2026-21: Tax increases included in budget deal sent to Governor

Today, the California Senate joined the Assembly in passing AB/SB 122 that makes the following changes to California tax law. The Governor is expected to sign the bill.

AB/SB 122 proposes to:

  • Impose sales and use taxes on purchases of digitally delivered prewritten software, which includes software as a service (SaaS; products such as Slack, Zoom, tax software, etc.), effective January 1, 2027;
  • Extend the current $5 million business credit cap (without a percentage-based limit) through the 2029 tax year, and then impose a permanent business credit cap equal to the greater of $5 million or 70% of the total taxes imposed, beginning with the 2030 tax year;
  • Reduce the annual tax imposed on new LLCs, limited partnerships, and limited liability partnerships from $800 to $400, but only for their first year of operation for the 2027 through 2029 tax years; and
  • Impose a 100% tax on any settlement fund payments received by taxpayers during the 2026 through 2029 tax years from any anti-weaponization settlement fund established by the federal Department of Justice.

The NOL suspension currently in effect was not extended as part of the budget deal, meaning that is currently scheduled to expire at the end of 2026.

Sign up for Spidell’s Quarterly Tax Update webinar to stay ahead of the curve and get quarterly updates all year. Click here and register today.

Sign up for Spidell’s Flash E-mail — Get breaking news delivered to your inbox, plus other free analysis and information for tax professionals. Join our community and stay at the top of your game. Click here to sign up.

Tax increases included in budget deal sent to Governor

Today, the California Senate joined the Assembly in passing AB/SB 122 that makes the following changes to California tax law. The Governor is expected to sign the bill.

AB/SB 122 proposes to:

  • Impose sales and use taxes on purchases of digitally delivered prewritten software, which includes software as a service (SaaS; products such as Slack, Zoom, tax software, etc.), effective January 1, 2027;
  • Extend the current $5 million business credit cap (without a percentage-based limit) through the 2029 tax year, and then impose a permanent business credit cap equal to the greater of $5 million or 70% of the total taxes imposed, beginning with the 2030 tax year;
  • Reduce the annual tax imposed on new LLCs, limited partnerships, and limited liability partnerships from $800 to $400, but only for their first year of operation for the 2027 through 2029 tax years; and
  • Impose a 100% tax on any settlement fund payments received by taxpayers during the 2026 through 2029 tax years from any anti-weaponization settlement fund established by the federal Department of Justice.

The NOL suspension currently in effect was not extended as part of the budget deal, meaning that is currently scheduled to expire at the end of 2026.

Sign up for Spidell’s Quarterly Tax Update webinar to stay ahead of the curve and get quarterly updates all year. Click here and register today.

2026-20: Tax professionals may not be able to view FTB client notices

Tax professionals with a POA on file may be receiving alerts from the FTB that inform them that a client notice or other document has been posted. However, some tax professionals may not be able to access the Client Notices page in their MyFTB account.

According to the FTB, although this is a systems issue, it is not impacting all tax professionals. This means some tax professionals can identify which client the notice was sent to, but others are not able to determine this unless they go into each client’s account. Affected practitioners are unable to access the notice or other document unless they know the client’s name and access it through their client’s respective account.

The FTB is working to resolve the issue as quickly as possible.

Tax professionals should not call the FTB Tax Practitioner Hotline for assistance in determining which client was sent the notice, because hotline staff can only access the notice if the tax professional knows the client’s name.

We will work with the FTB to see if the FTB will provide any penalty and/or interest relief if they are unable to resolve this issue quickly.

Sign up for Spidell’s Quarterly Tax Update webinar to stay ahead of the curve and get quarterly updates all year. Click here and register today.

Sign up for Spidell’s Flash E-mail — Get breaking news delivered to your inbox, plus other free analysis and information for tax professionals. Join our community and stay at the top of your game. Click here to sign up.

Tax professionals may not be able to view FTB client notices

Tax professionals with a POA on file may be receiving alerts from the FTB that inform them that a client notice or other document has been posted. However, some tax professionals may not be able to access the Client Notices page in their MyFTB account.

According to the FTB, although this is a systems issue, it is not impacting all tax professionals. This means some tax professionals can identify which client the notice was sent to, but others are not able to determine this unless they go into each client’s account. Affected practitioners are unable to access the notice or other document unless they know the client’s name and access it through their client’s respective account.

The FTB is working to resolve the issue as quickly as possible.

Tax professionals should not call the FTB Tax Practitioner Hotline for assistance in determining which client was sent the notice, because hotline staff can only access the notice if the tax professional knows the client’s name.

We will work with the FTB to see if the FTB will provide any penalty and/or interest relief if they are unable to resolve this issue quickly.

Sign up for Spidell’s Quarterly Tax Update webinar to stay ahead of the curve and get quarterly updates all year. Click here and register today.

2026-19: Increased taxes included in California budget deal

Today, the California Legislature is scheduled to vote on a budget deal that could raise over $1.4 billion in new taxes for the 2026–27 fiscal year. There are two competing versions of the tax proposals included in the budget deal (AB/SB 122 vs. AB/SB 176), and at this stage it is unclear which will pass.

Both proposals would, if enacted:

  • Impose sales and use taxes on purchases of digitally delivered prewritten software, which includes software as a service (SaaS; products such as Slack, Zoom, tax software, etc.), effective January 1, 2027;
  • Reduce the annual tax imposed on new LLCs, limited partnerships, and limited liability partnerships from $800 to $400, but only for their first year of operation for the 2027 through 2029 tax years; and
  • Impose a 100% tax on any settlement fund payments received by taxpayers during the 2026 through 2029 tax years from any anti-weaponization settlement fund established by the federal Department of Justice.

Both bills would also make permanent the $5 million cap on business credits, currently scheduled to expire at the end of the 2026 tax year, but in different forms:

  • AB/SB 176 would enact a new permanent business credit cap equal to the greater of $5 million or 50% of the total taxes imposed, effective beginning with the 2027 tax year; and
  • AB/SB 122 would, in contrast, extend the current $5 million business credit cap (without a percentage-based limit) through the 2029 tax year, and then impose a permanent business credit cap equal to the greater of $5 million or 70% of the total taxes imposed, beginning with the 2030 tax year.

Neither bill would extend the current NOL suspension. This means the NOL suspension continues to be scheduled to expire at the end of the 2026 tax year.

Not included in the budget deal is Governor Newsom’s proposal to conform to the federal tax treatment of Trump accounts. However, this may still be included in subsequent legislation.

Under the California Constitution, the Legislature must pass the budget by midnight tonight.

Sign up for Spidell’s Quarterly Tax Update webinar to stay ahead of the curve and get quarterly updates all year.

Sign up for Spidell’s Flash E-mail — Get breaking news delivered to your inbox, plus other free analysis and information for tax professionals. Join our community and stay at the top of your game. Click here to sign up.

Increased taxes included in California budget deal

Today, the California Legislature is scheduled to vote on a budget deal that could raise over $1.4 billion in new taxes for the 2026–27 fiscal year. There are two competing versions of the tax proposals included in the budget deal (AB/SB 122 vs. AB/SB 176), and at this stage it is unclear which will pass.

Both proposals would, if enacted:

  • Impose sales and use taxes on purchases of digitally delivered prewritten software, which includes software as a service (SaaS; products such as Slack, Zoom, tax software, etc.), effective January 1, 2027;
  • Reduce the annual tax imposed on new LLCs, limited partnerships, and limited liability partnerships from $800 to $400, but only for their first year of operation for the 2027 through 2029 tax years; and
  • Impose a 100% tax on any settlement fund payments received by taxpayers during the 2026 through 2029 tax years from any anti-weaponization settlement fund established by the federal Department of Justice.

Both bills would also make permanent the $5 million cap on business credits, currently scheduled to expire at the end of the 2026 tax year, but in different forms:

  • AB/SB 176 would enact a new permanent business credit cap equal to the greater of $5 million or 50% of the total taxes imposed, effective beginning with the 2027 tax year; and
  • AB/SB 122 would, in contrast, extend the current $5 million business credit cap (without a percentage-based limit) through the 2029 tax year, and then impose a permanent business credit cap equal to the greater of $5 million or 70% of the total taxes imposed, beginning with the 2030 tax year.

Neither bill would extend the current NOL suspension. This means the NOL suspension continues to be scheduled to expire at the end of the 2026 tax year.

Not included in the budget deal is Governor Newsom’s proposal to conform to the federal tax treatment of Trump accounts. However, this may still be included in subsequent legislation.

Under the California Constitution, the Legislature must pass the budget by midnight tonight.

Sign up for Spidell’s Quarterly Tax Update webinar to stay ahead of the curve and get quarterly updates all year. 

2026-18: IRS unveils new Tax Professional Management Office

The Return Preparer Office (RPO) and the Office of Professional Responsibility (OPR) will be operating under a new Tax Professional Management Office, effective June 28, 2026. (E-news for Tax Professionals, Issue No. 2026-23) According to the IRS, this is being done to simplify and modernize how it interacts with the tax professional community.

This reorganization will not change the distinction between credentialed tax professionals and uncredentialed tax preparers. The RPO and OPR will continue to operate independently and the merger will have no impact on how IRS oversees the tax professional community.

The RPO oversees preparer tax identification numbers (PTINs), enrollment programs, IRS approved continuing education providers, and the Annual Filing Season Program for tax return preparers.

The OPR oversees those professionals who practice before the IRS, such as attorneys, CPAs, and Enrolled Agents to ensure they are in compliance with Treasury Department Circular No. 230, Regulations Governing Practice before the IRS.We do not believe that this merger will not impact the Tax Practitioner Hotline because this is currently overseen by the Taxpayer Services Unit.

We will provide additional information concerning this restructuring as it becomes available.

Sign up for Spidell’s 2026 Summer Tax webinar to stay ahead of key developments with clear explanations and actionable takeaways. Click here and register today.

Sign up for Spidell’s Flash E-mail — Get breaking news delivered to your inbox, plus other free analysis and information for tax professionals. Join our community and stay at the top of your game. Click here to sign up.

IRS unveils new Tax Professional Management Office

The Return Preparer Office (RPO) and the Office of Professional Responsibility (OPR) will be operating under a new Tax Professional Management Office, effective June 28, 2026. (E-news for Tax Professionals, Issue No. 2026-23) According to the IRS, this is being done to simplify and modernize how it interacts with the tax professional community.

This reorganization will not change the distinction between credentialed tax professionals and uncredentialed tax preparers. The RPO and OPR will continue to operate independently and the merger will have no impact on how IRS oversees the tax professional community.

The RPO oversees preparer tax identification numbers (PTINs), enrollment programs, IRS approved continuing education providers, and the Annual Filing Season Program for tax return preparers.

The OPR oversees those professionals who practice before the IRS, such as attorneys, CPAs, and Enrolled Agents to ensure they are in compliance with Treasury Department Circular No. 230, Regulations Governing Practice before the IRS.We do not believe that this merger will not impact the Tax Practitioner Hotline because this is currently overseen by the Taxpayer Services Unit.

We will provide additional information concerning this restructuring as it becomes available.

Sign up for Spidell’s 2026 Summer Tax webinar to stay ahead of key developments with clear explanations and actionable takeaways. Click here and register today.

2026-17: Appeals court rules out-of-state sole proprietor not subject to California tax

A Texas radiologist, operating as a sole proprietor, who received revenue from a medical corporation for reading x-rays sent from California medical facilities was not operating a “unitary business” and therefore was not subject to California taxation. (Garcia-Rojas v. FTB(May 1, 2026) Cal. Ct. of App., First App. Dist., Case No. A172054) The court specifically rejected the Office of Tax Appeal’s (OTA) holding in its precedential opinion Appeal of Bindley, 2019-OTA-179P. In Bindley, the OTA held that an out-of-state screenwriter who sold scripts to a California business was operating a “unitary business” and therefore was required to apportion his business income to California under 18 Cal. Code Regs. §17951-4(c).

Note: Out-of-state sole proprietors are not subject to market-based sourcing rules, which only apply to other types of business entities. Rather, sole proprietors are subject to the personal income tax sourcing rules under 18 Cal. Code Regs. §17951-4(c).

The appellate court in Garcia-Rojas held that a sole proprietor that engages in one business activity and receives compensation from one corporation is not a unitary business because the unitary business concept requires that there be two or more businesses. This is true even though the business’s clients are both inside and outside California.

However, the court did note that it “expresses no opinion as to whether the Board [FTB] can tax Garcia-Rojas under a different legal theory.”

Tax professionals with non-California sole proprietor clients, who have paid tax to California based on the FTB’s unitary theory, should consider filing refund claims or protective refund claims for all open tax years based on the court’s ruling.

Sign up for Spidell’s 2026 Post-Tax Season Update and Review webinar to review, refresh, and arm yourself to tackle extensions. Click here and register today.

Sign up for Spidell’s Flash E-mail — Get breaking news delivered to your inbox, plus other free analysis and information for tax professionals. Join our community and stay at the top of your game. Click here to sign up.

Appeals court rules out-of-state sole proprietor not subject to California tax

A Texas radiologist, operating as a sole proprietor, who received revenue from a medical corporation for reading x-rays sent from California medical facilities was not operating a “unitary business” and therefore was not subject to California taxation. (Garcia-Rojas v. FTB(May 1, 2026) Cal. Ct. of App., First App. Dist., Case No. A172054) The court specifically rejected the Office of Tax Appeal’s (OTA) holding in its precedential opinion Appeal of Bindley, 2019-OTA-179P. In Bindley, the OTA held that an out-of-state screenwriter who sold scripts to a California business was operating a “unitary business” and therefore was required to apportion his business income to California under 18 Cal. Code Regs. §17951-4(c).

Note: Out-of-state sole proprietors are not subject to market-based sourcing rules, which only apply to other types of business entities. Rather, sole proprietors are subject to the personal income tax sourcing rules under 18 Cal. Code Regs. §17951-4(c).

The appellate court in Garcia-Rojas held that a sole proprietor that engages in one business activity and receives compensation from one corporation is not a unitary business because the unitary business concept requires that there be two or more businesses. This is true even though the business’s clients are both inside and outside California.

However, the court did note that it “expresses no opinion as to whether the Board [FTB] can tax Garcia-Rojas under a different legal theory.”

Tax professionals with non-California sole proprietor clients, who have paid tax to California based on the FTB’s unitary theory, should consider filing refund claims or protective refund claims for all open tax years based on the court’s ruling.

Sign up for Spidell’s 2026 Post-Tax Season Update and Review webinar to review, refresh, and arm yourself to tackle extensions. Click here and register today.

2026-16: Deductions can now be claimed for medical marijuana expenses

The Department of Justice issued an order on April 22, 2026, immediately rescheduling FDA-approved marijuana products and state-licensed medical marijuana from Schedule I to Schedule III, which means that:

  • The IRC §280E limitations on cannabis businesses no longer apply; and
  • Taxpayers can now claim a medical expense deduction for marijuana.

The order is available at:

www.justice.gov/opa/media/1437441/dl

The order follows President Trump’s December 18, 2025, executive order directing expedited completion of the cannabis rescheduling.

It’s important to note that the DOJ’s order does not legalize recreational use at the federal level, override state laws, or end all restrictions. This order also does not reclassify recreational cannabis as a Schedule III drug, which means the IRC §280E limitations still apply and these items do not qualify for medical expense deductions.

However, the Department is expediting the ongoing rulemaking process to fully remove marijuana from Schedule I and place it into Schedule III and will hold an administrative hearing on this issue beginning June 29, 2026.

In the meantime, we assume that taxpayers will be able to begin claiming medical marijuana business expenses and medical expense deductions as of April 22, 2026, but we await IRS guidance to confirm. We will continue to update you as news develops.

Sign up for Spidell’s 2026 Post-Tax Season Update and Review webinar to review, refresh, and arm yourself to tackle extensions. Click here and register today.

Sign up for Spidell’s Flash E-mail — Get breaking news delivered to your inbox, plus other free analysis and information for tax professionals. Join our community and stay at the top of your game. Click here to sign up.

Deductions can now be claimed for medical marijuana expenses

The Department of Justice issued an order on April 22, 2026, immediately rescheduling FDA-approved marijuana products and state-licensed medical marijuana from Schedule I to Schedule III, which means that:

  • The IRC §280E limitations on cannabis businesses no longer apply; and
  • Taxpayers can now claim a medical expense deduction for marijuana.

The order is available at:

www.justice.gov/opa/media/1437441/dl

The order follows President Trump’s December 18, 2025, executive order directing expedited completion of the cannabis rescheduling.

It’s important to note that the DOJ’s order does not legalize recreational use at the federal level, override state laws, or end all restrictions. This order also does not reclassify recreational cannabis as a Schedule III drug, which means the IRC §280E limitations still apply and these items do not qualify for medical expense deductions.

However, the Department is expediting the ongoing rulemaking process to fully remove marijuana from Schedule I and place it into Schedule III and will hold an administrative hearing on this issue beginning June 29, 2026.

In the meantime, we assume that taxpayers will be able to begin claiming medical marijuana business expenses and medical expense deductions as of April 22, 2026, but we await IRS guidance to confirm. We will continue to update you as news develops.

Sign up for Spidell’s 2026 Post-Tax Season Update and Review webinar to review, refresh, and arm yourself to tackle extensions. Click here and register today.

2026-15: Customs Border Patrol to start processing IEEPA tariff refunds on April 20

On April 20, 2026, importers and brokers can start filing for refunds of the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA) tariffs imposed by the Trump administration and struck down by the U.S. Supreme Court in Learning Resources, Inc. v. Trump (February 20, 2026) U.S. Supreme Court, Case No. 24-1287.

The Customs Border Patrol (CBP) has established a multi-phase process for issuing refunds. During the first phase CBP is accepting claims for unliquidated tariffs (aka nonfinalized) and recently liquidated entries still within the 80-day reliquidation period.

Payees must apply for these refunds electronically by submitting a declaration/application through a new Consolidated Administration and Processing of Entries (CAPE) tab in CBP’s Automated Commercial Environment system. Refunds, along with interest, will be issued electronically within 60–90 days of the CAPE declaration’s acceptance.

Additional information is available on the CBP’s website at:

www.cbp.gov/trade/programs-administration/trade-remedies/ieepa-duty-refunds

Sign up for Spidell’s 2026 Post-Tax Season Update and Review webinar to learn more about these tariff refunds and their tax treatment. Click here and register today.

Sign up for Spidell’s Flash E-mail — Get breaking news delivered to your inbox, plus other free analysis and information for tax professionals. Join our community and stay at the top of your game. Click here to sign up.

Customs Border Patrol to start processing IEEPA tariff refunds on April 20

On April 20, 2026, importers and brokers can start filing for refunds of the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA) tariffs imposed by the Trump administration and struck down by the U.S. Supreme Court in Learning Resources, Inc. v. Trump (February 20, 2026) U.S. Supreme Court, Case No. 24-1287.

The Customs Border Patrol (CBP) has established a multi-phase process for issuing refunds. During the first phase CBP is accepting claims for unliquidated tariffs (aka nonfinalized) and recently liquidated entries still within the 80-day reliquidation period.

Payees must apply for these refunds electronically by submitting a declaration/application through a new Consolidated Administration and Processing of Entries (CAPE) tab in CBP’s Automated Commercial Environment system. Refunds, along with interest, will be issued electronically within 60–90 days of the CAPE declaration’s acceptance.

Additional information is available on the CBP’s website at:

www.cbp.gov/trade/programs-administration/trade-remedies/ieepa-duty-refunds

Sign up for Spidell’s 2026 Post-Tax Season Update and Review webinar to learn more about these tariff refunds and their tax treatment. Click here and register today.

2026-14: Settlement reached in LLC class action

The FTB has finally entered into a class action settlement agreement to refund the $800 minimum franchise tax, penalties, and interest paid by out-of-state passive investors in LLCs doing business in California. (Bahl Media LLC v. FTB, San Francisco Superior Court, Case No. CGC-16-554150) However, the FTB “denies any wrongdoing or liability in connection with any facts or claims” alleged in the case.

The settlement follows years of FTB resistance to refund claims stemming from Swart Enterprises, where the court held that a 0.2% passive interest in a manager-managed California LLC did not constitute “doing business” in California. (Swart Enterprises, Inc. v. FTB (2017) 7 Cal.App.5th 497)

This resulted in the Bahl class action suit. Members on the “class list” prepared during the litigation have previously been notified that they were on the class list, and will automatically receive refunds, unless they opt out.

Members of the class are taxpayers who:

  • Paid the minimum tax and related interest and penalties, if any, to the FTB;
  • Timely field a refund claim of the amounts paid;
  • Either had their refund claimed denied after June 10, 2016, and before July 21, 2023 (the date of class certification), or did not have their claim approved or denied at least six months prior to July 21, 2023;
  • Are not doing business in California because their only connection to California is holding a passive interest in an LLC doing business in California; and
  • Only held a 50% or less interest in an LLC doing business in California.

If you have a client who was not notified, but meets the requirements listed above, see the terms of the settlement agreement for instructions on filing a claim:

www.ftb.ca.gov/tax-pros/law/Preliminarily-approved-bahl-settlement-agreement-w-addendum.pdf

Or see the FTB’s Notice of Proposed Settlement of Class Action:

www.ftb.ca.gov/tax-pros/law/Bahl-media-vs-FTB-notice-of-proposed-settlement.pdf

Sign up for Spidell’s 2026 Post-Tax Season Update and Review webinar to review, refresh, and arm yourself to tackle extensions. Click here and register today.

Sign up for Spidell’s Flash E-mail — Get breaking news delivered to your inbox, plus other free analysis and information for tax professionals. Join our community and stay at the top of your game. Click here to sign up.

 

Settlement reached in LLC class action

The FTB has finally entered into a class action settlement agreement to refund the $800 minimum franchise tax, penalties, and interest paid by out-of-state passive investors in LLCs doing business in California. (Bahl Media LLC v. FTB, San Francisco Superior Court, Case No. CGC-16-554150) However, the FTB “denies any wrongdoing or liability in connection with any facts or claims” alleged in the case.

The settlement follows years of FTB resistance to refund claims stemming from Swart Enterprises, where the court held that a 0.2% passive interest in a manager-managed California LLC did not constitute “doing business” in California. (Swart Enterprises, Inc. v. FTB (2017) 7 Cal.App.5th 497)

This resulted in the Bahl class action suit. Members on the “class list” prepared during the litigation have previously been notified that they were on the class list, and will automatically receive refunds, unless they opt out.

Members of the class are taxpayers who:

  • Paid the minimum tax and related interest and penalties, if any, to the FTB;
  • Timely field a refund claim of the amounts paid;
  • Either had their refund claimed denied after June 10, 2016, and before July 21, 2023 (the date of class certification), or did not have their claim approved or denied at least six months prior to July 21, 2023;
  • Are not doing business in California because their only connection to California is holding a passive interest in an LLC doing business in California; and
  • Only held a 50% or less interest in an LLC doing business in California.

If you have a client who was not notified, but meets the requirements listed above, see the terms of the settlement agreement for instructions on filing a claim:

www.ftb.ca.gov/tax-pros/law/Preliminarily-approved-bahl-settlement-agreement-w-addendum.pdf

Or see the FTB’s Notice of Proposed Settlement of Class Action:

www.ftb.ca.gov/tax-pros/law/Bahl-media-vs-FTB-notice-of-proposed-settlement.pdf

Sign up for Spidell’s 2026 Post-Tax Season Update and Review webinar to review, refresh, and arm yourself to tackle extensions. Click here and register today.

2026-13: Qualified tips deduction final regulation adopted

The IRS has released final Treas. Regs. §1.224-1 that:

  • Defines qualified tips for purposes of the deduction;
  • Provides a complete listing of qualified occupations and their corresponding codes (aka Treasury Tipped Occupations Codes (TTOCs)). These are essentially the same as the original proposed list with the addition of TTOCs for floral designers, visual artists, and gas pump attendants as well as more “illustrative examples” of the 70 or so TTOC categories; and
  • Continues to defer providing guidance regarding the IRC §224 specified service trade or business exclusion, which means that the transitional relief provided in IRS Notice 2025-69 still applies and taxpayers will continue to qualify for the tips deduction even if they or their employer are engaged in an SSTB as defined in IRC §199A.

The final regulations generally retain the IRS’s position outlined in the proposed regulations concerning what is a qualified tip and what is a cash tip (only cash tips continue to qualify, including cash tips paid electronically), with additional clarifications as noted below.

The following are some of the more interesting items included in the final regulation and its accompanying supplementary information:

  • The definition of “cash tips” from the proposed regulations is modified to exclude all digital assets (as defined in IRC §6045(g)(3)(D) and Treas. Regs. §1.6045-1(a)(19)) such as bitcoin, stablecoins, etc. However, tips paid with credit and debit card transactions and through payment apps such as Venmo or Zelle still qualify,  as do tips paid in foreign currency;
  • Additional examples are provided clarifying:
    • Whether a tip is mandatory or voluntary for different types of point of sale (POS) systems and contracts for services; and
    • When payments to digital service providers are treated as compensation or deductible tips, including how digital rewards are treated and the impact of audience engagement mechanisms;
  • The IRS makes clear that the job descriptions included in the TTOC chart are “illustrative” only and are not an “exhaustive list,” which means taxpayers working in certain jobs may still qualify for the deduction even if the job is not specifically listed;
  • The IRS stated that whether the self-employed health insurance deduction, the one-half of self-employment tax deduction, and the self-employed retirement deduction should be deducted for purposes of determining the net income limitation for self-employed taxpayers is beyond the scope of the regulation. Remember that the original version of the Schedule 1-A instructions did not require these items to be deducted for purposes of calculating the net income limitation, whereas the current instructions do; and
  • Taxpayers who are involved in the cannabis industry are engaged in an illegal activity under federal law and are therefore ineligible for the deduction even if they are engaged in an occupation that is otherwise listed in the TTOC chart and cannabis is legal in the state in which they work.

The final regulations maintain the positions that:

  • Self-employed taxpayers can only claim the deduction for tips included on Form 1099; and
  • Partners cannot claim a deduction for tips reported on an information return provided to the partnership.

Sign up for Spidell’s 2026 Post-Tax Season Update and Review webinar for more details on these provisions, and to review, refresh, and arm yourself to tackle extensions. Click here and register today.

Sign up for Spidell’s Flash E-mail — Get breaking news delivered to your inbox, plus other free analysis and information for tax professionals. Join our community and stay at the top of your game. Click here to sign up.

Qualified tips deduction final regulation adopted

The IRS has released final Treas. Regs. §1.224-1 that:

  • Defines qualified tips for purposes of the deduction;
  • Provides a complete listing of qualified occupations and their corresponding codes (aka Treasury Tipped Occupations Codes (TTOCs)). These are essentially the same as the original proposed list with the addition of TTOCs for floral designers, visual artists, and gas pump attendants as well as more “illustrative examples” of the 70 or so TTOC categories; and
  • Continues to defer providing guidance regarding the IRC §224 specified service trade or business exclusion, which means that the transitional relief provided in IRS Notice 2025-69 still applies and taxpayers will continue to qualify for the tips deduction even if they or their employer are engaged in an SSTB as defined in IRC §199A.

The final regulations generally retain the IRS’s position outlined in the proposed regulations concerning what is a qualified tip and what is a cash tip (only cash tips continue to qualify, including cash tips paid electronically), with additional clarifications as noted below.

The following are some of the more interesting items included in the final regulation and its accompanying supplementary information:

  • The definition of “cash tips” from the proposed regulations is modified to exclude all digital assets (as defined in IRC §6045(g)(3)(D) and Treas. Regs. §1.6045-1(a)(19)) such as bitcoin, stablecoins, etc. However, tips paid with credit and debit card transactions and through payment apps such as Venmo or Zelle still qualify,  as do tips paid in foreign currency;
  • Additional examples are provided clarifying:
    • Whether a tip is mandatory or voluntary for different types of point of sale (POS) systems and contracts for services; and
    • When payments to digital service providers are treated as compensation or deductible tips, including how digital rewards are treated and the impact of audience engagement mechanisms;
  • The IRS makes clear that the job descriptions included in the TTOC chart are “illustrative” only and are not an “exhaustive list,” which means taxpayers working in certain jobs may still qualify for the deduction even if the job is not specifically listed;
  • The IRS stated that whether the self-employed health insurance deduction, the one-half of self-employment tax deduction, and the self-employed retirement deduction should be deducted for purposes of determining the net income limitation for self-employed taxpayers is beyond the scope of the regulation. Remember that the original version of the Schedule 1-A instructions did not require these items to be deducted for purposes of calculating the net income limitation, whereas the current instructions do; and
  • Taxpayers who are involved in the cannabis industry are engaged in an illegal activity under federal law and are therefore ineligible for the deduction even if they are engaged in an occupation that is otherwise listed in the TTOC chart and cannabis is legal in the state in which they work.

The final regulations maintain the positions that:

  • Self-employed taxpayers can only claim the deduction for tips included on Form 1099; and
  • Partners cannot claim a deduction for tips reported on an information return provided to the partnership.

Sign up for Spidell’s 2026 Post-Tax Season Update and Review webinar for more details on these provisions, and to review, refresh, and arm yourself to tackle extensions. Click here and register today.

Estimated tax underpayment relief provided to farmers and fishermen

Farmers and fishermen will not be subject to an addition to tax for failure to make an estimated tax payment for 2025 as long as they file a calendar-year 2025 tax return and pay any tax due by April 15, 2026. (IRS Notice 2026-24)

Special estimated tax rules normally apply to qualified farmers and fishermen. Rather than paying four equal estimated tax payments throughout the year, qualified farmers and fishermen (those with two-thirds of their total gross income from farming or fishing) can make one single estimated tax payment on January 15 following the close of their taxable year. No addition to tax is applied if the taxpayer files the return and pays the full amount of tax reported by March 1.

However, many farmers and fishermen were unable to make the March 1 deadline due to difficulties with Form 8995, Qualified Business Income Deduction Simplified Computation, which was not corrected until a February 23, 2026, software update.

The tax relief will be automatically applied if the taxpayer files the return and pays any tax due by April 15, 2026. The IRS will not issue any notices for underpayment of estimated tax. Those farmers and fishermen who already filed and reported an addition to tax can request abatement by filing Form 843, Claim for Refund and Request for Abatement, and following the instructions provided in the notice.

Sign up for Spidell’s 2026 Post-Tax Season Update and Review webinar to review, refresh, and arm yourself to tackle extensions. Click here and register today.

2026-12: Estimated tax underpayment relief provided to farmers and fishermen

Farmers and fishermen will not be subject to an addition to tax for failure to make an estimated tax payment for 2025 as long as they file a calendar-year 2025 tax return and pay any tax due by April 15, 2026. (IRS Notice 2026-24)

Special estimated tax rules normally apply to qualified farmers and fishermen. Rather than paying four equal estimated tax payments throughout the year, qualified farmers and fishermen (those with two-thirds of their total gross income from farming or fishing) can make one single estimated tax payment on January 15 following the close of their taxable year. No addition to tax is applied if the taxpayer files the return and pays the full amount of tax reported by March 1.

However, many farmers and fishermen were unable to make the March 1 deadline due to difficulties with Form 8995, Qualified Business Income Deduction Simplified Computation, which was not corrected until a February 23, 2026, software update.

The tax relief will be automatically applied if the taxpayer files the return and pays any tax due by April 15, 2026. The IRS will not issue any notices for underpayment of estimated tax. Those farmers and fishermen who already filed and reported an addition to tax can request abatement by filing Form 843, Claim for Refund and Request for Abatement, and following the instructions provided in the notice.

Sign up for Spidell’s 2026 Post-Tax Season Update and Review webinar to review, refresh, and arm yourself to tackle extensions. Click here and register today.

Sign up for Spidell’s Flash E-mail — Get breaking news delivered to your inbox, plus other free analysis and information for tax professionals. Join our community and stay at the top of your game. Click here to sign up.

2026-11: Digital asset lot identification relief extended

IRS Notice 2026-20 extends for an additional year, through December 31, 2026, the temporary relief for digital asset lot identification initially provided by IRS Notice 2025-7. During this relief period, eligible taxpayers may bypass the requirement to communicate specific lot selections to their custodial broker.

Under IRS regulations, when a taxpayer fails to make an adequate identification of units sold through a broker, the default rule is that the first-in-first-out method (FIFO) of identification must be used. (Treas. Regs. §1.1012-1(j)(3)(i))

The IRS recognizes that many digital asset brokers do not have systems in place to track a taxpayer’s specific identification of assets sold. For digital assets sold during the 2026 calendar year, taxpayers can make an adequate identification by:

  • Identifying in the taxpayer’s own books and records by reference to any identifier, such as the purchase date and time or the purchase price for the unit sold, that is sufficient to identify the basis and holding period of the digital assets sold; or
  • Recording a standing order on the taxpayer’s own books and records (e.g., an e-mail to their broker), provided that the recorded standing order includes sufficient information to identify any digital asset units sold.

To qualify for relief, the taxpayer must make the identification using either of the methods outlined above prior to the time of sale, disposition, or transfer.

Sign up for Spidell’s 2026 Post-Tax Season Update and Review webinar to review, refresh, and arm yourself to tackle extensions. Click here and register today.

Sign up for Spidell’s Flash E-mail — Get breaking news delivered to your inbox, plus other free analysis and information for tax professionals. Join our community and stay at the top of your game. Click here to sign up.

Digital asset lot identification relief extended

IRS Notice 2026-20 extends for an additional year, through December 31, 2026, the temporary relief for digital asset lot identification initially provided by IRS Notice 2025-7. During this relief period, eligible taxpayers may bypass the requirement to communicate specific lot selections to their custodial broker.

Under IRS regulations, when a taxpayer fails to make an adequate identification of units sold through a broker, the default rule is that the first-in-first-out method (FIFO) of identification must be used. (Treas. Regs. §1.1012-1(j)(3)(i))

The IRS recognizes that many digital asset brokers do not have systems in place to track a taxpayer’s specific identification of assets sold. For digital assets sold during the 2026 calendar year, taxpayers can make an adequate identification by:

  • Identifying in the taxpayer’s own books and records by reference to any identifier, such as the purchase date and time or the purchase price for the unit sold, that is sufficient to identify the basis and holding period of the digital assets sold; or
  • Recording a standing order on the taxpayer’s own books and records (e.g., an e-mail to their broker), provided that the recorded standing order includes sufficient information to identify any digital asset units sold.

To qualify for relief, the taxpayer must make the identification using either of the methods outlined above prior to the time of sale, disposition, or transfer.

Sign up for Spidell’s 2026 Post-Tax Season Update and Review webinar to review, refresh, and arm yourself to tackle extensions. Click here and register today.

Transitional relief announced for business interest elections

Rev. Proc. 2026-17 provides transition guidance for taxpayers who previously elected to be treated as an electing real property trade or business, electing farming business, or excepted regulated utility trade or business, but who now wish to withdraw that election in light of OBBBA amendments. By making these elections, these taxpayers chose to:

  • Not have the business interest expense limitation apply; and
  • Use ADS rather than MACRS for purposes of computing their depreciation deductions and therefore are prohibited from claiming bonus depreciation in the future.

Because OBBBA eased the business interest expense adjusted income limit and allows taxpayers to claim 100% bonus depreciation, many taxpayers who previously elected out of having the business interest expense limitation apply are no longer finding these elections advantageous.

Key provisions of Rev. Proc. 2016-17 allow taxpayers to:

  • Withdraw a prior IRC §163(j)(7) election made for tax years beginning in 2022, 2023, or 2024 by filing an election withdrawal by the earlier of:
    • October 15, 2026; or
    • The statute of limitations period for issuing an assessment for the taxable yar for which the amended return is being filed;
  • Make a late election under IRC §168(k)(7) to opt out of bonus depreciation for any class of property affected by the withdrawn election; and
  • File an amended Form 1065, U.S. Return of Partnership Income, rather than an administrative adjustment request (AAR) to make the above elections.

Sign up for Spidell’s 2026 Post-Tax Season Update and Review webinar to review, refresh, and arm yourself to tackle extensions. Click here and register today.

2026-10: Transitional relief announced for business interest elections

Rev. Proc. 2026-17 provides transition guidance for taxpayers who previously elected to be treated as an electing real property trade or business, electing farming business, or excepted regulated utility trade or business, but who now wish to withdraw that election in light of OBBBA amendments. By making these elections, these taxpayers chose to:

  • Not have the business interest expense limitation apply; and
  • Use ADS rather than MACRS for purposes of computing their depreciation deductions and therefore are prohibited from claiming bonus depreciation in the future.

Because OBBBA eased the business interest expense adjusted income limit and allows taxpayers to claim 100% bonus depreciation, many taxpayers who previously elected out of having the business interest expense limitation apply are no longer finding these elections advantageous.

Key provisions of Rev. Proc. 2016-17 allow taxpayers to:

  • Withdraw a prior IRC §163(j)(7) election made for tax years beginning in 2022, 2023, or 2024 by filing an election withdrawal by the earlier of:
    • October 15, 2026; or
    • The statute of limitations period for issuing an assessment for the taxable yar for which the amended return is being filed;
  • Make a late election under IRC §168(k)(7) to opt out of bonus depreciation for any class of property affected by the withdrawn election; and
  • File an amended Form 1065, U.S. Return of Partnership Income, rather than an administrative adjustment request (AAR) to make the above elections.

Sign up for Spidell’s 2026 Post-Tax Season Update and Review webinar to review, refresh, and arm yourself to tackle extensions. Click here and register today.

Sign up for Spidell’s Flash E-mail — Get breaking news delivered to your inbox, plus other free analysis and information for tax professionals. Join our community and stay at the top of your game. Click here to sign up.

2026-09: Trump account proposed regulations issued

Today the IRS issued proposed regulations under new IRC §§530A and 6434, which govern Trump account pilot program contribution elections. (REG-117002-25, REG-117270-25)

The proposed regulations govern how to open a Trump account and elect the $1,000 pilot contribution for eligible children and generally follow the initial guidance issued in IRS Notice 2025-68. The IRS will be issuing future proposed regulations governing Trump account contributions, investments, distributions, reporting, and coordination with IRA rules.

Here are some of the key points of the proposed regulations:

  • Pilot program elections can be made at any point during the year for an eligible child. This allows an eligible individual (generally the child’s parent) to elect to open a Trump account for their child as soon as the child becomes eligible, instead of waiting until the close of the taxable year;
  • A pilot program contribution can only be made to a Trump account that has been set up for a child. So, for example, even if a child is born in tax years 2025 through 2028 and is eligible to receive a pilot program contribution, no contribution will be made to the child unless a Trump account is set up for the child and an election has been made to receive a pilot program contribution. The election to claim the pilot program contribution must be made by an individual who anticipates that the child will be the individual’s qualifying child for the taxable year in which the election is made; and
  • Only one pilot program contribution can be made per child, but the election can be made at any time during the growth period for a child. For example, a child who is born in 2025 is eligible to have a Trump account opened for them and receive a pilot program contribution. Both the election to open a Trump account and receive a pilot program contribution for the eligible child can be made up to December 31 of the year the child turns age 17.

A child becomes eligible to have a Trump account opened for them as soon as they become a U.S citizen and have a Social Security number. In order to receive a $1,000 pilot program contribution, there is one additional requirement: The child must be born in calendar years 2025 through 2028.

The election can be made by:

  • Filing Form 4547, Trump Account Election(s), either as a stand-alone form or with the return filed by the individual making the election; or
  • Submitting an electronic application at: www.trumpaccounts.gov.

Sign up for Spidell’s 2026 Post-Tax Season Update and Review webinar to review, refresh, and arm yourself to tackle extensions. Click here and register today.

Sign up for Spidell’s Flash E-mail — Get breaking news delivered to your inbox, plus other free analysis and information for tax professionals. Join our community and stay at the top of your game. Click here to sign up.

Trump account proposed regulations issued

Today the IRS issued proposed regulations under new IRC §§530A and 6434, which govern Trump account pilot program contribution elections. (REG-117002-25, REG-117270-25)

The proposed regulations govern how to open a Trump account and elect the $1,000 pilot contribution for eligible children and generally follow the initial guidance issued in IRS Notice 2025-68. The IRS will be issuing future proposed regulations governing Trump account contributions, investments, distributions, reporting, and coordination with IRA rules.

Here are some of the key points of the proposed regulations:

  • Pilot program elections can be made at any point during the year for an eligible child. This allows an eligible individual (generally the child’s parent) to elect to open a Trump account for their child as soon as the child becomes eligible, instead of waiting until the close of the taxable year;
  • A pilot program contribution can only be made to a Trump account that has been set up for a child. So, for example, even if a child is born in tax years 2025 through 2028 and is eligible to receive a pilot program contribution, no contribution will be made to the child unless a Trump account is set up for the child and an election has been made to receive a pilot program contribution. The election to claim the pilot program contribution must be made by an individual who anticipates that the child will be the individual’s qualifying child for the taxable year in which the election is made; and
  • Only one pilot program contribution can be made per child, but the election can be made at any time during the growth period for a child. For example, a child who is born in 2025 is eligible to have a Trump account opened for them and receive a pilot program contribution. Both the election to open a Trump account and receive a pilot program contribution for the eligible child can be made up to December 31 of the year the child turns age 17.

A child becomes eligible to have a Trump account opened for them as soon as they become a U.S citizen and have a Social Security number. In order to receive a $1,000 pilot program contribution, there is one additional requirement: The child must be born in calendar years 2025 through 2028.

The election can be made by:

  • Filing Form 4547, Trump Account Election(s), either as a stand-alone form or with the return filed by the individual making the election; or
  • Submitting an electronic application at: www.trumpaccounts.gov.

Sign up for Spidell’s 2026 Post-Tax Season Update and Review webinar to review, refresh, and arm yourself to tackle extensions. Click here and register today.

2026-08: Qualified tips deduction clarified for self-employed individuals

For purposes of calculating the qualified tips deduction for self-employed individuals, the IRS has adopted a similar approach to the one used to calculate the IRC §199A qualified business income net income limitation for sole proprietors.

Self-employed individuals cannot claim a qualified tips deduction that is greater than the taxpayer’s gross income from the trade or business (including tips), less other deductions allocable to the trade or business.

According to the recently released instructions for Schedule A-1 (contained in the Form 1040 instructions), like the QBI net income limitation calculation, deductions allocable to the trade or business include:

  • The deductible part of self-employment tax;
  • The deduction for contributions to self-employed SEP, SIMPLE, and qualified plans; and
  • The self-employed health insurance deduction.

Sign up for Spidell’s 2026 Post-Tax Season Update and Review webinar to review, refresh, and arm yourself to tackle extensions. Click here and register today.

Sign up for Spidell’s Flash E-mail — Get breaking news delivered to your inbox, plus other free analysis and information for tax professionals. Join our community and stay at the top of your game. Click here to sign up.

Qualified tips deduction clarified for self-employed individuals

For purposes of calculating the qualified tips deduction for self-employed individuals, the IRS has adopted a similar approach to the one used to calculate the IRC §199A qualified business income net income limitation for sole proprietors.

Self-employed individuals cannot claim a qualified tips deduction that is greater than the taxpayer’s gross income from the trade or business (including tips), less other deductions allocable to the trade or business.

According to the recently released instructions for Schedule A-1 (contained in the Form 1040 instructions), like the QBI net income limitation calculation, deductions allocable to the trade or business include:

  • The deductible part of self-employment tax;
  • The deduction for contributions to self-employed SEP, SIMPLE, and qualified plans; and
  • The self-employed health insurance deduction.

Sign up for Spidell’s 2026 Post-Tax Season Update and Review webinar to review, refresh, and arm yourself to tackle extensions. Click here and register today.

2026-07: What to do when California forms are not available through your software provider

We’ve heard from numerous tax professionals who are frustrated because many of the final business entity tax forms are still not available through their tax software provider. This is not a universal issue with all tax software providers, because we have heard from other tax professionals that they have been able to access final forms through their providers. The final FTB forms are also available on the FTB’s website.

When we reached out to the FTB, we were informed that taxpayers can e-file forms with a watermark. A watermark only indicates that the form has not yet been approved for paper filing. However, we recognize that some software products will not allow professionals to print forms that are watermarked, which prevents clients from reviewing their complete tax returns.

The taxing agencies (IRS, FTB, and others) create the forms and set parameters for software developers to recreate the forms and set e-file standards. The reason why one software developer may have a particular form available before another provider is a matter of the software provider managing resources, such as the number of developers and which forms the software company prioritizes.

Sign up for Spidell’s 2026 Post-Tax Season Update and Review webinar to review, refresh, and arm yourself to tackle extensions. Click here and register today.

Sign up for Spidell’s Flash E-mail — Get breaking news delivered to your inbox, plus other free analysis and information for tax professionals. Join our community and stay at the top of your game. Click here to sign up.

What to do when California forms are not available through your software provider

We’ve heard from numerous tax professionals who are frustrated because many of the final business entity tax forms are still not available through their tax software provider. This is not a universal issue with all tax software providers, because we have heard from other tax professionals that they have been able to access final forms through their providers. The final FTB forms are also available on the FTB’s website.

When we reached out to the FTB, we were informed that taxpayers can e-file forms with a watermark. A watermark only indicates that the form has not yet been approved for paper filing. However, we recognize that some software products will not allow professionals to print forms that are watermarked, which prevents clients from reviewing their complete tax returns.

The taxing agencies (IRS, FTB, and others) create the forms and set parameters for software developers to recreate the forms and set e-file standards. The reason why one software developer may have a particular form available before another provider is a matter of the software provider managing resources, such as the number of developers and which forms the software company prioritizes.

Sign up for Spidell’s 2026 Post-Tax Season Update and Review webinar to review, refresh, and arm yourself to tackle extensions. Click here and register today.

2026-06: Guidance issued on OBBBA’s qualified production depreciation deduction

The IRC §168(n) special depreciation deduction for qualified production property allows taxpayers to claim a 100% depreciation allowance for certain real property placed in service after July 4, 2025, and before January 1, 2031. Eligible property must be used in qualified production activity and meet other specified criteria.

New taxpayer-friendly guidance issued by the IRS, which may be relied upon while proposed regulations are promulgated, provides clarity to many unanswered questions regarding this new deduction. (IRS Notice 2026-16)

Highlights of the guidance clarify that:

  • To qualify, the property (or portion of the property) must be an integral part of a qualified production activity, defined as at least 95% of the property’s space is used in the activity;
  • Improvements and additions made to existing property can be treated as qualified production property;
  • Lessors are generally not eligible to claim the deduction, but an exception is available if the lessor and lessee are under common control or members of a consolidated group;
  • Taxpayers can designate on an election the entire unadjusted depreciable basis of eligible property as qualified production property or a designated specific dollar amount (up to the amount of the property’s unadjusted basis); and
  • For the 2025 tax year only, taxpayers can establish that they are engaged in a qualified activity if the principal business activity code that the taxpayer lists on its 2025 federal income tax return is any of the NAICS codes listed under sectors 31, 32, or 33, or under subsectors 111 or 112, that appear in the 2022 North American Industry Classification System (NAICS) Manual (2022).

The guidance provides numerous examples of the concepts listed above, and outlines how a taxpayer makes the election to claim the deduction and when and how the deduction is subject to recapture.

Sign up for Spidell’s 2026 Post-Tax Season Update and Review webinar to review, refresh, and arm yourself to tackle extensions. Click here and register today.

Guidance issued on OBBBA’s qualified production depreciation deduction

The IRC §168(n) special depreciation deduction for qualified production property allows taxpayers to claim a 100% depreciation allowance for certain real property placed in service after July 4, 2025, and before January 1, 2031. Eligible property must be used in qualified production activity and meet other specified criteria.

New taxpayer-friendly guidance issued by the IRS, which may be relied upon while proposed regulations are promulgated, provides clarity to many unanswered questions regarding this new deduction. (IRS Notice 2026-16)

Highlights of the guidance clarify that:

  • To qualify, the property (or portion of the property) must be an integral part of a qualified production activity, defined as at least 95% of the property’s space is used in the activity;
  • Improvements and additions made to existing property can be treated as qualified production property;
  • Lessors are generally not eligible to claim the deduction, but an exception is available if the lessor and lessee are under common control or members of a consolidated group;
  • Taxpayers can designate on an election the entire unadjusted depreciable basis of eligible property as qualified production property or a designated specific dollar amount (up to the amount of the property’s unadjusted basis); and
  • For the 2025 tax year only, taxpayers can establish that they are engaged in a qualified activity if the principal business activity code that the taxpayer lists on its 2025 federal income tax return is any of the NAICS codes listed under sectors 31, 32, or 33, or under subsectors 111 or 112, that appear in the 2022 North American Industry Classification System (NAICS) Manual (2022).

The guidance provides numerous examples of the concepts listed above, and outlines how a taxpayer makes the election to claim the deduction and when and how the deduction is subject to recapture.

Sign up for Spidell’s 2026 Post-Tax Season Update and Review webinar to review, refresh, and arm yourself to tackle extensions. Click here and register today.

2026-05: Mortgage assistance program for disaster victims greatly expanded

The Governor has announced that the state is expanding its CalAssist Mortgage Relief Program to provide up to one year (previously three months) of mortgage assistance grants, up to $100,000 (previously $20,000). The state has also increased the income limits that residents must meet to qualify for the program (e.g., up to $70,000 higher for taxpayers in Los Angeles County).

Residents who previously received three months of assistance will be offered additional support, bringing total assistance to a full year.

To qualify for the grants:

  • The applicant’s primary residence must have been destroyed as a result of a qualified California disaster that occurred between January 1, 2023, and January 8, 2025;
  • The applicant must meet specified income limits;
  • The applicant must only own one residential property; and
  • The property must be an eligible property, which includes a single-family home, condo, or permanently affixed manufactured home.

Applications are free and submitted online. The funds are paid directly to mortgage servicers and never have to be repaid.

Additional information is available at:

www.calhfa.ca.gov/calassist/index.htm

Sign up for Spidell’s 2026 Post-Tax Season Update and Review webinar to review, refresh, and arm yourself to tackle extensions. Click here and register today.

Sign up for Spidell’s Flash E-mail — Get breaking news delivered to your inbox, plus other free analysis and information for tax professionals. Join our community and stay at the top of your game. Click here to sign up.

Mortgage assistance program for disaster victims greatly expanded

The Governor has announced that the state is expanding its CalAssist Mortgage Relief Program to provide up to one year (previously three months) of mortgage assistance grants, up to $100,000 (previously $20,000). The state has also increased the income limits that residents must meet to qualify for the program (e.g., up to $70,000 higher for taxpayers in Los Angeles County).

Residents who previously received three months of assistance will be offered additional support, bringing total assistance to a full year.

To qualify for the grants:

  • The applicant’s primary residence must have been destroyed as a result of a qualified California disaster that occurred between January 1, 2023, and January 8, 2025;
  • The applicant must meet specified income limits;
  • The applicant must only own one residential property; and
  • The property must be an eligible property, which includes a single-family home, condo, or permanently affixed manufactured home.

Applications are free and submitted online. The funds are paid directly to mortgage servicers and never have to be repaid.

Additional information is available at:

www.calhfa.ca.gov/calassist/index.htm

Sign up for Spidell’s 2026 Post-Tax Season Update and Review webinar to review, refresh, and arm yourself to tackle extensions. Click here and register today.

2026-04: 1040-ES mailing address confusion

We have received numerous inquiries from tax professionals alerting us that the Form 1040-ES mailing address for payments had been changed for certain taxpayers in the 2026 instructions. We reached out to the IRS for clarification because no announcement had been made. Since that time, the IRS has removed the 2026 Form 1040-ES from their website.

We’ve been informed by the IRS that taxpayers and tax professionals should use the addresses listed on the following IRS webpages for the appropriate mailing address depending on the state in which the taxpayer is located:

www.irs.gov/filing/where-to-file-paper-tax-returns-with-or-without-a-payment
www.irs.gov/filing/where-to-file-addresses-for-taxpayers-and-tax-professionals-filing-form-1040-es

If payments were made to the wrong address, the IRS will forward the payments to the correct address. However, this is an important reminder that taxpayers should always send payments to the IRS through certified mail. This is also another reason to encourage clients to make payments electronically, to avoid these mailing address concerns.

Sign up for Spidell’s 2026 Post-Tax Season Update and Review webinar to review, refresh, and arm yourself to tackle extensions. Click here and register today.

Sign up for Spidell’s Flash E-mail — Get breaking news delivered to your inbox, plus other free analysis and information for tax professionals. Join our community and stay at the top of your game. Click here to sign up.

 

1040-ES mailing address confusion

We have received numerous inquiries from tax professionals alerting us that the Form 1040-ES mailing address for payments had been changed for certain taxpayers in the 2026 instructions. We reached out to the IRS for clarification because no announcement had been made. Since that time, the IRS has removed the 2026 Form 1040-ES from their website.

We’ve been informed by the IRS that taxpayers and tax professionals should use the addresses listed on the following IRS webpages for the appropriate mailing address depending on the state in which the taxpayer is located:

www.irs.gov/filing/where-to-file-paper-tax-returns-with-or-without-a-payment
www.irs.gov/filing/where-to-file-addresses-for-taxpayers-and-tax-professionals-filing-form-1040-es

If payments were made to the wrong address, the IRS will forward the payments to the correct address. However, this is an important reminder that taxpayers should always send payments to the IRS through certified mail. This is also another reason to encourage clients to make payments electronically, to avoid these mailing address concerns.

Sign up for Spidell’s 2026 Post-Tax Season Update and Review webinar to review, refresh, and arm yourself to tackle extensions. Click here and register today.

2026-03: IRS to remain staffed for first 5 days of shutdown

According to the updated 2026 Lapsed Appropriations Contingency Plan, IRS operations will continue to be fully funded for the first five days of a government shutdown.

The IRS will continue to fund their operations with appropriations remaining from the Inflation Reduction Act. This means there will be little to no impact on IRS operations from the government shutdown for these initial five days as filing season gets underway.

The Contingency Plan also outlines identifies which functions may continue beyond day five. However, if a shutdown is prolonged, disruptions are possible. When the government shut down for 43 days in late 2025, the IRS furloughed almost half of its workforce and paused most operations, including taxpayer call sites.

We will continue to keep you posted as news develops.

Sign up for Spidell’s Quarterly Tax Update webinar to stay ahead of the curve and get quarterly updates all year. Click here and register today.

Sign up for Spidell’s Flash E-mail — Get breaking news delivered to your inbox, plus other free analysis and information for tax professionals. Join our community and stay at the top of your game. Click here to sign up.

IRS to remain staffed for first 5 days of shutdown

According to the updated 2026 Lapsed Appropriations Contingency Plan, IRS operations will continue to be fully funded for the first five days of a government shutdown.

The IRS will continue to fund their operations with appropriations remaining from the Inflation Reduction Act. This means there will be little to no impact on IRS operations from the government shutdown for these initial five days as filing season gets underway.

The Contingency Plan also outlines identifies which functions may continue beyond day five. However, if a shutdown is prolonged, disruptions are possible. When the government shut down for 43 days in late 2025, the IRS furloughed almost half of its workforce and paused most operations, including taxpayer call sites.

We will continue to keep you posted as news develops.

Sign up for Spidell’s Quarterly Tax Update webinar to stay ahead of the curve and get quarterly updates all year. Click here and register today.

FTB’s systems back up and running

The FTB’s network access has been restored and systems are currently back online.

Due to the network outage, the FTB is experiencing a higher volume of calls and is encouraging taxpayers and tax professionals to use MyFTB or online services to address their issues if possible.

Sign up for Spidell’s 2026 Post-Tax Season Update and Review webinar to review, refresh, and arm yourself to tackle extensions. Click here and register today.

2026-02: FTB’s systems back up and running

The FTB’s network access has been restored and systems are currently back online.

Due to the network outage, the FTB is experiencing a higher volume of calls and is encouraging taxpayers and tax professionals to use MyFTB or online services to address their issues if possible.

Sign up for Spidell’s 2026 Post-Tax Season Update and Review webinar to review, refresh, and arm yourself to tackle extensions. Click here and register today.

Sign up for Spidell’s Flash E-mail — Get breaking news delivered to your inbox, plus other free analysis and information for tax professionals. Join our community and stay at the top of your game. Click here to sign up.

FTB’s systems are down

The FTB has notified Spidell that their systems are currently down. They have stated that this does not appear to be a security-related issue.

However, FTB staff will not be able to assist taxpayers or tax professionals while their systems are down because they will be unable to access taxpayer information.

We will send another Flash E-mail when their systems are back up.

Sign up for Spidell’s 2026 Post-Tax Season Update and Review webinar to review, refresh, and arm yourself to tackle extensions. Click here and register today.

2026-01: FTB’s systems are down

The FTB has notified Spidell that their systems are currently down. They have stated that this does not appear to be a security-related issue.

However, FTB staff will not be able to assist taxpayers or tax professionals while their systems are down because they will be unable to access taxpayer information.

We will send another Flash E-mail when their systems are back up.

Sign up for Spidell’s 2026 Post-Tax Season Update and Review webinar to review, refresh, and arm yourself to tackle extensions. Click here and register today.

Sign up for Spidell’s Flash E-mail — Get breaking news delivered to your inbox, plus other free analysis and information for tax professionals. Join our community and stay at the top of your game. Click here to sign up.

 

2025-83: Ladies and gentlemen, start your engines! IRS announces tax season opening date

The IRS has announced that Monday, January 26, 2026, is the opening day of the 2026 income tax filing season. This is the date when the IRS officially begins accepting and processing 2025 federal income tax returns. The California Franchise Tax Board is already accepting e-filed returns.

Tax returns filed early in the filing season are generally processed faster, so filing easier returns as early as possible will help keep the filing season as smooth as possible. However, just because filing season opens on January 26 does not mean that all forms and schedules will be available by that date. Be sure to check with your software provider for release dates for any forms that are not available.

With the passage of the One Big, Beautiful Bill Act (OBBBA), the 2026 filing season contains many changes from last year. Be sure to attend Spidell’s Federal and California Tax Update webinar for a complete rundown of all the changes you need to know, including:

  • The IRS’s phaseout of paper refund checks (but not payments … yet);
  • How to open Trump accounts and elect federal government seed money for newborns;
  • OBBBA’s new tax provisions as well as those provisions that were extended by OBBBA;
  • Form updates; and
  • Many more changes that occurred in 2025.

Sign up for Spidell’s 2025/2026 Federal and California Tax Update webinar and get information on the most important issues facing your practice. Click here and register today.

Sign up for Spidell’s Flash E-mail — Get breaking news delivered to your inbox, plus other free analysis and information for tax professionals. Join our community and stay at the top of your game. Click here to sign up.

Ladies and gentlemen, start your engines! IRS announces tax season opening date

The IRS has announced that Monday, January 26, 2026, is the opening day of the 2026 income tax filing season. This is the date when the IRS officially begins accepting and processing 2025 federal income tax returns. The California Franchise Tax Board is already accepting e-filed returns.

Tax returns filed early in the filing season are generally processed faster, so filing easier returns as early as possible will help keep the filing season as smooth as possible. However, just because filing season opens on January 26 does not mean that all forms and schedules will be available by that date. Be sure to check with your software provider for release dates for any forms that are not available.

With the passage of the One Big, Beautiful Bill Act (OBBBA), the 2026 filing season contains many changes from last year. Be sure to attend Spidell’s Federal and California Tax Update webinar for a complete rundown of all the changes you need to know, including:

  • The IRS’s phaseout of paper refund checks (but not payments … yet);
  • How to open Trump accounts and elect federal government seed money for newborns;
  • OBBBA’s new tax provisions as well as those provisions that were extended by OBBBA;
  • Form updates; and
  • Many more changes that occurred in 2025.

Sign up for Spidell’s 2025/2026 Federal and California Tax Update webinar and get information on the most important issues facing your practice. Click here and register today.

2025-82: More disaster tax relief legislation enacted

President Trump has signed the Disaster Related Extension of Deadlines Act (HR 1491), which makes two key changes for disaster victims. The act:

  • Extends the statute of limitations period for disaster victims to file a refund claim; and
  • Prohibits the IRS from mailing a payment due notice to disaster victims until 60 days after the disaster postponement period.

Federal law allows taxpayers to file a refund claim within three years from the time the taxpayer’s return was filed or two years from the time the tax was paid, whichever expires later. However, the amount that may be refunded is limited to the amount of tax paid within the statutory lookback period. The lookback period for taxpayers who file a refund claim within three years of filing the taxpayer’s return is equal to three years plus the period of any extension of time for claiming the return. Otherwise, the lookback period is two years.

Under prior law, disaster postponements were not treated as an “extension,” so even though taxpayers were granted postponements to pay the tax, the lookback period was not extended to include the disaster postponement period. This frequently resulted in taxpayers being unable to claim excess withholding or estimated tax payments which were deemed paid as of the original due date, without regard to the postponement period.

Sign up for Spidell’s 2025/2026 Federal and California Tax Update webinar and get information on the most important issues facing your practice. Click here and register today.

Sign up for Spidell’s Flash E-mail — Get breaking news delivered to your inbox, plus other free analysis and information for tax professionals. Join our community and stay at the top of your game. Click here to sign up.

More disaster tax relief legislation enacted

President Trump has signed the Disaster Related Extension of Deadlines Act (HR 1491), which makes two key changes for disaster victims. The act:

  • Extends the statute of limitations period for disaster victims to file a refund claim; and
  • Prohibits the IRS from mailing a payment due notice to disaster victims until 60 days after the disaster postponement period.

Federal law allows taxpayers to file a refund claim within three years from the time the taxpayer’s return was filed or two years from the time the tax was paid, whichever expires later. However, the amount that may be refunded is limited to the amount of tax paid within the statutory lookback period. The lookback period for taxpayers who file a refund claim within three years of filing the taxpayer’s return is equal to three years plus the period of any extension of time for claiming the return. Otherwise, the lookback period is two years.

Under prior law, disaster postponements were not treated as an “extension,” so even though taxpayers were granted postponements to pay the tax, the lookback period was not extended to include the disaster postponement period. This frequently resulted in taxpayers being unable to claim excess withholding or estimated tax payments which were deemed paid as of the original due date, without regard to the postponement period.

Sign up for Spidell’s 2025/2026 Federal and California Tax Update webinar and get information on the most important issues facing your practice. Click here and register today.

2025-81: Passenger vehicle loan interest deduction guidance released

Proposed regulations clarify the eligibility requirements for the new IRC §163(h)(4) deduction for interest paid on qualified passenger loan vehicles purchased for personal use that is available for the 2025 through 2028 tax years. (REG-113515-25) The deduction is capped at $10,000 annually and is subject to phaseout for taxpayers with modified AGI above $150,000 ($250,000 MFJ). One of the requirements for the deduction is that the original use of the vehicle must commence with the taxpayer.

Highlights of the proposed regulations clarify that:

  • Only an individual, decedent’s estate, nongrantor trust, or disregarded entity (e.g., nongrantor trust or SMLLC) owned by one of these taxpayers can claim the deduction (assuming the other requirements are met);
  • The personal use requirement is met if at the time of purchase the taxpayer estimates that the vehicle will be used more than 50% of the time for personal use. Taxpayers do not have to reevaluate the personal use requirement in subsequent years. For disregarded entities the determination is made at the owner level, and for estates and trusts this is determined based on the expected use by the heirs or beneficiaries;
  • A taxpayer that uses a vehicle partially for business use can choose to deduct the interest as a business expense, but must reduce the auto loan interest deduction claimed on Schedule 1-A by the amount of business interest claimed;
  • The $10,000 limit applies per return, so MFJ filers are limited to a $10,000 deduction, while taxpayers who file MFS would be entitled to up to $10,000 per spouse;
  • Interest attributable to amounts directly related to the purchase of the vehicle (e.g., vehicle service plans, extended warranties, sales taxes, and vehicle-related fees) qualifies for the deduction; and
  • Although interest paid on refinanced loans qualifies for the deduction, the deduction is limited to interest paid on the outstanding balance of the refinanced loan as of the date of the refinancing.

The proposed regulations also outline the reporting requirements for lenders, but lenders were given transitional relief for the 2025 tax year. (IRS Notice 2025-57) See our October 21, 2025, Flash E-mail for details.

Sign up for Spidell’s 2025/2026 Federal and California Tax Update webinar and get information on the most important issues facing your practice. Click here and register today.

Passenger vehicle loan interest deduction guidance released

Proposed regulations clarify the eligibility requirements for the new IRC §163(h)(4) deduction for interest paid on qualified passenger loan vehicles purchased for personal use that is available for the 2025 through 2028 tax years. (REG-113515-25) The deduction is capped at $10,000 annually and is subject to phaseout for taxpayers with modified AGI above $150,000 ($250,000 MFJ). One of the requirements for the deduction is that the original use of the vehicle must commence with the taxpayer.

Highlights of the proposed regulations clarify that:

  • Only an individual, decedent’s estate, nongrantor trust, or disregarded entity (e.g., nongrantor trust or SMLLC) owned by one of these taxpayers can claim the deduction (assuming the other requirements are met);
  • The personal use requirement is met if at the time of purchase the taxpayer estimates that the vehicle will be used more than 50% of the time for personal use. Taxpayers do not have to reevaluate the personal use requirement in subsequent years. For disregarded entities the determination is made at the owner level, and for estates and trusts this is determined based on the expected use by the heirs or beneficiaries;
  • A taxpayer that uses a vehicle partially for business use can choose to deduct the interest as a business expense, but must reduce the auto loan interest deduction claimed on Schedule 1-A by the amount of business interest claimed;
  • The $10,000 limit applies per return, so MFJ filers are limited to a $10,000 deduction, while taxpayers who file MFS would be entitled to up to $10,000 per spouse;
  • Interest attributable to amounts directly related to the purchase of the vehicle (e.g., vehicle service plans, extended warranties, sales taxes, and vehicle-related fees) qualifies for the deduction; and
  • Although interest paid on refinanced loans qualifies for the deduction, the deduction is limited to interest paid on the outstanding balance of the refinanced loan as of the date of the refinancing.

The proposed regulations also outline the reporting requirements for lenders, but lenders were given transitional relief for the 2025 tax year. (IRS Notice 2025-57) See our October 21, 2025, Flash E-mail for details.

Sign up for Spidell’s 2025/2026 Federal and California Tax Update webinar and get information on the most important issues facing your practice. Click here and register today.

2025-80: IRS releases 2026 optional standard mileage rates

Beginning January 1, 2026, the standard mileage rates for the use of a car, van, pickup truck, or panel truck are:

  • 72.5 cents per mile driven for business use, up 2.5 cents from 2025;
  • 20.5 cents per mile driven for medical purposes, down 0.5 cents from 2025;
  • 20.5 cents per mile for moving purposes for qualified active-duty members of the Armed Forces and intelligence community, down 0.5 cents from 2025; and
  • 14 cents per mile driven in service of charitable organizations, unchanged from 2025.
    (IRS Notice 2026-10)

The rates apply to fully electric and hybrid vehicles, as well as gasoline and diesel-powered vehicles.

Sign up for Spidell’s 2025/2026 Federal and California Tax Update webinar and get information on the most important issues facing your practice. Click here and register today.

Sign up for Spidell’s Flash E-mail — Get breaking news delivered to your inbox, plus other free analysis and information for tax professionals. Join our community and stay at the top of your game. Click here to sign up.

IRS releases 2026 optional standard mileage rates

Beginning January 1, 2026, the standard mileage rates for the use of a car, van, pickup truck, or panel truck are:

  • 72.5 cents per mile driven for business use, up 2.5 cents from 2025;
  • 20.5 cents per mile driven for medical purposes, down 0.5 cents from 2025;
  • 20.5 cents per mile for moving purposes for qualified active-duty members of the Armed Forces and intelligence community, down 0.5 cents from 2025; and
  • 14 cents per mile driven in service of charitable organizations, unchanged from 2025.
    (IRS Notice 2026-10)

The rates apply to fully electric and hybrid vehicles, as well as gasoline and diesel-powered vehicles.

Sign up for Spidell’s 2025/2026 Federal and California Tax Update webinar and get information on the most important issues facing your practice. Click here and register today.

2025-79: Executive Order reclassifies cannabis as Schedule III drug

President Trump issued an Executive Order directing the Attorney General to take all necessary steps to complete the rulemaking process related to rescheduling cannabis from a Schedule I drug to a Schedule III drug under the Controlled Substances Act (CSA).

Rescheduling cannabis as a Schedule III drug is significant for taxpayers involved in the cannabis industry because under IRC §280E businesses trafficking in Schedule I or II drugs under the CSA cannot claim any business-related deductions or credits, except cost of goods sold.

It’s important to recognize that the Executive Order does not, in and of itself, reclassify cannabis as a Schedule III drug. The Attorney General’s office must issue regulations to complete the reclassification process, which likely wouldn’t happen until sometime during the 2026 calendar year.

Despite reclassification as a Schedule III drug, cannabis would remain illegal at the federal level, so it’s unlikely that the reclassification would open up more banking opportunities to cannabis businesses.

Sign up for Spidell’s 2025/2026 Federal and California Tax Update webinar and get information on the most important issues facing your practice. Click here and register today.

Sign up for Spidell’s Flash E-mail — Get breaking news delivered to your inbox, plus other free analysis and information for tax professionals. Join our community and stay at the top of your game. Click here to sign up.

Executive Order reclassifies cannabis as Schedule III drug

President Trump issued an Executive Order directing the Attorney General to take all necessary steps to complete the rulemaking process related to rescheduling cannabis from a Schedule I drug to a Schedule III drug under the Controlled Substances Act (CSA).

Rescheduling cannabis as a Schedule III drug is significant for taxpayers involved in the cannabis industry because under IRC §280E businesses trafficking in Schedule I or II drugs under the CSA cannot claim any business-related deductions or credits, except cost of goods sold.

It’s important to recognize that the Executive Order does not, in and of itself, reclassify cannabis as a Schedule III drug. The Attorney General’s office must issue regulations to complete the reclassification process, which likely wouldn’t happen until sometime during the 2026 calendar year.

Despite reclassification as a Schedule III drug, cannabis would remain illegal at the federal level, so it’s unlikely that the reclassification would open up more banking opportunities to cannabis businesses.

Sign up for Spidell’s 2025/2026 Federal and California Tax Update webinar and get information on the most important issues facing your practice. Click here and register today.

2025-8: BOI reporting remains “voluntary” for time being

According to an alert posted on FinCEN’s beneficial ownership information (BOI) reporting webpage, BOI reporting is still voluntary for now despite the U.S. Supreme Court’s stay of the preliminary injunction issued by a federal district court in Texas Top Cop Shop Inc. v. McHenry. ((January 23, 2025) U.S. Supreme Court, Case No. 24A653)

This is because another judge in a separate case has also issued a nationwide injunction against the BOI reporting requirements. (Smith v. U.S. Department of Treasury (January 7, 2025) U.S. Dist. Court, Eastern Dist. of Texas, Case No. 6:24-CV-336)) To date, the Department of Justice has not filed an appeal in Smith. It is not known whether the new administration will appeal the case.

This means that, for now, businesses are not required to file BOI reports and cannot be penalized for failing to do so.

It is also important to note that two bills (HR 425 and S 100) have been introduced in Congress to repeal the Corporate Transparency Act, which created the BOI reporting mandate.

We will keep you apprised of any further developments as they occur.


Sign up for Spidell’s 2024/25 Federal and California Tax Update and stay on top of late-breaking news. Click here for details.

Sign up for Spidell’s Flash E-mail — Get breaking news delivered to your inbox, plus other free analysis and information for tax professionals. Join our community and stay at the top of your game. Click here to sign up.

Posted in Uncategorized

BOI reporting remains “voluntary” for time being

According to an alert posted on FinCEN’s beneficial ownership information (BOI) reporting webpage, BOI reporting is still voluntary for now despite the U.S. Supreme Court’s stay of the preliminary injunction issued by a federal district court in Texas Top Cop Shop Inc. v. McHenry. ((January 23, 2025) U.S. Supreme Court, Case No. 24A653)

This is because another judge in a separate case has also issued a nationwide injunction against the BOI reporting requirements. (Smith v. U.S. Department of Treasury (January 7, 2025) U.S. Dist. Court, Eastern Dist. of Texas, Case No. 6:24-CV-336)) To date, the Department of Justice has not filed an appeal in Smith. It is not known whether the new administration will appeal the case.

This means that, for now, businesses are not required to file BOI reports and cannot be penalized for failing to do so.

It is also important to note that two bills (HR 425 and S 100) have been introduced in Congress to repeal the Corporate Transparency Act, which created the BOI reporting mandate.

We will keep you apprised of any further developments as they occur.


Sign up for Spidell’s 2024/25 Federal and California Tax Update and stay on top of late-breaking news. Click here for details.

Posted in Uncategorized

2025-7: U.S. Supreme Court lifts BOI mandate injunction

Today, the U.S. Supreme Court stayed the order from the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals that reinstated the lower court’s nationwide injunction against the beneficial ownership information (BOI) reporting requirement. (McHenry v. Texas Top Cop Shop, Inc. (January 23, 2025) U.S. Supreme Court, Case No. 24A653)

FinCEN has yet to issue any additional guidance after the U.S. Supreme Court’s ruling, so it is unclear at this point whether businesses will be required to comply with the BOI reporting mandate. We anticipate we will hear more from FinCEN and/or Congress shortly and will keep you apprised of any further developments.


Sign up for Spidell’s 2024/25 Federal and California Tax Update and stay on top of late-breaking news. Click here for details.

Sign up for Spidell’s Flash E-mail — Get breaking news delivered to your inbox, plus other free analysis and information for tax professionals. Join our community and stay at the top of your game. Click here to sign up.

Posted in Uncategorized

U.S. Supreme Court lifts BOI mandate injunction

Today, the U.S. Supreme Court stayed the order from the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals that reinstated the lower court’s nationwide injunction against the beneficial ownership information (BOI) reporting requirement. (McHenry v. Texas Top Cop Shop, Inc. (January 23, 2025) U.S. Supreme Court, Case No. 24A653)

FinCEN has yet to issue any additional guidance after the U.S. Supreme Court’s ruling, so it is unclear at this point whether businesses will be required to comply with the BOI reporting mandate. We anticipate we will hear more from FinCEN and/or Congress shortly and will keep you apprised of any further developments.


Sign up for Spidell’s 2024/25 Federal and California Tax Update and stay on top of late-breaking news. Click here for details.

Posted in Uncategorized

2024-59: Senate sends disaster relief and wildfire settlement exclusion bill to President

The Senate has passed the Federal Disaster Tax Relief Act of 2023 (H.R. 5863).

If enacted, the bill would:

  • Exclude from gross income qualified wildfire relief payments paid to individuals as compensation (other than insurance payments) for losses, expenses, or damages for any wildfire declared a federal disaster after December 31, 2014 (§3, H.R. 5863);
  • Treat disaster relief payments to victims of the East Palestine, Ohio, train derailment as excludable IRC §139(b) payments (§3, H.R. 5863); and
  • Allow individual victims with a net disaster loss from any taxable year to claim an enhanced personal casualty loss under IRC §165(h) for certain federally declared disasters that occurred after February 24, 2021. (§2, H.R. 5863)

The bill previously passed the House and will now be sent to the President. It is expected that President Biden will sign the bill.

The text of the bill is available at:

www.congress.gov/bill/118th-congress/house-bill/5863/text


Sign up for Spidell’s 2024/25 Federal and California Tax Update and stay on top of late-breaking news. Click here for details.

Sign up for Spidell’s Flash E-mail — Get breaking news delivered to your inbox, plus other free analysis and information for tax professionals. Join our community and stay at the top of your game. Click here to sign up.

Posted in Uncategorized

2024-58: Court puts BOI reporting on hold for all businesses

A federal district court in Texas issued a nationwide preliminary injunction against enforcing the beneficial ownership reporting requirements mandated by the Corporate Transparency Act (CTA). (Texas Top Cop Shop v. Garland (December 3, 2024) U.S. Dist. Ct., Eastern Dist. of Texas, Case No. 4:24-CV-478)

The court ruled that Congress exceeded its authority in enacting the CTA, resulting in an unconstitutional infringement on states’ rights to regulate businesses. The court granted a nationwide injunction prohibiting FinCEN from enforcing the January 1, 2025, reporting deadline for all reporting companies.

The opinion was issued on December 3, 2024, and will likely be appealed. However, for now, businesses do not have to file beneficial ownership information reports with FinCEN.

We will continue to update you as news develops on this issue.

The opinion is available at:

www.spidell.com/files/2024/ttcsvgarland.pdf


Sign up for Spidell’s 2024/25 Federal and California Tax Update and stay on top of late-breaking news. Click here for details.

Sign up for Spidell’s Flash E-mail — Get breaking news delivered to your inbox, plus other free analysis and information for tax professionals. Join our community and stay at the top of your game. Click here to sign up.

Posted in Uncategorized

Fraud Friday: Garbage to gold

Lucent Polymers, Inc. discovered a way to turn “garbage to gold” by using recycled and scrap materials to create high-quality plastics that were flame-resistant and extremely strong. Unfortunately, the business model was a total sham. The flame-resistant products routinely caught fire and impact-resistant materials were too brittle and shattered. But the company’s founders hid this from potential buyers by providing them with falsified lab tests that shows the products performed as claimed. After the company sold twice in quick succession, the SEC caught wind and the founders have been convicted of securities fraud and money laundering.

(https://resource-recycling.com/plastics/2021/03/31/lucent-execs-sentenced-for-federal-crimes/)

CPAs, get four hours of fraud CPE with our Fraud Essentials for CPAs WebinarClick here for more information.

Fraud Friday: Fancy colored diamonds

The founder of Argyle Coin, a virtual currency that was allegedly backed by “fancy colored diamonds” received a seven-year sentence and will pay $23 million in restitution for defrauding investors. Argyle Coin, LLC was created when the founder’s prior diamond-selling scam had started to unravel, and he used money from investors in his new “high return, no risk” digital currency to pay off existing investors. He also managed to siphon away $10 million for himself to spend on a house, shopping at Gucci, purchasing horses, and riding lessons for his adult son.

(https://coingeek.com/argyle-coin-founder-involved-in-25m-scam-gets-7-years-in-jail/)

CPAs, get four hours of fraud CPE with our Fraud Essentials for CPAs WebinarClick here for more information.

Fraud Friday: 300 B.C.

One of the earliest recorded instances of fraud took place in 300 B.C. Two Greek merchants, Hegestratos and Zenosthemis, took out an insurance policy and borrowed money on a cargo ship that was allegedly going to be filled with corn, but their plan was to sink the boat, keep the money, and sell the corn elsewhere. As Hegestratos was attempting to chop a hole in the hull of the boat with an axe, one of the crew members discovered him. Hegestratos attempted to escape by jumping off the boat and trying to swim to shore, but he drown at sea; Zenosthemis was tried in an Athenian court.

(www.investopedia.com/articles/financial-theory/09/history-of-fraud.asp)

CPAs, get four hours of fraud CPE with our Fraud Essentials for CPAs WebinarClick here for more information.

Fraud Friday: Celebrity attorney Michael Avenatti

Celebrity attorney Michael Avenatti was sentenced to 168 months in prison for wire fraud and endeavoring to obstruct the administration of the Internal Revenue Code. He was also ordered to pay $10 million in restitution to four clients and the IRS. Avenatti received funds for his clients and placed them into client trust accounts, but then misappropriated the funds to finance an extravagant lifestyle. He then lied to clients about the terms of their settlement or whether he had received their funds. In one case, Avenatti drained a client’s trust account to fund his own coffee business; in another case, he used the bulk of a client’s settlement to purchase a private jet. Regarding the obstruction charge, Avenatti lied to IRS agents, and changed his company’s name, EIN, and bank information to avoid IRS levies.

(www.justice.gov/usao-cdca/pr/lawyer-michael-avenatti-sentenced-14-years-federal-prison-stealing-millions-dollars)

CPAs, get four hours of fraud CPE with our Fraud Essentials for CPAs WebinarClick here for more information.

Fraud Friday: CAR-HIT-U

A Detroit-area personal injury attorney known for his 855-CAR-HIT-U billboards has been convicted for tax fraud for failing to report over $2.6 million in income. He concealed the funds by placing them in undisclosed Interest on Lawyer’s Trust Accounts, which are used to hold funds on behalf of clients. He failed to disclose these accounts to the Michigan State Bar Foundation and his tax return preparer. He’s facing prison time plus penalties for each count.

(www.detroitnews.com/story/news/local/michigan/2022/11/19/metro-detroit-personal-injury-attorney-convicted-of-tax-fraud/69662737007/)

CPAs, get four hours of fraud CPE with our Fraud Essentials for CPAs WebinarClick here for more information.

Fraud Friday: Tax (fraud) preparation manual

A Texas tax preparer and his two children were convicted for defrauding the U.S. after filing false tax returns to inflate their clients’ refunds. They fabricated clients’ Schedule A, itemized deductions, and Schedule C, sole proprietorship profit and loss statements, claiming the taxpayer owned a business when no such business existed, claiming unreimbursed employee expenses such as travel and per diem, and claiming business expenses that were never incurred. The company also had a “tax preparation manual,” which was a handbook that outlined exactly how to commit fraud. The manual advised tax preparers to manipulate income to maximize refunds rather than referring to the law to determine whether an activity was a business for income tax purposes and whether expenses properly qualified as a business deduction.

(www.justice.gov/usao-ndtx/pr/san-angelo-tax-preparer-sentenced-14-years-tax-fraud)

CPAs, get four hours of fraud CPE with our Fraud Essentials for CPAs WebinarClick here for more information.

Fraud Friday: 13,000 lottery “wins”

A man who has “won” the Massachusetts lottery in excess of 13,000 times has pleaded guilty to charges of tax fraud conspiracy, money laundering conspiracy, and filing false tax returns. The man and family members operated a lottery ticket cashing scheme that brought in $21 million between 2011 and 2019. In Massachusetts, money owed in federal taxes or child support can be deducted from lottery wins over $600. To avoid this deduction, winners often use underground ticket cashing businesses, which take a cut of the winnings. The family members reported fraudulent gambling losses and understated their income, resulting in large refunds. 

(www.casino.org/news/mass-lottery-frequent-winner-pleads-guilty-to-tax-fraud-conspiracy/)

CPAs, get four hours of fraud CPE with our Fraud Essentials for CPAs WebinarClick here for more information.

Fraud Friday: The Nigerian Prince e-mail scam

The Nigerian Prince e-mail scam is a modern interpretation of the Spanish Prisoner scam that dates back to the late 18th century. Originally, businessmen were contacted by an individual allegedly trying to smuggle someone connected to a wealthy family out of a prison in Spain. The scammer promised to share money with the victim in exchange for a small amount of money up front to bribe prison guards. The scam has persisted, shifting to requests for assistance purportedly coming from a Nigerian prince. While Nigeria is most often the nation referred to in these scams, they originate in other nations as well. The scam is also known as the “419 scam”; 419 refers to the article of the Nigerian Criminal Code dealing with fraud (in Chapter 38: “Obtaining property by false pretenses; Cheating”).

(https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Advance-fee_scam)

CPAs, get four hours of fraud CPE with our Fraud Essentials for CPAs WebinarClick here for more information.

Fraud Friday: Rap duo

Two female Detroit rappers (known on stage as Deuces Wild) are charged with identity theft and conspiracy for a scheme going back to 2013 that involved filing fraudulent estate and trust tax returns claiming $13.6 million, of which they had already received more than $5 million. The duo filed 122 returns, opened 29 bank accounts, and roped friends and acquaintances into the scheme by promising them a cut of the money in exchange for receiving checks. One of the women used stolen identification to open accounts, rent apartments, open a UPS Box, and purchase expensive items, including jewelry and watches. Both women are facing ten years in prison if convicted.

(www.fox2detroit.com/news/metro-detroit-rappers-charged-with-stealing-over-5-million-from-irs)

CPAs, get four hours of fraud CPE with our Fraud Essentials for CPAs WebinarClick here for more information.

Fraud Friday: Julia Butterfly

“Tax redirection” is a form of tax rebellion where the individual pays their tax directly to another source rather than the IRS as a form of protest. Julia “Butterfly” Hill, an environmentalist turned proponent of tax redirection, sent about $150,000 in federal taxes directly to schools, arts and culture programs, community gardens, and other recipients, stating in a letter to the IRS, “I’m not refusing to pay my taxes. I’m actually paying them but I’m paying them where they belong because you refuse to do so.” Hill is best known for her tree sit in the late 1990s, when she lived in a 180-foot tall Redwood tree named Luna for 738 days to protect it from being cut down by the Pacific Lumber Company.

(https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Julia_Butterfly_Hill)

CPAs, get four hours of fraud CPE with our Fraud Essentials for CPAs WebinarClick here for more information.

Fraud Friday: The Whiskey Rebellion

In 1791, Treasury Secretary Alexander Hamilton proposed the first U.S. tax, an excise on distilled spirits, to pay down the debt incurred from the American Revolution. Large whiskey producers paid the tax annually at a rate of six cents per gallon, with further tax breaks the more they produced. But small producers were charged nine cents per gallon in taxes. Farmers in western Pennsylvania who used whiskey for trade objected to the tax and protested by tarring and feathering the tax collectors. The rebellion lasted from 1791 to 1794, ending with a confrontation that caused President George Washington to send 13,000 troops to contain what some feared would become another revolution. (www.history.com/topics/early-us/whiskey-rebellion)

CPAs, get four hours of fraud CPE with our Fraud Essentials for CPAs WebinarClick here for more information.

Fraud Friday: “Illegal tax protestors”

Tax protestors rely on various arguments, such as the Sixteenth Amendment not being properly ratified, income is not defined in the Internal Revenue Code or the Constitution, or that the Internal Revenue Code actually doesn’t require anyone to pay tax. Prior to 1998, the IRS would label such individuals as “illegal tax protestors” in their system to flag them for enforcement actions and alert IRS employees to be cautious in dealing with them. But in 1998, Congress passed the Internal Revenue Service Restructuring and Reform Act of 1998 (P.L. 105-206) prohibiting the IRS from continuing this practice because it stigmatized these individuals and biased IRS employees against them, even if they had ultimately paid their tax.

(www.washingtonpost.com/news/federal-eye/wp/2014/09/11/what-is-an-illegal-tax-protester-and-why-cant-the-irs-use-that-term-any-more/)

CPAs, get four hours of fraud CPE with our Fraud Essentials for CPAs WebinarClick here for more information.

Fraud Friday: In the doghouse

A Minnesota dog breeder is in the doghouse after an investigation discovered that they were reporting income on their tax returns from fewer sales of puppies than they actually made in the years at issue. The Facebook page for BrookeMarie’s Goldendoodle Love clearly showed the number of litters and how many total puppies were for sale, which did not match up with the amounts reported. The puppies were going for between $2,500 and $3,500 each, plus there should have been charged 7% Minnesota sales tax, which the breeder also failed to pay. The owner has been charged with three felony counts of filing fraudulent income and sales tax returns and failing to pay or collect income and sales tax.

(www.southernminnesotanews.com/dog-breeder-accused-of-tax-fraud/)

CPAs, get four hours of fraud CPE with our Fraud Essentials for CPAs WebinarClick here for more information.

Fraud Friday: $62 million in Paycheck Protection Program fraud

A California tax preparer was sentenced to ten years in prison for orchestrating a scheme that defrauded the Paycheck Protection Program out of $62 million. At the time he engaged in the fraud, he was on supervised release for a previous fraud scheme in which he filed false income tax returns on behalf of more than nine professional athletes. In the PPP scam, he filed false applications for PPP loans on behalf of small businesses and shell companies in exchange for 30% of the loan proceeds. He also filed fraudulent supporting tax returns that the small business owners never saw or approved. To hide the funds he received from the scam, he asked the businesses to pay the fee with cashier’s checks and to write “payroll” in the memo line.

(www.wric.com/news/crime/man-sentenced-for-tax-fraud-schemes-resulting-in-more-than-62-million-loss-for-us-government/)

CPAs, get four hours of fraud CPE with our Fraud Essentials for CPAs WebinarClick here for more information.

Fraud Friday: Distributing false resale certificates

Sotheby’s auction house is under investigation in New York for allegedly distributing false resale certificates to around a dozen clients, allowing them to pose as art dealers and avoid paying tax on revenue from their sales. The scheme is related to a lawsuit in which a Sotheby’s client purchased $27 million in art for his personal collection in transactions that avoided tax. Initially, it seemed this was an isolated incident, but further investigation revealed multiple fraudulent resale certificates, indicating that staff at Sotheby’s had “willfully turned a blind eye to the fraudulent distribution of resale certificates.” Sotheby’s argues it shouldn’t be held responsible for the actions of low-level employees. (www.artnews.com/art-news/news/sothebys-tax-fraud-investigation-expands-1234637480/)

CPAs, get four hours of fraud CPE with our Fraud Essentials for CPAs WebinarClick here for more information.

Fraud Friday: AI pool-finding

France is using AI to find undeclared swimming pools, which so far has generated 10 million in tax. In France, a swimming pool can affect tax because housing taxes are calculated based on a property’s rental value. Since the beginning of the pandemic, and with recent heat waves affecting Europe, the number of pools in France has greatly increased. The AI pool-finding project so far has only covered nine of France’s 96 metropolitan areas, but it has already discovered 20,356 undeclared swimming pools. The French tax office DGFiP (a.k.a., Le Fisc) estimates it can bring in an additional €40 million in tax once it’s finished using AI to analyze the rest of metropolitan France. (www.theverge.com/2022/8/30/23328442/france-ai-swimming-pool-tax-aerial-photos)

CPAs, get four hours of fraud CPE with our Fraud Essentials for CPAs WebinarClick here for more information.

Fraud Friday: Romanian taxes on imported diesel fuel

The U.S. will return $1.2 million in forfeited funds to Romania, stemming from a tax fraud scheme involving diesel fuel. A Romanian couple avoided Romanian taxes on imported diesel fuel by claiming the fuel was a lower grade of industrial and maritime fuel. The untaxed income from the sale of the higher value diesel was laundered through a number of bank accounts and shell companies controlled by the couple, and resulted in an overall $58.677 million tax loss to Romania. Before they could be arrested, the couple fled to Washington state, but eventually were extradited, leaving behind a large piece of property and assets that were sold. The funds from the sale will be returned to the government of Romania. 

(www.justice.gov/opa/pr/12-million-be-returned-romanian-government-victim-international-tax-fraud-and-money, www.justice.gov/opa/pr/12-million-be-returned-romanian-government-victim-international-tax-fraud-and-money)

CPAs, get four hours of fraud CPE with our Fraud Essentials for CPAs WebinarClick here for more information.

Fraud Friday: Paid public restrooms

A German woman who owns a cleaning company that earns revenue from paid public restrooms is on trial for failing to report around €1.2 million. The restrooms have voluntary contribution plates where visitors can leave change, which generated the income that she failed to report. But the case is complicated in that some of the charges date back more than 14 years, the German statute of limitations for tax fraud. Also, some of the restrooms were near the Austrian border and present a jurisdictional problem. And because income from the restrooms is based on voluntary donations, it’s difficult to nail down an exact amount of revenue; even the judge in the case suggested that an amount of €600,000 may be more appropriate than €1.2 million. 

(www.taxbuzz.com/blog/germany-toilet-tax-evasion-trial-begins)

CPAs, get four hours of fraud CPE with our Fraud Essentials for CPAs WebinarClick here for more information.

Fraud Friday: Yoga studio stacking parties

Owners of a NYC yoga studio are facing 30 years in prison for conspiracy and tax evasion for failing to file returns while the yoga studio raked in millions. The chain of studios closed in 2020 following allegations of questionable business practices such as pressuring instructors to work for free. Yoga session fees were donation-based and collected in tissue boxes that were passed around, but instructors were not allowed to count the money collected. Instead, the cash was brought to one studio owner’s home for “stacking parties” where the bills were counted and stacked. The owners spent the funds on personal items such as $270,000 on airfare, $76,000 on hotels, $40,000 on Denver Broncos season tickets, $39,000 at restaurants, and more than $60,000 spent at country clubs and on event tickets. 

(www.nytimes.com/2022/08/24/nyregion/tax-fraud-yoga-to-the-people.html)

CPAs, get four hours of fraud CPE with our Fraud Essentials for CPAs WebinarClick here for more information.

Fraud Friday: Imprecise IQ scores

A Court of Appeals upheld a ruling against a taxpayer for filing false tax returns connected to his wife’s embezzlement of millions of dollars from her employer. The taxpayer argued he thought the funds were his wife’s gambling winnings, which he used to buy a yacht, a snowmobile, and other luxury items. At the appeal trial, the taxpayer argued the district court erred in not allowing evidence of his cognitive deficiencies, consisting of expert testimony and his high school transcript that contained numerous “E” grades. However, the expert could not rule out that the taxpayer’s performance during his cognitive exam was the result of malingering, and the high school transcript contained “an unexplained grading system and imprecise IQ scores.” Based on these and the taxpayer’s own testimony, the court agreed he was aware the couple was spending more than they reported and was found to have not disclosed all income to his accountants. (U.S. v. Mills (July 22, 2022) U.S. Court of Appeals, Third Circuit, Case No. 21-2423)

CPAs, get four hours of fraud CPE with our Fraud Essentials for CPAs WebinarClick here for more information.

Fraud Friday: 76 fraudulent charities

The House Ways and Means Oversight Subcommittee has contacted the IRS looking for answers regarding the streamlined process for applications for tax-exempt status, which allowed one fraudster to have 76 fraudulent charities approved. The fake nonprofits all had names that sounded similar to legitimate nonprofits, such as “American Cancer Society of Michigan.” The actual American Cancer Society had even gotten wind of its fraudulent namesake and contacted the IRS. The IRS is now under fire for not noticing that this particular group of fraudulent charities all used the same Staten Island address. It also highlights the IRS’s own statistics that only one in 2,400 of these streamlined applications gets denied. (www.wealthmanagement.com/philanthropy/irs-hot-water-over-fraudulent-charities)

CPAs, get four hours of fraud CPE with our Fraud Essentials for CPAs WebinarClick here for more information.

Fraud Friday: A vexatious litigant

After being disbarred for bringing numerous unmeritorious litigations and being declared a vexatious litigant (one trial judge wrote in a statement of decision that the taxpayer is “a relentless bully” who displays “terrifying arrogance”), a former attorney found himself in Tax Court regarding disallowed Schedule C expenses. The claimed Schedule C business activities did not generate a profit and mostly stemmed from litigation relating to challenging the taxpayer’s disbarment and lawsuits that would otherwise personally benefit him. He deducted court filing fees, life insurance policy expenses, and various utility expenses, none of which were allowable expenses because the taxpayer failed to show that he engaged in any business activities for the year at issue. (Kinney v. Comm., TCM 2022-81)

CPAs, get four hours of fraud CPE with our Fraud Essentials for CPAs WebinarClick here for more information.

Fraud Friday: A sovereign citizen

A Michigan man is facing felony charges and prison time for bouncing three checks he wrote to pay his taxes. The man, who also claims to be a sovereign citizen, sent the State of Michigan three checks for $1 million each, which bounced because they had routing numbers for TCF Bank. That in and of itself is not a crime, except he did not actually have an account at TCF Bank. Under Michigan law, no-account checks/writing checks on closed account is a class H felony that carries up to 2 years in prison. (www.michigan.gov/ag/news/press-releases/2022/02/10/self-proclaimed-sovereign-citizen-charged-with-writing-fake-checks)

CPAs, get four hours of fraud CPE with our Fraud Essentials for CPAs WebinarClick here for more information.

Fraud Friday: Shakira, Shakira

After being accused by the Spanish government of failing to pay €14 million in tax on income earned between 2012 and 2014, pop star Shakira has rejected a plea deal with Spanish authorities and is moving forward with a trial that she says will prove she has already paid the tax in question and owes no tax debt. For the tax years at issue, Shakira’s official residence was the Bahamas, but she also lived with footballer Gerard Pique in Barcelona. If found guilty, she could face fines and a prison term. (www.euronews.com/2022/07/27/shakira-opts-to-go-to-trial-in-spain-over-alleged-145m-tax-fraud)

CPAs, get four hours of fraud CPE with our Fraud Essentials for CPAs WebinarClick here for more information.

Fraud Friday: Nine professional athletes

A Los Angeles tax preparer has pleaded guilty to engaging in two separate fraud schemes. The first involved filing fraudulent income tax returns for at least nine professional athletes, reporting fabricated business and personal losses. The tax pro and his associates claimed they had specialized knowledge that the athletes’ prior tax professionals lacked and convinced the athletes to amend past returns to generate large fraudulent refunds. They then charged the athletes a fee of 30% of the resulting refund and directed the athletes to send the fee to shell entities. Second, the tax pro and his associates applied for PPP loans on behalf of a number of small businesses, shell entities with few or no employees that they controlled, and business entities controlled by others. They inflated the number of employees and monthly payroll costs claimed on the PPP loan applications and submitted fabricated tax returns in support of the applications. Some of the business owners never saw their loan applications before they were filed. The tax pro charged a fee of 30% of the loan amounts. He’s facing up to 25 years in prison. (https://www.justice.gov/opa/pr/second-defendant-pleads-guilty-multimillion-dollar-tax-fraud-scheme-involving-professional)

CPAs, get four hours of fraud CPE with our Fraud Essentials for CPAs WebinarClick here for more information.

Fraud Friday: Capital with a K

A North Carolina tax preparation business owner has been sentenced to almost four years in prison for a tax fraud scheme that involved hundreds of tax returns and that netted him $700,000. Kapital Financial Services had two locations in Charlotte, and the business owner directed employees to falsify clients’ tax returns, including claiming false deductions, business losses, American Opportunity credits, education credits and earned income tax credits. He also trained his employees on how to create the fraudulent returns to avoid IRS detection and provided them with scripts and cheat sheets. Employees were not allowed to provide clients with copies of their returns, they were only allowed to give clients their refund amount because the fees Kapital charged were taken from the inflated refunds. (https://www.justice.gov/opa/pr/charlotte-tax-preparer-sentenced-prison)

CPAs, get four hours of fraud CPE with our Fraud Essentials for CPAs WebinarClick here for more information.

Fraud Friday: $1 billion in crypto scams

Crypto scams have reached the $1 billion mark for the period between January 2021 and March 2022. Almost 40% of the scams originated on social media. In terms of type of fraud, most scams relate to fake investments that promise large returns, with second place going to “romance scams” that involve gaining trust using a fake online identity and then manipulating funds out of the victim. Most of the scams involve Bitcoin (70%), followed by tether (10%) and Ethereum (9%). (www.forbes.com/sites/rosemariemiller/2022/06/06/bitcoin-leads-crypto-fraud-as-ftc-confirms-1-billion-milestone)

CPAs, get four hours of fraud CPE with our Fraud Essentials for CPAs WebinarClick here for more information.

Fraud Friday: A seized show jumping horse

After busting a tax shelter promoter, the U.S. government seized many of the assets he purchased with the proceeds, including a $750,000 show jumping horse. However, after realizing that it was going to cost at least $50,000 to feed and care for the horse, the government agreed to sell the horse back to the tax shelter promoter’s daughter for $25,000. The daughter had been planning to ride the horse down the aisle on her wedding day. The government has seized horses before; in 2012 they sold 150 horses for $4.8 million, which were seized from a comptroller who had been misappropriating city funds. But maintaining assets before they’re sold can be expensive, as the government has found regarding the maintenance of superyachts seized from Russian oligarchs. (https://finance.yahoo.com/news/horse-seized-tax-fraud-case-133413396.html)

CPAs, get four hours of fraud CPE with our Fraud Essentials for CPAs WebinarClick here for more information.

Fraud Friday: Counterfeit chocolate

A bust of U.S.-themed candy stores on Oxford Street in London raked in £22,000 worth of counterfeit Wonka bars and over £100,000 of counterfeit goods such as vapes, Apple and Samsung products, hookah products, and watches. All counterfeit vapes recovered contained excessive levels of nicotine and had not been approved by the Medicines and Healthcare Products Regulatory Agency. The Food Standard Agency also warned anyone who purchased the counterfeit Wonka bars not to eat them, as there is no way of knowing what ingredients were used or whether food hygiene practices were followed. The stores are being investigated for millions of pounds in tax evasion as well.

CPAs, get four hours of fraud CPE with our Fraud Essentials for CPAs WebinarClick here for more information.

Fraud Friday: That’s a lot of Happy Meals

McDonald’s France has agreed to pay a total of €1.25 billion in fines, penalties, and back taxes to settle a tax evasion case after years of negotiations.  McDonalds France was accused of hiding French profits in lower-tax Luxembourg from 2009 through 2020, and reporting lower profits in France. An investigation was started in 2016 after union officials reported the company for tax evasion. The settlement is made up of a €508 million fine and €737 million in back taxes and is the second-biggest tax settlement in French history. (The largest was the €2.1 billion fine paid by aircraft builder Airbus in 2020.) (https://abcnews.go.com/Business/wireStory/mcdonalds-pay-france-13-billion-tax-fraud-case-85434599)

CPAs, get four hours of fraud CPE with our Fraud Essentials for CPAs WebinarClick here for more information.

Fraud Friday: Go Go Power Ranger

Austin St. John, the actor who played the Red Power Ranger in the 1990s TV show Mighty Morphin’ Power Rangers is facing up to 20 years in prison for participating in COVID-19–related wire fraud. St. John was part of a ring of 18 people who filed for $3.5 million in fraudulent PPP loans for existing or newly created small businesses. This is just the latest in the curse of the Red Power Ranger: in 2017 the actor who portrayed the Red Wild Force Ranger in Power Rangers Wild Force pled guilty to voluntary manslaughter for stabbing his roommate with a sword.

CPAs, get four hours of fraud CPE with our Fraud Essentials for CPAs WebinarClick here for more information.

Fraud Friday: A 70-year-old tax collector

A 70-year-old tax collector in Pennsylvania was sentenced to one year in prison for filing false returns that understated her income. She started underreporting in 2014 and gradually increased the unreported amount each year until her actual income was six times higher than what she reported to the IRS in 2018. She used the funds to buy a mobile home at the Jersey Shore, fund home renovations, and pay for a family vacation to Hawaii. The tax collector and her family argued for her to serve the sentence at home so she could begin paying restitution to the IRS, but the judge was unmoved considering the seriousness of the crime and the fact that she was an elected county tax collector who used her position to not pay her own taxes. (https://www.inquirer.com/news/rosezanna-czwalina-ridley-township-false-income-tax-sentence-20220518.html)

Fraud Friday: Sheep Ministries, Inc

A Tennessee woman is serving 51 months in prison for attempting to cash a fraudulent $1 million bill of exchange from a foreign source. The bill of exchange was flagged because it didn’t have magnetic ink coding like an ordinary check, it contained an “autograph” line instead of a signature line, and wording at the bottom of the document contained the misspelled word “neogotobile.” A private investigator at the bank alerted the police that the bill of exchange was fraudulent. Just prior to the bank fraud incident, she had also filed a fraudulent tax return claiming a $250,000 refund. At trial, it was revealed that in 2006 she had been convicted of multiple counts of filing fraudulent returns using personal information stolen through Sheep Ministries, Inc., the faith-based nonprofit that she ran. (United States v. Marilyn Cook (May 6, 2022) U.S. Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit, Case No. 20-5622)

Fraud Friday: $1 billion cryptocurrency Ponzi scheme

Tax investigators from the J5 (Joint Chiefs of Global Tax Enforcement) have uncovered evidence of a $1 billion cryptocurrency Ponzi scheme. The leads concern transactions around the world, including crypto transactions in the J5 nations: the U.S., the U.K., the Netherlands, Canada, and Australia. Some of the leads involve individuals with significant NFT transactions; NFTs are becoming a new tool in money laundering practices. The IRS is now making tracking cryptocurrency one of its primary priorities, because the lack of regulation and oversight makes cryptocurrency vulnerable to fraud. (https://www.thestreet.com/investing/crypto-ponzi-scheme-irs-regulators)

CPAs, get four hours of fraud CPE with our 2021 Fundamentals of Fraud Prevention & Detection On-Demand WebinarClick here for more information.

Fraud Friday: Daycare center credit cards

Married taxpayers were liable for fraud penalties for failing to report wage and dividend income from the daycare centers they owned and operated. The taxpayers also each had a credit card tied to the corporate bank account, which they used to purchase personal items such as college tuition, vacations, jewelry, and other luxury items. Their adult children also made personal purchases using the corporate credit cards, even though they were not employees of the daycare centers. The daycare center also paid for a Hummer, a BMW, and an Escalade for the taxpayers and their children to drive as their personal vehicles. (Hacker v. Comm., TCM 2022-16)

CPAs, get four hours of fraud CPE with our 2021 Fundamentals of Fraud Prevention & Detection On-Demand WebinarClick here for more information.

Fraud Friday: Consulate conspiracy

A U.S. Consulate officer in Vietnam was charged with conspiracy after participating in a scheme where nonimmigrant visa applicants paid him to approve their visas, netting him over $3 million. He initially kept his payments in a home safe, but as the stash grew, he purchased nine properties in Thailand to attempt to hide the proceeds of the scam. On his tax return for the year at issue, he reported his income from the Consulate Office, but did not report the bribery income. As part of his plea agreement, he agreed to sell the Thailand properties to help pay off the money judgement against him. The properties were sold at a loss, which the taxpayer deducted from his bribery proceeds. But the Tax Court determined that loss deductions are disallowed where the deduction would frustrate federal or state policy. Allowing a deduction for losses arising from the properties obtained through illegal activities would undermine public policy because a portion of the forfeiture would be borne by the Government. (Sestak v. Comm., TCM 2022-41)

CPAs, get four hours of fraud CPE with our 2021 Fundamentals of Fraud Prevention & Detection On-Demand WebinarClick here for more information.

Fraud Friday: Questionable business practices

A real estate developer in Michigan is facing five years in prison plus penalties and restitution for lying to the IRS in an attempt to hide his failure to pay employment taxes he withheld from employee wages. During the investigation, the developer (who is a former CPA) lied to IRS special agents about his companies’ assets income, filed false employment tax returns stating he had no employees, and claimed he could not afford to pay his tax debts. Meanwhile, he was using business accounts to pay for his Lake Michigan vacation home, Lansing condo, car payments, college tuition, personal credit card bills, and his boat. In 2021, he had filed a defamation suit against an East Lansing news outlet for publishing a story on his questionable business practices. The suit was dismissed. (www.justice.gov/Usao-wdmi/pr/2022_0426_Chappelle)

CPAs, get four hours of fraud CPE with our 2021 Fundamentals of Fraud Prevention & Detection On-Demand WebinarClick here for more information.

Putting your child’s name on your home

Dear [CLIENT NAME]:

Many people think it’s a good idea to put their child’s name on the title to their home. Sometimes the parent adds the child’s name to the title and sometimes the parent changes the title to the child’s name. This is generally a very bad idea. Here are five reasons why:

  1. Gift tax return: If you give your child a gift of equity in the home that exceeds $16,000 in value (in 2022), there may be a gift tax to pay and a gift tax return to file.
  2. No gain exclusion: Tax law allows a taxpayer to exclude up to $250,000 of the gain on the sale of a principal residence ($500,000 for a married couple). However, the exclusion is only available if the seller owns and occupies the property for at least two out of the last five years. If the child does not live in the home for that period, the gain on the child’s share of the home is fully taxable.
  3. Equity subject to debts of the child: Property is subject to the debts of its owners. If the child owns the home or is a partial owner, a creditor may file a lien on the property for any of the child’s debts. Although your child may have excellent credit and good fiscal responsibility, your home could be lost if there is an accident or a lawsuit.
  4. You are now a renter: If you give 100% of the property to a child, you are now at the mercy of the child. If the child decides to sell the property, you must move out. There is no guarantee that the child will continue to care for you.
  5. Medicaid problems: Under some circumstances, the gift of the home to the child could be considered a gift for Medicaid purposes. If you give the home to the child and the child subsequently sells it, you could be ineligible for Medicaid benefits in the event of a long-term health crisis.

What should you do instead?

Usually a parent gives the home to the child to make sure that the child easily gets the home at the parent’s death or so the child can manage the affairs of the parent. If this is the case, the parent will be better served by establishing a living trust, along with powers of attorney, so the child can manage the parent’s affairs.

If the reason is to help the child buy his or her first house, a better way is to lend the child money with a low but reasonable interest rate, and set up a program to give annual gifts in the form of principal forgiveness.

If you are considering giving your home to your child, contact me so we can discuss alternatives.

Sincerely,

Your tax professional

Fraud Friday: Philadelphia cheesesteak

In 2020, the 82-year-old owner of a South Philadelphia cheesesteak shop and his son were indicted on tax fraud charges for failing to report more than $8 million between 2006 and 2016. However, there’s so much material to discover in their complex tax case that a Pennsylvania federal court continued discovery until May 2022. The father-son duo are accused of paying wages partially in cash to avoid payroll taxes and filing numerous false returns understating their business income. During a franchising rights dispute, the pair worried their tax fraud scheme would come to light, so they amended several returns to increase reported sales, but then claimed additional fraudulent expenses to offset the income. If they’re convicted, they face five years in prison for conspiracy and for each count of tax evasion, and three years in prison for each false return charge. (https://6abc.com/tony-lukes-tax-fraud-evasion-anthony-lucidonio-sr-nicholas/6332901/)

CPAs, get four hours of fraud CPE with our 2021 Fundamentals of Fraud Prevention & Detection On-Demand WebinarClick here for more information.

Fraud Friday: If preparing (fraudulent) tax returns is wrong…

If preparing (fraudulent) tax returns is wrong, then I don’t want to be right! A Texas tax pro was banned in 2011 from conducting a tax preparation business after she admitted to preparing or assisting to prepare approximately 200 false tax returns. The tax credits she tried to obtain in that case were described in a filing as “so exaggerated that no reasonable person could conclude they were anything but deliberately fabricated.” But she was back at it again, and since 2016, she had been preparing income tax returns for clients despite the prohibition. She prepared numerous false returns which claimed various false items on her clients’ behalf: false wages, salaries, tips, and tax credits such as the Earned Income Credit, Child Tax Credit, and American Opportunity Tax Credit. She has been sentenced to 15 months in prison. (www.justice.gov/usao-sdtx/pr/tax-preparer-sent-prison-tax-fraud-again)

CPAs, get four hours of fraud CPE with our 2021 Fundamentals of Fraud Prevention & Detection On-Demand WebinarClick here for more information.

Fraud Friday: The taxpayer hatched a plan for revenge

After a routine inspection by the Bureau of Alcohol, Firearms, Tobacco, and Explosives (ATF) uncovered violations that resulted in a taxpayer’s business ultimately closing, the taxpayer hatched a plan for revenge. Five years later, he issued W-9s to the two ATF agents, requesting their Social Security numbers. He never received that information, and he then issued a Form 1099-MISC to each of the agents, showing he paid them $250,000 apiece. The agents did not report the income, and the taxpayer deducted $500,000 on the company’s return, flowing the loss through to his individual return. At trial, the taxpayer insisted he had spoken with an IRS agent who said it was acceptable to write off the $500,000. He was sentenced to two years in prison for filing false returns. (U.S. v. Petrunak (May 4, 2017) U.S. Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit, Case No. 16-3631)

CPAs, get four hours of fraud CPE with our 2021 Fundamentals of Fraud Prevention & Detection On-Demand WebinarClick here for more information.

Fraud Friday: Detached and disinterested generosity

A taxpayer successfully argued that $10,500 in checks she received from her boyfriend were gifts, not income. Her boyfriend had reported the payments on a 1099-MISC and deducted them from his income, claiming that he had paid her wages. As a result, the IRS had come looking for income tax since the taxpayer had not reported the income. At trial, the ex-boyfriend changed his story and was evasive in answering questions. The taxpayer, on the other hand, answered every question asked — even those that did not help her case. The court found the taxpayer’s testimony to be forthright and the ex-boyfriends to be untrue, and determined that the $10,500 was paid to the taxpayer with “detached and disinterested generosity,” and held that it was a gift, not reportable income. (Jue-Ya Yang v. Comm., TCS 2008-156)

CPAs, get four hours of fraud CPE with our 2021 Fundamentals of Fraud Prevention & Detection On-Demand WebinarClick here for more information.