are five reasons why:

  1. Gift tax return: If you give your child a gift of equity in the home that exceeds $16,000 in value (in 2022), there may be a gift tax to pay and a gift tax return to file.
  2. No gain exclusion: Tax law allows a taxpayer to exclude up to $250,000 of the gain on the sale of a principal residence ($500,000 for a married couple). However, the exclusion is only available if the seller owns and occupies the property for at least two out of the last five years. If the child does not live in the home for that period, the gain on the child’s share of the home is fully taxable.
  3. Equity subject to debts of the child: Property is subject to the debts of its owners. If the child owns the home or is a partial owner, a creditor may file a lien on the property for any of the child’s debts. Although your child may have excellent credit and good fiscal responsibility, your home could be lost if there is an accident or a lawsuit.
  4. You are now a renter: If you give 100% of the property to a child, you are now at the mercy of the child. If the child decides to sell the property, you must move out. There is no guarantee that the child will continue to care for you.
  5. Medicaid problems: Under some circumstances, the gift of the home to the child could be considered a gift for Medicaid purposes. If you give the home to the child and the child subsequently sells it, you could be ineligible for Medicaid benefits in the event of a long-term health crisis.

What should you do instead?

Usually a parent gives the home to the child to make sure that the child easily gets the home at the parent’s death or so the child can manage the affairs of the parent. If this is the case, the parent will be better served by establishing a living trust, along with powers of attorney, so the child can manage the parent’s affairs.

If the reason is to help the child buy his or her first house, a better way is to lend the child money with a low but reasonable interest rate, and set up a program to give annual gifts in the form of principal forgiveness.

If you are considering giving your home to your child, contact me so we can discuss alternatives.

Sincerely,

Your tax professional

Fraud Friday: Philadelphia cheesesteak

In 2020, the 82-year-old owner of a South Philadelphia cheesesteak shop and his son were indicted on tax fraud charges for failing to report more than $8 million between 2006 and 2016. However, there’s so much material to discover in their complex tax case that a Pennsylvania federal court continued discovery until May 2022. The father-son duo are accused of paying wages partially in cash to avoid payroll taxes and filing numerous false returns understating their business income. During a franchising rights dispute, the pair worried their tax fraud scheme would come to light, so they amended several returns to increase reported sales, but then claimed additional fraudulent expenses to offset the income. If they’re convicted, they face five years in prison for conspiracy and for each count of tax evasion, and three years in prison for each false return charge. (https://6abc.com/tony-lukes-tax-fraud-evasion-anthony-lucidonio-sr-nicholas/6332901/)

CPAs, get four hours of fraud CPE with our 2021 Fundamentals of Fraud Prevention & Detection On-Demand WebinarClick here for more information.

Fraud Friday: If preparing (fraudulent) tax returns is wrong…

If preparing (fraudulent) tax returns is wrong, then I don’t want to be right! A Texas tax pro was banned in 2011 from conducting a tax preparation business after she admitted to preparing or assisting to prepare approximately 200 false tax returns. The tax credits she tried to obtain in that case were described in a filing as “so exaggerated that no reasonable person could conclude they were anything but deliberately fabricated.” But she was back at it again, and since 2016, she had been preparing income tax returns for clients despite the prohibition. She prepared numerous false returns which claimed various false items on her clients’ behalf: false wages, salaries, tips, and tax credits such as the Earned Income Credit, Child Tax Credit, and American Opportunity Tax Credit. She has been sentenced to 15 months in prison. (www.justice.gov/usao-sdtx/pr/tax-preparer-sent-prison-tax-fraud-again)

CPAs, get four hours of fraud CPE with our 2021 Fundamentals of Fraud Prevention & Detection On-Demand WebinarClick here for more information.

Fraud Friday: The taxpayer hatched a plan for revenge

After a routine inspection by the Bureau of Alcohol, Firearms, Tobacco, and Explosives (ATF) uncovered violations that resulted in a taxpayer’s business ultimately closing, the taxpayer hatched a plan for revenge. Five years later, he issued W-9s to the two ATF agents, requesting their Social Security numbers. He never received that information, and he then issued a Form 1099-MISC to each of the agents, showing he paid them $250,000 apiece. The agents did not report the income, and the taxpayer deducted $500,000 on the company’s return, flowing the loss through to his individual return. At trial, the taxpayer insisted he had spoken with an IRS agent who said it was acceptable to write off the $500,000. He was sentenced to two years in prison for filing false returns. (U.S. v. Petrunak (May 4, 2017) U.S. Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit, Case No. 16-3631)

CPAs, get four hours of fraud CPE with our 2021 Fundamentals of Fraud Prevention & Detection On-Demand WebinarClick here for more information.

Fraud Friday: Detached and disinterested generosity

A taxpayer successfully argued that $10,500 in checks she received from her boyfriend were gifts, not income. Her boyfriend had reported the payments on a 1099-MISC and deducted them from his income, claiming that he had paid her wages. As a result, the IRS had come looking for income tax since the taxpayer had not reported the income. At trial, the ex-boyfriend changed his story and was evasive in answering questions. The taxpayer, on the other hand, answered every question asked — even those that did not help her case. The court found the taxpayer’s testimony to be forthright and the ex-boyfriends to be untrue, and determined that the $10,500 was paid to the taxpayer with “detached and disinterested generosity,” and held that it was a gift, not reportable income. (Jue-Ya Yang v. Comm., TCS 2008-156)

CPAs, get four hours of fraud CPE with our 2021 Fundamentals of Fraud Prevention & Detection On-Demand WebinarClick here for more information.

Fraud Friday: Stolen identities and fraudulent tax returns

The owner of a Georgia IT business is in prison for almost seven years for using a computer program that he built to store stolen identities and automatically submit fraudulent tax returns using those stolen identities. The program could be accessed remotely, and he hid his IP address whenever he accessed the program, making it difficult for the IRS to trace a tax return back to “one particular origination point.” Refunds were issued on prepaid debit cards and totaled around $600,000. After being indicted, he was out on bond, but was discovered to be threatening potential witnesses against his case and sent back to prison. (www.sacbee.com/news/nation-world/national/article259620689.html)

CPAs, get four hours of fraud CPE with our 2021 Fundamentals of Fraud Prevention & Detection On-Demand WebinarClick here for more information.

Fraud Friday: $3.6 billion in illicit cryptocurrency

IRS Criminal Investigation (IRS-CI) is the only federal law enforcement agency authorized to investigate federal criminal tax violations and related financial crimes: money laundering, corruption, currency violations, and terrorist financing. IRS-CI seized more than $3.5 billion of illicit cryptocurrency in fiscal year 2021, and they’ve already seized more than this amount in fiscal year 2022. So far in 2022, $3.6 billion has been seized by CI agents who tracked unauthorized transactions that sent stolen Bitcoin from a 2016 digital asset exchange hack to digital wallets under the control of the launderers. (FS-2022-18)

CPAs, get four hours of fraud CPE with our 2021 Fundamentals of Fraud Prevention & Detection On-Demand WebinarClick here for more information.

Fraud Friday: Defrauding the California Department of Public Health

A California woman and her five co-conspirators have been charged with defrauding the California Department of Public Health for a scheme that diverted CDPH funds for their private use. The woman was a former manager at CDPH and she billed the agency for “consulting work” that included purchasing a large number of gift cards supposedly as patient incentives, but which she herself used. She and the other fraudsters also billed the state for HIV prevention services that were never provided. Together, the group scammed CDPH out of $2 million; the woman is liable for $750,000 and faces 20 years in prison if charged. (https://fox40.com/news/local-news/former-manager-with-cdph-office-of-aids-charged-in-connection-with-fraud-scheme/)

CPAs, get four hours of fraud CPE with our 2021 Fundamentals of Fraud Prevention & Detection On-Demand WebinarClick here for more information.

Fraud Friday: Software and dementia

In 2020, Robert Brockman was charged with tax evasion, wire fraud, money laundering and other crimes as part of a nearly 20-year scheme to conceal billions in income from the IRS and defraud investors in software company Reynolds & Reynolds, of which he was the CEO. In December 2020, Brockman’s attorneys announced that despite the fact that he was running a multi-billion dollar software company up until November 2020, he was suffering from extreme dementia which prevents him from standing trial. Most recently, he has been accused of continuing to hide assets offshore and transferring property to family members in an attempt to avoid paying his $1.4 billion tax bill. (https://www.autonews.com/dealers/former-reynolds-and-reynolds-ceo-robert-brockman-still-hiding-assets)

CPAs, get four hours of fraud CPE with our 2021 Fundamentals of Fraud Prevention & Detection On-Demand WebinarClick here for more information.

Fraud Friday: Two sisters, five different companies, 16,000 false returns

Two sisters are serving prison sentences for tax evasion and defrauding the government. The sisters created five different companies, some in the names of other people, and filed over 16,000 false returns that netted them almost $25 million in fraudulent refunds. The sisters used the funds to purchase multiple luxury homes and vehicles, before the IRS caught on that one sister had earned over $1 million during one year they were engaged in the fraud, but she had only reported earning around $200,000. In addition to prison time the sisters will pay to the IRS restitution of $24.9 million plus $500,000 for tax evasion. (www.irs.gov/compliance/criminal-investigation/orlando-sisters-sentenced-in-25-million-tax-fraud-scheme)

CPAs, get four hours of fraud CPE with our 2021 Fundamentals of Fraud Prevention & Detection On-Demand WebinarClick here for more information.

Fraud Friday: Dozens of fraudulent and stolen identities

In the first pandemic relief fraud case to go to trial, three San Fernando Valley family members were sentenced to prison for fraudulently obtaining $20 million in PPP loans and EIDL relief funds. The family used dozens of fraudulent and stolen identities – including names belonging to elderly or deceased people and foreign exchange students who briefly visited the U.S. and never returned — to submit fraudulent applications for approximately 150 PPP and EIDL loans. They used the funds to buy homes in Tarzana, Glendale, and Palm Desert, as well as gold coins, diamonds, jewelry, luxury watches, fine imported furnishings, designer handbags, clothing and a Harley-Davidson motorcycle. Two of the sentenced family members are fugitives, having cut their tracking bracelets and going on the run. (https://www.justice.gov/usao-cdca/pr/san-fernando-valley-family-members-sentenced-years-prison-fraudulently-obtaining-tens)

CPAs, get four hours of fraud CPE with our 2021 Fundamentals of Fraud Prevention & Detection On-Demand WebinarClick here for more information.

Fraud Friday: Online auction fraud

A Bulgarian national was sentenced to 10 years and one month in prison for operating an online auction fraud that posted ads on craigslist and eBay for high-cost goods like vehicles that did not actually exist. The buyer’s payment then went through a complex money laundering scheme where someone in the U.S. would receive the payment, convert it to cryptocurrency, and then transfer it to foreign money launderers. The man sentenced had laundered nearly $5 million in cryptocurrency over three years. (https://www.justice.gov/opa/pr/owner-bitcoin-exchange-sentenced-prison-money-laundering)

CPAs, get four hours of fraud CPE with our 2021 Fundamentals of Fraud Prevention & Detection On-Demand WebinarClick here for more information.

Fraud Friday: Renounced U.S. citizenship

The founder of a Russian online bank was required to pay $508 million in tax, interest, and a $100 million fraud penalty for large stock gains following taking his company public on the London Stock Exchange. Three days after the IPO, which netted $1.1 billion, he renounced his U.S. citizenship. He did not report his assets on his expatriation forms, which require expats with a net worth of $2 million or more to report their assets and pay tax; he reported a net worth of $300,000. He also filed a false tax return, leading to his arrest and extradition. Had he paid the tax owed after the IPO ($248,525,339), his bill would have been less than half of what he paid with his plea agreement. (www.justice.gov/opa/pr/founder-russian-bank-pleads-guilty-tax-fraud)

CPAs, get four hours of fraud CPE with our 2021 Fundamentals of Fraud Prevention & Detection On-Demand WebinarClick here for more information.

 

Fraud Friday: $11 million from the Department of Veterans Affairs

A New Mexico couple has been sentenced to prison for embezzling $11 million over a decade from their guardianship and financial services firm. The couple siphoned payments to clients from the Department of Veterans Affairs and Social Security Administration and used the funds to buy RVs, homes, luxury vacations, and to pay over $4 million in AmEx charges. The authorities began an investigation when employees noticed funds were missing from client accounts. The couple fled before their sentencing because they “wanted to get away one last time before they went to prison,” but were located in Oklahoma and arrested, and handed harsher prison sentences. (www.abqjournal.com/2409934/founder-of-guardianship-firms-gets-47-years-in-federal-prison.html)

CPAs, get four hours of fraud CPE with our 2021 Fundamentals of Fraud Prevention & Detection On-Demand WebinarClick here for more information.

Fraud Friday: Chief of the Questionable Refund Unit

The chief of the Questionable Refund Unit for the New Mexico Taxation and Revenue Department was apparently confused about the purpose of his job. Rather than making sure taxpayer returns and refund claims were on the up-and-up, he altered returns and had the resulting fraudulent refunds deposited into his own bank account. In total, he siphoned almost $700,000 from New Mexico’s taxpayers. He’s facing a minimum of 32 years in federal prison on charges of wire fraud, identity theft, and money laundering. (https://www.krqe.com/news/crime/tax-official-pleads-guilty-to-stealing-nearly-700k-in-taxpayer-money/)

CPAs, get four hours of fraud CPE with our 2021 Fundamentals of Fraud Prevention & Detection On-Demand WebinarClick here for more information.

Fraud Friday: Banned for life from acquiring antiquities

An antiquities collector has been banned for life from acquiring antiquities after numerous pieces in his collection were determined to be stolen. An investigation into a statue stolen from Lebanon during the Lebanese Civil War led authorities to the collector, and it was determined that 180 pieces worth $70 million in his possession were stolen or had other evidence of looting. The collector claims he had no idea the items were stolen. The lifetime ban was imposed in lieu of a criminal trial, and the collector has stated that he plans to recoup his losses from the antiquities dealers he was working with. (www.wealthmanagement.com/high-net-worth/billionare-michael-steinhardt-surrenders-70-million-stolen-antiquities)

CPAs, get four hours of fraud CPE with our 2021 Fundamentals of Fraud Prevention & Detection On-Demand WebinarClick here for more information.

Fraud Friday: Attorney in hot water

A French attorney for years had been hounding her client’s stepson, accusing him of stealing her client’s inheritance, which triggered a criminal investigation into his tax reporting of various trusts. The stepson was acquitted of fraud, but the attorney is now in hot water for not reporting the $5 million her client paid her for her efforts. She has been found guilty of aggravated tax fraud and money laundering for her attempt to hide that money, on which she now owes $170,000 in income tax, $135,000 in wealth tax, and $800,000 in fines. (www.artnews.com/art-news/news/claude-dumont-beghi-1234613490/)

CPAs, get four hours of fraud CPE with our 2021 Fundamentals of Fraud Prevention & Detection On-Demand WebinarClick here for more information.

Fraud Friday: $3.5 billion in cryptocurrency

The Cyber Crime Unit of the Internal Revenue Service’s Criminal Investigation Division released a report on its activities, which included seizing $3.5 billion in cryptocurrency in fiscal year 2021 (93% of all of its seizures). The Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act contained provisions expanding the reporting requirements for cryptocurrency, so this will continue to be a focus for the CI division. The report also noted that in 2021, the CI division identified $2.19 billion in tax fraud and another $8.18 billion in other financial crimes. Tax-related issues accounted for 72% of its direct investigative time, with 15.4% spent on non-tax issues such as money laundering and corporate fraud, and 11.2% spent on narcotics crimes. (www.irs.gov/pub/irs-pdf/p3583.pdf)

CPAs, get four hours of fraud CPE with our 2021 Fundamentals of Fraud Prevention & Detection On-Demand WebinarClick here for more information.